Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

Abstract Aims There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. Methods and res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Rapacciuolo, Saverio Iacopino, Antonio D'Onofrio, Antonio Curnis, Ennio C. Pisanò, Mauro Biffi, Paolo Della Bella, Antonio Dello Russo, Fabrizio Caravati, Gabriele Zanotto, Valeria Calvi, Giovanni Rovaris, Gaetano Senatore, Daniele Nicolis, Matteo Santamaria, Massimo Giammaria, Giampiero Maglia, Antonio Duca, Giuseppe Ammirati, Salvo Andrea Romano, Marcello Piacenti, Eduardo Celentano, Giovanni Bisignani, Paola Vaccaro, Gennaro Miracapillo, Matteo Bertini, Gerardo Nigro, Daniele Giacopelli, Alessio Gargaro, Caterina Bisceglia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599
_version_ 1817988046805532672
author Antonio Rapacciuolo
Saverio Iacopino
Antonio D'Onofrio
Antonio Curnis
Ennio C. Pisanò
Mauro Biffi
Paolo Della Bella
Antonio Dello Russo
Fabrizio Caravati
Gabriele Zanotto
Valeria Calvi
Giovanni Rovaris
Gaetano Senatore
Daniele Nicolis
Matteo Santamaria
Massimo Giammaria
Giampiero Maglia
Antonio Duca
Giuseppe Ammirati
Salvo Andrea Romano
Marcello Piacenti
Eduardo Celentano
Giovanni Bisignani
Paola Vaccaro
Gennaro Miracapillo
Matteo Bertini
Gerardo Nigro
Daniele Giacopelli
Alessio Gargaro
Caterina Bisceglia
author_facet Antonio Rapacciuolo
Saverio Iacopino
Antonio D'Onofrio
Antonio Curnis
Ennio C. Pisanò
Mauro Biffi
Paolo Della Bella
Antonio Dello Russo
Fabrizio Caravati
Gabriele Zanotto
Valeria Calvi
Giovanni Rovaris
Gaetano Senatore
Daniele Nicolis
Matteo Santamaria
Massimo Giammaria
Giampiero Maglia
Antonio Duca
Giuseppe Ammirati
Salvo Andrea Romano
Marcello Piacenti
Eduardo Celentano
Giovanni Bisignani
Paola Vaccaro
Gennaro Miracapillo
Matteo Bertini
Gerardo Nigro
Daniele Giacopelli
Alessio Gargaro
Caterina Bisceglia
author_sort Antonio Rapacciuolo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years. Conclusions Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:29:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9bbc018beb494779b3a67198a06ba984
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:29:21Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-9bbc018beb494779b3a67198a06ba9842022-12-22T02:22:36ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222021-12-01865204521210.1002/ehf2.13599Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillationAntonio Rapacciuolo0Saverio Iacopino1Antonio D'Onofrio2Antonio Curnis3Ennio C. Pisanò4Mauro Biffi5Paolo Della Bella6Antonio Dello Russo7Fabrizio Caravati8Gabriele Zanotto9Valeria Calvi10Giovanni Rovaris11Gaetano Senatore12Daniele Nicolis13Matteo Santamaria14Massimo Giammaria15Giampiero Maglia16Antonio Duca17Giuseppe Ammirati18Salvo Andrea Romano19Marcello Piacenti20Eduardo Celentano21Giovanni Bisignani22Paola Vaccaro23Gennaro Miracapillo24Matteo Bertini25Gerardo Nigro26Daniele Giacopelli27Alessio Gargaro28Caterina Bisceglia29Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Federico II University of Naples Corso Umberto I, 40 Naples 80138 ItalyVilla Maria Care & Research Cotignola ItalyOspedale Monaldi Naples ItalySpedali Civili Brescia ItalyOspedale Vito Fazzi Lecce ItalyPoliclinico Sant'Orsola‐Malpighi Bologna ItalyIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan ItalyOspedali Riuniti Ancona ItalyASST dei sette laghi, Ospedale di Circolo Varese ItalyOspedale Mater Salutis Legnago ItalyPoliclinico G. Rodolico, Az. O.U. Policlinico ‐ V. Emanuele Catania ItalyOspedale San Gerardo Monza ItalyOspedale di Ciriè Ciriè ItalyOspedale di Mantova Mantova ItalyGemelli Molise Hospital Campobasso ItalyOspedale Maria Vittoria Torino ItalyAzienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio Catanzaro ItalyIRCCS Neurolesi‐Ospedale Piemonte Messina ItalyDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences Federico II University of Naples Corso Umberto I, 40 Naples 80138 ItalyOspedale di Desio Desio ItalyFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio Pisa ItalyHumanitas Gavazzeni Bergamo ItalyOspedale “Ferrari” Castrovillari ItalyAOR Villa Sofia‐Cervello P.O. Cervello Palermo ItalyOspedale di Grosseto Grosseto ItalyUniversity of Ferrara, S. Anna Hospital Ferrara ItalyUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Monaldi Hospital Naples ItalyBiotronik Italia S.p.a. Vimodrone ItalyBiotronik Italia S.p.a. Vimodrone ItalyIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan ItalyAbstract Aims There are conflicting data on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of permanent AF at device implantation. