The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine

In this paper I suggest that the “missile” and the “targeting” metaphors in research on nanoparticle-based drug delivery play different roles. I argue that the “missile” plays a marginal scientific role and a more important role in communication, while “targeting” has become an organizing metaphor f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gry Oftedal
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Éditions Kimé 2019-02-01
Series:Philosophia Scientiæ
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1742
_version_ 1797402622725980160
author Gry Oftedal
author_facet Gry Oftedal
author_sort Gry Oftedal
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I suggest that the “missile” and the “targeting” metaphors in research on nanoparticle-based drug delivery play different roles. I argue that the “missile” plays a marginal scientific role and a more important role in communication, while “targeting” has become an organizing metaphor for the research field. The reason, I suggest, is that targeting is the main explanandum of the field and that this metaphor continues to be relevant even as nanomedicine matures towards tackling more complex problems. Finally, I discuss recent suggestions of new complexity-oriented metaphors, and I suggest that the significant role of simplifying models and the genuine need for such models may explain why complexity metaphors have not caught on among researchers.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b8c1b7f257d46318db3e00ae7a285dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1281-2463
1775-4283
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:53Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Éditions Kimé
record_format Article
series Philosophia Scientiæ
spelling doaj.art-9b8c1b7f257d46318db3e00ae7a285dd2023-12-06T15:53:43ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832019-02-01231395510.4000/philosophiascientiae.1742The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in NanomedicineGry OftedalIn this paper I suggest that the “missile” and the “targeting” metaphors in research on nanoparticle-based drug delivery play different roles. I argue that the “missile” plays a marginal scientific role and a more important role in communication, while “targeting” has become an organizing metaphor for the research field. The reason, I suggest, is that targeting is the main explanandum of the field and that this metaphor continues to be relevant even as nanomedicine matures towards tackling more complex problems. Finally, I discuss recent suggestions of new complexity-oriented metaphors, and I suggest that the significant role of simplifying models and the genuine need for such models may explain why complexity metaphors have not caught on among researchers.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1742
spellingShingle Gry Oftedal
The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
Philosophia Scientiæ
title The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
title_full The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
title_fullStr The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
title_full_unstemmed The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
title_short The Role of “Missile” and “Targeting” Metaphors in Nanomedicine
title_sort role of missile and targeting metaphors in nanomedicine
url http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1742
work_keys_str_mv AT gryoftedal theroleofmissileandtargetingmetaphorsinnanomedicine
AT gryoftedal roleofmissileandtargetingmetaphorsinnanomedicine