Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays

Diagnosis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is usually determined serologically by detection of the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies or rising anti-HEV IgG titers. However, serological assays have demonstrated a significant variation in their sensitivities and specificities. In this study, we pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanja Vollmer, Juergen Diekmann, Matthias Eberhardt, Cornelius Knabbe, Jens Dreier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-08-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/8/232
_version_ 1830162147778232320
author Tanja Vollmer
Juergen Diekmann
Matthias Eberhardt
Cornelius Knabbe
Jens Dreier
author_facet Tanja Vollmer
Juergen Diekmann
Matthias Eberhardt
Cornelius Knabbe
Jens Dreier
author_sort Tanja Vollmer
collection DOAJ
description Diagnosis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is usually determined serologically by detection of the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies or rising anti-HEV IgG titers. However, serological assays have demonstrated a significant variation in their sensitivities and specificities. In this study, we present the systematic comparison of different immunological anti-HEV assays using complete seroconversion panels of 10 virologically confirmed HEV genotype 3 infected individuals. Assay sensitivities were further evaluated by testing serially diluted World Health Organization (WHO) reference reagent for hepatitis E virus antibody and one patient sample infected with HEV genotype 3. Anti-HEV IgM and IgG antibody presence was determined using the immunological assays Wantai HEV IgM/IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Sanbio, Uden, The Netherlands), recomWell HEV IgM/IgG (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany), HEV IgM ELISA 3.0, HEV ELISA, HEV ELISA 4.0, Assure HEV IgM Rapid Test (all MP Biomedicals Europe, Illkirch Cedex, France) and Anti-HEV ELISA (IgM/IgG, Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). The assays showed differences regarding their analytical and diagnostic sensitivities, with anti-HEV IgM assays (n = 5) being more divergent compared to anti-HEV IgG (n = 4) assays in this study. Considerable variations were observed particularly for the detection period of IgM antibodies. This is the first study systematically characterizing serologic assays on the basis of seroconversion panels, providing sample conformity for a conclusive comparison. Future studies should include the assay comparison covering the four different genotypes.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T15:14:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b991367fd87466ba947b9a46c95923d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T15:14:00Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-9b991367fd87466ba947b9a46c95923d2022-12-21T21:43:35ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152016-08-018823210.3390/v8080232v8080232Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG AssaysTanja Vollmer0Juergen Diekmann1Matthias Eberhardt2Cornelius Knabbe3Jens Dreier4Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyHerz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyTMD Gesellschaft für transfusionsmedizinische Dienste mbH, 34117 Kassel, GermanyHerz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyHerz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, GermanyDiagnosis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is usually determined serologically by detection of the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies or rising anti-HEV IgG titers. However, serological assays have demonstrated a significant variation in their sensitivities and specificities. In this study, we present the systematic comparison of different immunological anti-HEV assays using complete seroconversion panels of 10 virologically confirmed HEV genotype 3 infected individuals. Assay sensitivities were further evaluated by testing serially diluted World Health Organization (WHO) reference reagent for hepatitis E virus antibody and one patient sample infected with HEV genotype 3. Anti-HEV IgM and IgG antibody presence was determined using the immunological assays Wantai HEV IgM/IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Sanbio, Uden, The Netherlands), recomWell HEV IgM/IgG (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany), HEV IgM ELISA 3.0, HEV ELISA, HEV ELISA 4.0, Assure HEV IgM Rapid Test (all MP Biomedicals Europe, Illkirch Cedex, France) and Anti-HEV ELISA (IgM/IgG, Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany). The assays showed differences regarding their analytical and diagnostic sensitivities, with anti-HEV IgM assays (n = 5) being more divergent compared to anti-HEV IgG (n = 4) assays in this study. Considerable variations were observed particularly for the detection period of IgM antibodies. This is the first study systematically characterizing serologic assays on the basis of seroconversion panels, providing sample conformity for a conclusive comparison. Future studies should include the assay comparison covering the four different genotypes.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/8/232hepatitis E virusseroconversionIgMIgGserologysensitivity
spellingShingle Tanja Vollmer
Juergen Diekmann
Matthias Eberhardt
Cornelius Knabbe
Jens Dreier
Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
Viruses
hepatitis E virus
seroconversion
IgM
IgG
serology
sensitivity
title Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
title_full Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
title_fullStr Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
title_short Monitoring of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Seroconversion in Asymptomatically Infected Blood Donors: Systematic Comparison of Nine Commercial Anti-HEV IgM and IgG Assays
title_sort monitoring of anti hepatitis e virus antibody seroconversion in asymptomatically infected blood donors systematic comparison of nine commercial anti hev igm and igg assays
topic hepatitis E virus
seroconversion
IgM
IgG
serology
sensitivity
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/8/8/232
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjavollmer monitoringofantihepatitisevirusantibodyseroconversioninasymptomaticallyinfectedblooddonorssystematiccomparisonofninecommercialantihevigmandiggassays
AT juergendiekmann monitoringofantihepatitisevirusantibodyseroconversioninasymptomaticallyinfectedblooddonorssystematiccomparisonofninecommercialantihevigmandiggassays
AT matthiaseberhardt monitoringofantihepatitisevirusantibodyseroconversioninasymptomaticallyinfectedblooddonorssystematiccomparisonofninecommercialantihevigmandiggassays
AT corneliusknabbe monitoringofantihepatitisevirusantibodyseroconversioninasymptomaticallyinfectedblooddonorssystematiccomparisonofninecommercialantihevigmandiggassays
AT jensdreier monitoringofantihepatitisevirusantibodyseroconversioninasymptomaticallyinfectedblooddonorssystematiccomparisonofninecommercialantihevigmandiggassays