Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin
In this contribution, I respond to articles published in a Topical Issue of Open Philosophy on Kant’s Transcendental Dialectic by Mario Caimi, Gabriele Gava, and Michael Lewin, who criticize some of the views I put forward in my book Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason (...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Open Philosophy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0221 |
| _version_ | 1828097818840006656 |
|---|---|
| author | Willaschek Marcus |
| author_facet | Willaschek Marcus |
| author_sort | Willaschek Marcus |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this contribution, I respond to articles published in a Topical Issue of Open Philosophy on Kant’s Transcendental Dialectic by Mario Caimi, Gabriele Gava, and Michael Lewin, who criticize some of the views I put forward in my book Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2018). In particular, I discuss the “real use” of reason (in response to Caimi), the “regulative use” of principles and ideas of reason (in response to Gava), and Kant’s conception of reason (in response to Lewin). |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:51:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9b9808f53edc4e9fbb63b2595c9aa599 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2543-8875 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:51:49Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Philosophy |
| spelling | doaj.art-9b9808f53edc4e9fbb63b2595c9aa5992022-12-22T04:36:03ZengDe GruyterOpen Philosophy2543-88752022-11-015168969810.1515/opphil-2022-0221Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and LewinWillaschek Marcus0Department of Philosophy, Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am Main, GermanyIn this contribution, I respond to articles published in a Topical Issue of Open Philosophy on Kant’s Transcendental Dialectic by Mario Caimi, Gabriele Gava, and Michael Lewin, who criticize some of the views I put forward in my book Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press, 2018). In particular, I discuss the “real use” of reason (in response to Caimi), the “regulative use” of principles and ideas of reason (in response to Gava), and Kant’s conception of reason (in response to Lewin).https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0221kanttranscendental dialecticreal use of reasonregulative principlesregulative ideasreason |
| spellingShingle | Willaschek Marcus Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin Open Philosophy kant transcendental dialectic real use of reason regulative principles regulative ideas reason |
| title | Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin |
| title_full | Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin |
| title_fullStr | Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin |
| title_short | Reason, Its Real Use, and the Status of Its Ideas and Principles: Response to Caimi, Gava, and Lewin |
| title_sort | reason its real use and the status of its ideas and principles response to caimi gava and lewin |
| topic | kant transcendental dialectic real use of reason regulative principles regulative ideas reason |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0221 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT willaschekmarcus reasonitsrealuseandthestatusofitsideasandprinciplesresponsetocaimigavaandlewin |