Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure

Abstract Aims Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinping Si, Yuxi Sun, Lin Bai, Gary Tse, Zijie Ding, Xinxin Zhang, Yanli Zhang, Xuefu Chen, Yunlong Xia, Ying Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-04-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14590
_version_ 1827307789757710336
author Jinping Si
Yuxi Sun
Lin Bai
Gary Tse
Zijie Ding
Xinxin Zhang
Yanli Zhang
Xuefu Chen
Yunlong Xia
Ying Liu
author_facet Jinping Si
Yuxi Sun
Lin Bai
Gary Tse
Zijie Ding
Xinxin Zhang
Yanli Zhang
Xuefu Chen
Yunlong Xia
Ying Liu
author_sort Jinping Si
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control. Methods and results Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all‐cause mortality and HF‐related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n = 228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post‐matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P = 0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196–2.335], P = 0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all‐cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366–0.983), P = 0.043] and HF‐related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496–0.753), P < 0.001]. In the rhythm control subgroup, E/e′ [odds ratio (OR) 0.878 (95% CI 0.792–0.974), P = 0.014], left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter [OR 0.874 (95% CI 0.777–0.983), P = 0.024], and CHA2DS2‐VASc score (congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and sex category) [OR 0.647 (95% CI 0.438–0.955), P = 0.028] were identified as three independent predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement. Conclusions Rhythm control is associated with improved LVEF trajectory and clinical outcomes and may thus be considered the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with both HF and AF.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:45:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9b9e1edfaa554517919ff1a7f10a0a49
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:45:31Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-9b9e1edfaa554517919ff1a7f10a0a492024-03-27T06:48:03ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222024-04-0111268169110.1002/ehf2.14590Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failureJinping Si0Yuxi Sun1Lin Bai2Gary Tse3Zijie Ding4Xinxin Zhang5Yanli Zhang6Xuefu Chen7Yunlong Xia8Ying Liu9Department of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaDepartment of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Dalian Liaoning ChinaAbstract Aims Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control. Methods and results Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all‐cause mortality and HF‐related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n = 228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post‐matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P = 0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196–2.335], P = 0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all‐cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366–0.983), P = 0.043] and HF‐related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496–0.753), P < 0.001]. In the rhythm control subgroup, E/e′ [odds ratio (OR) 0.878 (95% CI 0.792–0.974), P = 0.014], left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter [OR 0.874 (95% CI 0.777–0.983), P = 0.024], and CHA2DS2‐VASc score (congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and sex category) [OR 0.647 (95% CI 0.438–0.955), P = 0.028] were identified as three independent predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement. Conclusions Rhythm control is associated with improved LVEF trajectory and clinical outcomes and may thus be considered the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with both HF and AF.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14590Left ventricular ejection fractionTrajectoryRhythm controlHeart failureAtrial fibrillation
spellingShingle Jinping Si
Yuxi Sun
Lin Bai
Gary Tse
Zijie Ding
Xinxin Zhang
Yanli Zhang
Xuefu Chen
Yunlong Xia
Ying Liu
Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
ESC Heart Failure
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Trajectory
Rhythm control
Heart failure
Atrial fibrillation
title Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
title_full Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
title_fullStr Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
title_short Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
title_sort trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure
topic Left ventricular ejection fraction
Trajectory
Rhythm control
Heart failure
Atrial fibrillation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14590
work_keys_str_mv AT jinpingsi trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT yuxisun trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT linbai trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT garytse trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT zijieding trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT xinxinzhang trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT yanlizhang trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT xuefuchen trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT yunlongxia trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure
AT yingliu trajectorychangeofleftventricularejectionfractionafterrhythmcontrolforatrialfibrillationinheartfailure