The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science
We question the movement towards exclusion of population and social health research from the field of science. The background under analysis is contemporary Brazil, where the scientific field that hosts this kind of research is known as Collective Health. First, the problem is formalized on logical...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2003-01-01
|
| Series: | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702003000100010 |
| _version_ | 1831809784126373888 |
|---|---|
| author | Almeida-Filho Naomar Goldbaum Moisés |
| author_facet | Almeida-Filho Naomar Goldbaum Moisés |
| author_sort | Almeida-Filho Naomar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We question the movement towards exclusion of population and social health research from the field of science. The background under analysis is contemporary Brazil, where the scientific field that hosts this kind of research is known as Collective Health. First, the problem is formalized on logical grounds, evaluating the pertinence of considering unscientific the many objects and methods of public health research. Secondly, the cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and external causes are brought in as illustrations of the kind of scientific problem faced in health research today. The logical and epistemological basis of different forms of "scientific segregation" based on biomedical reductionism is analyzed, departing from three theses: (i) the ethics of the general application of science; (ii) the inappropriateness of monopolies for objectivity in the sciences; (iii) the specificity of scientific fields. In the current panorama of health research in Brazil, a residual hegemonic position that defends a narrow and specific definition of the object of knowledge was found. The denial of validity and specificity to objects, methods and research techniques that constitute social and population research in health is linked to elements of irrationality in reductionism approaches. Nevertheless, efforts should be directed to overcome this scientific division, in order to develop a pluralist and interdisciplinary national science, committed to the health care realities of our country. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T20:47:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9b94aebb939641a185f0c26a84c40d14 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1413-8670 1678-4391 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T20:47:20Z |
| publishDate | 2003-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
| spelling | doaj.art-9b94aebb939641a185f0c26a84c40d142022-12-21T18:13:11ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1413-86701678-43912003-01-01718290The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied scienceAlmeida-Filho NaomarGoldbaum MoisésWe question the movement towards exclusion of population and social health research from the field of science. The background under analysis is contemporary Brazil, where the scientific field that hosts this kind of research is known as Collective Health. First, the problem is formalized on logical grounds, evaluating the pertinence of considering unscientific the many objects and methods of public health research. Secondly, the cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and external causes are brought in as illustrations of the kind of scientific problem faced in health research today. The logical and epistemological basis of different forms of "scientific segregation" based on biomedical reductionism is analyzed, departing from three theses: (i) the ethics of the general application of science; (ii) the inappropriateness of monopolies for objectivity in the sciences; (iii) the specificity of scientific fields. In the current panorama of health research in Brazil, a residual hegemonic position that defends a narrow and specific definition of the object of knowledge was found. The denial of validity and specificity to objects, methods and research techniques that constitute social and population research in health is linked to elements of irrationality in reductionism approaches. Nevertheless, efforts should be directed to overcome this scientific division, in order to develop a pluralist and interdisciplinary national science, committed to the health care realities of our country.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702003000100010Public healthcollective healthbasic sciencesapplied sciencesscience and technology policyBrazil |
| spellingShingle | Almeida-Filho Naomar Goldbaum Moisés The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases Public health collective health basic sciences applied sciences science and technology policy Brazil |
| title | The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science |
| title_full | The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science |
| title_fullStr | The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science |
| title_full_unstemmed | The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science |
| title_short | The value of public health research and the division between basic vs. applied science |
| title_sort | value of public health research and the division between basic vs applied science |
| topic | Public health collective health basic sciences applied sciences science and technology policy Brazil |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702003000100010 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidafilhonaomar thevalueofpublichealthresearchandthedivisionbetweenbasicvsappliedscience AT goldbaummoises thevalueofpublichealthresearchandthedivisionbetweenbasicvsappliedscience AT almeidafilhonaomar valueofpublichealthresearchandthedivisionbetweenbasicvsappliedscience AT goldbaummoises valueofpublichealthresearchandthedivisionbetweenbasicvsappliedscience |