Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling
Composite is usually a mixture of two phases. The composites used in dentistry have high durability. The individual properties of each phase are important to increase the mechanical property of the composite. This study aimed to determine the surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorat...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=6;spage=466;epage=469;aulast=Imtiaz |
_version_ | 1797954945511587840 |
---|---|
author | Taanya Imtiaz S Balaji Ganesh S Jayalakshmi |
author_facet | Taanya Imtiaz S Balaji Ganesh S Jayalakshmi |
author_sort | Taanya Imtiaz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Composite is usually a mixture of two phases. The composites used in dentistry have high durability. The individual properties of each phase are important to increase the mechanical property of the composite. This study aimed to determine the surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling. Two of the commercially available composites were chosen (RestoFill and SwissTEC). The composite disks of dimension 10 mm diameter and 3 mm height were prepared using silicone molds, and every increment was light cured for 30 s. A stylus profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness prethermocycling, and then, the disks were subjected to an integrated thermocycler (T.S-4.4) for 1000 cycles. The postsurface roughness was obtained after the thermocycling process using the same stylus profilometer. The surface parameter values before and after thermocycling of the SwissTEC sample is less than that of RestoFill. There was a significant difference between the Rz and Rq values of the two different commercially available composite materials. Thus, the present study concludes that thermocycling influenced the surface roughness of composite resin and increased the surface roughness of both the RestoFill and SwissTEC composites. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T23:26:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9baef506ec4f4327ad33a1061e78db99 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2231-4040 0976-2094 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T23:26:37Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research |
spelling | doaj.art-9baef506ec4f4327ad33a1061e78db992023-01-12T12:18:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research2231-40400976-20942022-01-0113646646910.4103/japtr.japtr_255_22Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocyclingTaanya ImtiazS Balaji GaneshS JayalakshmiComposite is usually a mixture of two phases. The composites used in dentistry have high durability. The individual properties of each phase are important to increase the mechanical property of the composite. This study aimed to determine the surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling. Two of the commercially available composites were chosen (RestoFill and SwissTEC). The composite disks of dimension 10 mm diameter and 3 mm height were prepared using silicone molds, and every increment was light cured for 30 s. A stylus profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness prethermocycling, and then, the disks were subjected to an integrated thermocycler (T.S-4.4) for 1000 cycles. The postsurface roughness was obtained after the thermocycling process using the same stylus profilometer. The surface parameter values before and after thermocycling of the SwissTEC sample is less than that of RestoFill. There was a significant difference between the Rz and Rq values of the two different commercially available composite materials. Thus, the present study concludes that thermocycling influenced the surface roughness of composite resin and increased the surface roughness of both the RestoFill and SwissTEC composites.http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=6;spage=466;epage=469;aulast=Imtiazcomposite resininnovative measurementsurface roughnessthermocycling |
spellingShingle | Taanya Imtiaz S Balaji Ganesh S Jayalakshmi Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research composite resin innovative measurement surface roughness thermocycling |
title | Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
title_full | Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
title_fullStr | Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
title_short | Surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
title_sort | surface roughness changes of two composite resin restorative materials after thermocycling |
topic | composite resin innovative measurement surface roughness thermocycling |
url | http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=6;spage=466;epage=469;aulast=Imtiaz |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taanyaimtiaz surfaceroughnesschangesoftwocompositeresinrestorativematerialsafterthermocycling AT sbalajiganesh surfaceroughnesschangesoftwocompositeresinrestorativematerialsafterthermocycling AT sjayalakshmi surfaceroughnesschangesoftwocompositeresinrestorativematerialsafterthermocycling |