A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lignocaine for the surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. The study focused on pain experience and analgesic consumption. Materials and Methods: Forty patients, aged between 18-45yrs, were selected ea...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=59;epage=72;aulast=Khan;type=0 |
| _version_ | 1819069557417967616 |
|---|---|
| author | Akram Khan Amit Sangle Aruna Tambuwala Shehzad Sheikh Aatif Sayed Gaurav Khutwad |
| author_facet | Akram Khan Amit Sangle Aruna Tambuwala Shehzad Sheikh Aatif Sayed Gaurav Khutwad |
| author_sort | Akram Khan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lignocaine for the surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. The study focused on pain experience and analgesic consumption.
Materials and Methods: Forty patients, aged between 18-45yrs, were selected each with bilateral mandibular third molar indicated for extraction under local anesthesia. The mean age of the patients was 24 years and the ratio of males to females was 23 to 17. All patients randomly received lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000 for one extraction and bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200,000 for the other sided extraction.
Results: The visual analog and global pain scores for both groups were outlined. There was no significant difference between bupivacaine and lidocaine for intra-operative pain experience.
Conclusion: There were no signs or symptoms of central nervous system or cardiovascular system toxicity in this study and the routine use of bupivacaine in oral surgery would appear to be a safe and effective method of producing adequate surgical analgesia and an increased post-operative pain free period. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T16:51:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9b9eebc1180e438a938f8afda203f537 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2347-8128 2347-8128 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T16:51:56Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons |
| spelling | doaj.art-9b9eebc1180e438a938f8afda203f5372022-12-21T18:56:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons2347-81282347-81282015-01-01325972A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgeryAkram KhanAmit SangleAruna TambuwalaShehzad SheikhAatif SayedGaurav KhutwadBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lignocaine for the surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. The study focused on pain experience and analgesic consumption. Materials and Methods: Forty patients, aged between 18-45yrs, were selected each with bilateral mandibular third molar indicated for extraction under local anesthesia. The mean age of the patients was 24 years and the ratio of males to females was 23 to 17. All patients randomly received lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000 for one extraction and bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200,000 for the other sided extraction. Results: The visual analog and global pain scores for both groups were outlined. There was no significant difference between bupivacaine and lidocaine for intra-operative pain experience. Conclusion: There were no signs or symptoms of central nervous system or cardiovascular system toxicity in this study and the routine use of bupivacaine in oral surgery would appear to be a safe and effective method of producing adequate surgical analgesia and an increased post-operative pain free period.http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=59;epage=72;aulast=Khan;type=0BupivacaineImpacted third molarsLignocaineVisual analog scaleGlobal pain scale. |
| spellingShingle | Akram Khan Amit Sangle Aruna Tambuwala Shehzad Sheikh Aatif Sayed Gaurav Khutwad A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons Bupivacaine Impacted third molars Lignocaine Visual analog scale Global pain scale. |
| title | A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| title_full | A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| title_fullStr | A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| title_full_unstemmed | A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| title_short | A clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| title_sort | clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus lidocaine for maxillary and mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery |
| topic | Bupivacaine Impacted third molars Lignocaine Visual analog scale Global pain scale. |
| url | http://www.jhnps.org/article.asp?issn=2347-8128;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=59;epage=72;aulast=Khan;type=0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT akramkhan aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT amitsangle aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT arunatambuwala aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT shehzadsheikh aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT aatifsayed aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT gauravkhutwad aclinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT akramkhan clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT amitsangle clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT arunatambuwala clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT shehzadsheikh clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT aatifsayed clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery AT gauravkhutwad clinicalcomparisonofbupivacaineversuslidocaineformaxillaryandmandibularanesthesiainoralsurgery |