Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity
In his Vulnerable World Hypothesis Nick Bostrom recently compared invention to drawing balls out of a giant urn containing at least one black ball (i.e. an invention that would destroy civilization). If this hypothesis is correct, there is a need to assess the global catastrophic risk associated wit...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Sustainable Futures |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000157 |
| _version_ | 1797320904680669184 |
|---|---|
| author | John-Oliver Engler Jan Niklas Fischer |
| author_facet | John-Oliver Engler Jan Niklas Fischer |
| author_sort | John-Oliver Engler |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In his Vulnerable World Hypothesis Nick Bostrom recently compared invention to drawing balls out of a giant urn containing at least one black ball (i.e. an invention that would destroy civilization). If this hypothesis is correct, there is a need to assess the global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity. Here, drawing on the theory of zero-failure data, we develop two methods capable of addressing this question. The first method uses a Monte Carlo simulation approach, the second method focusses on analytical derivation of the survival function. Taking past global patenting activity as a proxy for human ingenuity, we draw on available patenting data and model different future scenarios for the annual number of technological inventions to provide upper boundaries (method 1) or point estimates (method 2) for the annual probability of pulling out a black ball for the next 1000 years. While there are clear limitations in terms of data and the urn model's conceptual framing, both methods successfully enable first approximations of global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:49:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9bb8a849298d4685b7097e16a92e97ce |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-1888 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:49:48Z |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sustainable Futures |
| spelling | doaj.art-9bb8a849298d4685b7097e16a92e97ce2024-02-08T05:17:12ZengElsevierSustainable Futures2666-18882024-06-017100165Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuityJohn-Oliver Engler0Jan Niklas Fischer1Faculty II, Professorship (W1) of Bioeconomy and Resource Efficiency, Vechta Institute of Sustainability Transformations in Rural Areas, University of Vechta, Driverstraße 22, Vechta D-49377, Germany; Corresponding author.Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, Lüneburg D-21335, GermanyIn his Vulnerable World Hypothesis Nick Bostrom recently compared invention to drawing balls out of a giant urn containing at least one black ball (i.e. an invention that would destroy civilization). If this hypothesis is correct, there is a need to assess the global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity. Here, drawing on the theory of zero-failure data, we develop two methods capable of addressing this question. The first method uses a Monte Carlo simulation approach, the second method focusses on analytical derivation of the survival function. Taking past global patenting activity as a proxy for human ingenuity, we draw on available patenting data and model different future scenarios for the annual number of technological inventions to provide upper boundaries (method 1) or point estimates (method 2) for the annual probability of pulling out a black ball for the next 1000 years. While there are clear limitations in terms of data and the urn model's conceptual framing, both methods successfully enable first approximations of global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000157Anthropic reasoningExistential riskGlobal catastrophic riskHuman extinctionSustainabilityVulnerable world hypothesis |
| spellingShingle | John-Oliver Engler Jan Niklas Fischer Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity Sustainable Futures Anthropic reasoning Existential risk Global catastrophic risk Human extinction Sustainability Vulnerable world hypothesis |
| title | Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| title_full | Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| title_fullStr | Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| title_short | Drawing blanks and winning: Quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| title_sort | drawing blanks and winning quantifying global catastrophic risk associated with human ingenuity |
| topic | Anthropic reasoning Existential risk Global catastrophic risk Human extinction Sustainability Vulnerable world hypothesis |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000157 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johnoliverengler drawingblanksandwinningquantifyingglobalcatastrophicriskassociatedwithhumaningenuity AT janniklasfischer drawingblanksandwinningquantifyingglobalcatastrophicriskassociatedwithhumaningenuity |