Animal Study Registries: Results from a Stakeholder Analysis on Potential Strengths, Weaknesses, Facilitators, and Barriers.
Publication bias in animal research, its extent, its predictors, and its potential countermeasures are increasingly discussed. Recent reports and conferences highlight the potential strengths of animal study registries (ASRs) in this regard. Others have warned that prospective registration of animal...
Main Authors: | Susanne Wieschowski, Diego S Silva, Daniel Strech |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-11-01
|
Series: | PLoS Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000391 |
Similar Items
-
Attitudes towards animal study registries and their characteristics: An online survey of three cohorts of animal researchers.
by: Susanne Wieschowski, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study.
by: Till Bruckner, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Publication rates in animal research. Extent and characteristics of published and non-published animal studies followed up at two German university medical centres.
by: Susanne Wieschowski, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Web-based survey among animal researchers on publication practices and incentives for increasing publication rates.
by: Susanne Deutsch, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Registry stakeholders
by: Lübbeke, A, et al.
Published: (2019)