Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects

Retrospective analysis of 78 MR images of fetus has shown 30% of coincidence of MR-imaging and ultrasonographic diagnoses, 37% of different diagnoses, and 33% — adjustments of ultrasonographic diagnosis and obtaining of additional information with MR imaging in 63% cases. The results obtained demons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Korostyshevskaya, A. A. Savelov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk) 2012-10-01
Series:Бюллетень сибирской медицины
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/636
_version_ 1797873050094403584
author A. M. Korostyshevskaya
A. A. Savelov
author_facet A. M. Korostyshevskaya
A. A. Savelov
author_sort A. M. Korostyshevskaya
collection DOAJ
description Retrospective analysis of 78 MR images of fetus has shown 30% of coincidence of MR-imaging and ultrasonographic diagnoses, 37% of different diagnoses, and 33% — adjustments of ultrasonographic diagnosis and obtaining of additional information with MR imaging in 63% cases. The results obtained demonstrate clearly that MR imaging should be included in the algorithm of pregnancy follow-up, if some signs are revealed by ultrasonography.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T01:08:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b866978eef84d5091dca5aa7ea445e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1682-0363
1819-3684
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T01:08:55Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Siberian State Medical University (Tomsk)
record_format Article
series Бюллетень сибирской медицины
spelling doaj.art-9b866978eef84d5091dca5aa7ea445e32023-03-13T09:58:17ZengSiberian State Medical University (Tomsk)Бюллетень сибирской медицины1682-03631819-36842012-10-0111512813110.20538/1682-0363-2012-5-128-131576Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defectsA. M. Korostyshevskaya0A. A. Savelov1Институт «Международный томографический центр» СО РАН, г. НовосибирскИнститут «Международный томографический центр» СО РАН, г. НовосибирскRetrospective analysis of 78 MR images of fetus has shown 30% of coincidence of MR-imaging and ultrasonographic diagnoses, 37% of different diagnoses, and 33% — adjustments of ultrasonographic diagnosis and obtaining of additional information with MR imaging in 63% cases. The results obtained demonstrate clearly that MR imaging should be included in the algorithm of pregnancy follow-up, if some signs are revealed by ultrasonography.https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/636магнитно-резонансная томографияврожденные пороки развития
spellingShingle A. M. Korostyshevskaya
A. A. Savelov
Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
Бюллетень сибирской медицины
магнитно-резонансная томография
врожденные пороки развития
title Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
title_full Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
title_fullStr Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
title_full_unstemmed Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
title_short Role of magnetic-resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
title_sort role of magnetic resonance imaging of fetus in diagnostics of congenital defects
topic магнитно-резонансная томография
врожденные пороки развития
url https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/636
work_keys_str_mv AT amkorostyshevskaya roleofmagneticresonanceimagingoffetusindiagnosticsofcongenitaldefects
AT aasavelov roleofmagneticresonanceimagingoffetusindiagnosticsofcongenitaldefects