Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study

Background The preferred management strategy for difficult airways is awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation, which requires effective airway anesthesia to ensure patient comfort and acceptance. This randomized single-blind prospective study was conducted to compare lignocaine nebulization...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pooja Rawat Mathur, Neena Jain, Aji Kumar, Beena Thada, Veena Mathur, Deepak Garg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2018-04-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-2018-71-2-120.pdf
_version_ 1818605737845194752
author Pooja Rawat Mathur
Neena Jain
Aji Kumar
Beena Thada
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
author_facet Pooja Rawat Mathur
Neena Jain
Aji Kumar
Beena Thada
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
author_sort Pooja Rawat Mathur
collection DOAJ
description Background The preferred management strategy for difficult airways is awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation, which requires effective airway anesthesia to ensure patient comfort and acceptance. This randomized single-blind prospective study was conducted to compare lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for airway anesthesia prior to awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation. Methods Sixty adult patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. Group N received jet nebulization (10 ml of 4% lignocaine) and Group B received bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal nerve blocks (each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine) followed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation. All patients received procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine. The intubation time, intubating conditions, vocal cord position, cough severity, and degree of patient satisfaction were recorded. Student’s t test was used to analyze parametric data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied to non-parametric data and Fisher’s test to categorical data. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The time taken for intubation was significantly shorter in Group B [115.2 (14.7) s compared with Group N [214.0 (22.2) s] (P = 0.029). The intubating conditions and degree of patient comfort were better in Group B compared with Group N. Although all patients were successfully intubated, patient satisfaction was higher in Group B. Conclusions Airway nerve blocks are preferable to lignocaine nebulization as they provide superior-quality airway anesthesia. However, nebulization may be a suitable alternative when a nerve block is not feasible.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:59:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9bb5e51520524b94a156b14001a0b860
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:59:43Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format Article
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-9bb5e51520524b94a156b14001a0b8602022-12-21T22:29:06ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632018-04-0171212012610.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.1208392Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective studyPooja Rawat MathurNeena JainAji KumarBeena ThadaVeena MathurDeepak GargBackground The preferred management strategy for difficult airways is awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation, which requires effective airway anesthesia to ensure patient comfort and acceptance. This randomized single-blind prospective study was conducted to compare lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for airway anesthesia prior to awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided intubation. Methods Sixty adult patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. Group N received jet nebulization (10 ml of 4% lignocaine) and Group B received bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal nerve blocks (each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine) followed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation. All patients received procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine. The intubation time, intubating conditions, vocal cord position, cough severity, and degree of patient satisfaction were recorded. Student’s t test was used to analyze parametric data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied to non-parametric data and Fisher’s test to categorical data. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The time taken for intubation was significantly shorter in Group B [115.2 (14.7) s compared with Group N [214.0 (22.2) s] (P = 0.029). The intubating conditions and degree of patient comfort were better in Group B compared with Group N. Although all patients were successfully intubated, patient satisfaction was higher in Group B. Conclusions Airway nerve blocks are preferable to lignocaine nebulization as they provide superior-quality airway anesthesia. However, nebulization may be a suitable alternative when a nerve block is not feasible.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-2018-71-2-120.pdfairway managementdexmedetomidineintubationlignocainenebulizersnerve block
spellingShingle Pooja Rawat Mathur
Neena Jain
Aji Kumar
Beena Thada
Veena Mathur
Deepak Garg
Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
airway management
dexmedetomidine
intubation
lignocaine
nebulizers
nerve block
title Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
title_full Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
title_fullStr Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
title_short Comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided nasotracheal intubation: a single-blind randomized prospective study
title_sort comparison between lignocaine nebulization and airway nerve block for awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy guided nasotracheal intubation a single blind randomized prospective study
topic airway management
dexmedetomidine
intubation
lignocaine
nebulizers
nerve block
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-2018-71-2-120.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT poojarawatmathur comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy
AT neenajain comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy
AT ajikumar comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy
AT beenathada comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy
AT veenamathur comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy
AT deepakgarg comparisonbetweenlignocainenebulizationandairwaynerveblockforawakefiberopticbronchoscopyguidednasotrachealintubationasingleblindrandomizedprospectivestudy