Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review
Abstract Background During the past decade e-oral health technology has been used to address the oral health care challenges in rural and remote settings. This review systematically evaluated the literature on patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote communities. Methods The...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02103-2 |
| _version_ | 1828731827839303680 |
|---|---|
| author | Elham Emami Hermina Harnagea Richa Shrivastava Motahareh Ahmadi Nicolas Giraudeau |
| author_facet | Elham Emami Hermina Harnagea Richa Shrivastava Motahareh Ahmadi Nicolas Giraudeau |
| author_sort | Elham Emami |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background During the past decade e-oral health technology has been used to address the oral health care challenges in rural and remote settings. This review systematically evaluated the literature on patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote communities. Methods The systematic review included interventional and observational studies published between 1946 and 2021, in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health. Patient satisfaction with received oral health care using self-reported measures, at any time after the intervention, was the main outcome of the review. The other primary outcomes were undesirable consequences of the health care (e-health or conventional) such as diagnostic error. The secondary outcomes considered were waiting time, number of visits, travel, and the cost of oral health care. Two independent researchers assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies. Results Among 898 studies, 16 studies were included in the review. In most studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients had shown willingness for teleconsultation for a dental problem and they were mostly satisfied due to saved travel time, saved working days, and prompt treatment onset. Most of the studies acknowledged teledentistry as a cost-effective and cost-saving method. Moreover, the teledentistry consultations showed diagnostic reliability and validity values comparable to conventional dental consultations. The majority of studies were considered level 4 and 3b, due to limited sample populations, analysis based on limited alternatives or costs, non-consistent sensitivity analysis, failure to appropriately control known confounders, and/or failure to carry out an appropriate follow-up of patients. Conclusion Available evidence indicates that e-oral health is associated with higher patient satisfaction and has been found to be an effective and reliable method for patients in rural and remote areas. Therefore, in these areas, the use of e-oral health should be encouraged. However, methodological inconsistencies in the current evidence suggest the need for long-term cohort studies and clinical trials, as well as cost analysis on e-oral health in rural settings. Systematic review registration The systematic review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42016039942. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:52:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9b9f1d57d33e4d61ac4ee17533a9781f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-4053 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:52:01Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Systematic Reviews |
| spelling | doaj.art-9b9f1d57d33e4d61ac4ee17533a9781f2022-12-22T03:22:29ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-10-0111112210.1186/s13643-022-02103-2Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic reviewElham Emami0Hermina Harnagea1Richa Shrivastava2Motahareh Ahmadi3Nicolas Giraudeau4Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill UniversityFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill UniversityFaculty of Dentistry, Université de MontréalFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill UniversityUMR 5112, CEPEL, CNRS, Université de MontpellierAbstract Background During the past decade e-oral health technology has been used to address the oral health care challenges in rural and remote settings. This review systematically evaluated the literature on patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote communities. Methods The systematic review included interventional and observational studies published between 1946 and 2021, in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health. Patient satisfaction with received oral health care using self-reported measures, at any time after the intervention, was the main outcome of the review. The other primary outcomes were undesirable consequences of the health care (e-health or conventional) such as diagnostic error. The secondary outcomes considered were waiting time, number of visits, travel, and the cost of oral health care. Two independent researchers assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies. Results Among 898 studies, 16 studies were included in the review. In most studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients had shown willingness for teleconsultation for a dental problem and they were mostly satisfied due to saved travel time, saved working days, and prompt treatment onset. Most of the studies acknowledged teledentistry as a cost-effective and cost-saving method. Moreover, the teledentistry consultations showed diagnostic reliability and validity values comparable to conventional dental consultations. The majority of studies were considered level 4 and 3b, due to limited sample populations, analysis based on limited alternatives or costs, non-consistent sensitivity analysis, failure to appropriately control known confounders, and/or failure to carry out an appropriate follow-up of patients. Conclusion Available evidence indicates that e-oral health is associated with higher patient satisfaction and has been found to be an effective and reliable method for patients in rural and remote areas. Therefore, in these areas, the use of e-oral health should be encouraged. However, methodological inconsistencies in the current evidence suggest the need for long-term cohort studies and clinical trials, as well as cost analysis on e-oral health in rural settings. Systematic review registration The systematic review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42016039942.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02103-2e-healthe-oral health, TeledentistryRural and remote communitiesPatient satisfaction |
| spellingShingle | Elham Emami Hermina Harnagea Richa Shrivastava Motahareh Ahmadi Nicolas Giraudeau Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review Systematic Reviews e-health e-oral health, Teledentistry Rural and remote communities Patient satisfaction |
| title | Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review |
| title_full | Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review |
| title_short | Patient satisfaction with e-oral health care in rural and remote settings: a systematic review |
| title_sort | patient satisfaction with e oral health care in rural and remote settings a systematic review |
| topic | e-health e-oral health, Teledentistry Rural and remote communities Patient satisfaction |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02103-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elhamemami patientsatisfactionwitheoralhealthcareinruralandremotesettingsasystematicreview AT herminaharnagea patientsatisfactionwitheoralhealthcareinruralandremotesettingsasystematicreview AT richashrivastava patientsatisfactionwitheoralhealthcareinruralandremotesettingsasystematicreview AT motaharehahmadi patientsatisfactionwitheoralhealthcareinruralandremotesettingsasystematicreview AT nicolasgiraudeau patientsatisfactionwitheoralhealthcareinruralandremotesettingsasystematicreview |