Low Reporting of Cointerventions in Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
Background A cointervention in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) is medical care given in addition to the tested intervention. If cointerventions are unbalanced between trial arms, the results may be biased. We hypothesized that cointerventions would be more adequately reported in RCTs without full...
Main Authors: | Elisavet Moutzouri, Luise Adam, Martin Feller, Lamprini Syrogiannouli, Bruno R. Da Costa, Cinzia Del Giovane, Douglas C. Bauer, Drahomir Aujesky, Arnaud Chiolero, Nicolas Rodondi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014890 |
Similar Items
-
Inadequate Reporting of Cointerventions, Other Methodological Factors, and Treatment Estimates in Cardiovascular Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
by: Jonas Bührer, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Lipid‐Lowering Trials Are Not Representative of Patients Managed in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Exclusion Criteria
by: Martina Aeschbacher‐Germann, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Random guess and wishful thinking are the best blinding scenarios
by: Heejung Bang
Published: (2016-08-01) -
How to prevent overdiagnosis
by: Arnaud Chiolero, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Blinding in Clinical Trials: Seeing the Big Picture
by: Thomas F. Monaghan, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)