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed remote monitoring data from 1141 CRT defibrillators. Propensity score with inverse‐probability weighting method was used to balance AF and sinus rhythm (SR) groups. Analysis endpoints included total mortality, appropriate defibrillation shocks, and CRT percentage. There were 229 patients (20.1%) in the AF group and 912 patients (79.9%) in the SR group. Compared with SR patients, AF patients were older (median age, 77 vs. 72 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (82.5% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.02), and had higher heart rate (75.7 vs. 71.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001). Of the 229 AF patients, 162 (70.7%) received suboptimal CRT (<98%) and 67 (29.3%) had adequate CRT (≥98%). During a median follow‐up of 24 months, total mortality did not differ between AF and SR groups (propensity‐score‐weighted hazard ratio, HR 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.15], P = 0.25). The risk of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in the AF group with <98% CRT than in the SR group (weighted‐HR, 1.99 [1.21–3.26], P = 0.006) and was similar in the AF group with ≥98% CRT versus the SR group (1.29 [0.66–2.53], P = 0.45). During follow‐up, sinus rhythm was recovered in 23 patients in the AF group (10%) after a median time of 106 (42–256) days. The rate of sinus rhythm recovery in the AF group was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8–6.7) per 100 patient‐years; the rate of permanent AF occurrence in the SR group was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.9–3.3) per 100 patient‐years. Conclusions Although mortality was similar across patient groups, patients with permanent AF and suboptimal CRT had twofold higher risk of appropriate shocks than SR patients or AF patients with CRT ≥ 98%.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599Atrial fibrillationCardiac resynchronization therapyHeart failureHeart rateDefibrillation shock
spellingShingle Antonio Rapacciuolo
Saverio Iacopino
Antonio D'Onofrio
Antonio Curnis
Ennio C. Pisanò
Mauro Biffi
Paolo Della Bella
Antonio Dello Russo
Fabrizio Caravati
Gabriele Zanotto
Valeria Calvi
Giovanni Rovaris
Gaetano Senatore
Daniele Nicolis
Matteo Santamaria
Massimo Giammaria
Giampiero Maglia
Antonio Duca
Giuseppe Ammirati
Salvo Andrea Romano
Marcello Piacenti
Eduardo Celentano
Giovanni Bisignani
Paola Vaccaro
Gennaro Miracapillo
Matteo Bertini
Gerardo Nigro
Daniele Giacopelli
Alessio Gargaro
Caterina Bisceglia
Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
ESC Heart Failure
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Heart failure
Heart rate
Defibrillation shock
title Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
title_full Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
title_short Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
title_sort cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
topic Atrial fibrillation
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Heart failure
Heart rate
Defibrillation shock
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13599
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniorapacciuolo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT saverioiacopino cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT antoniodonofrio cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT antoniocurnis cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT enniocpisano cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT maurobiffi cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT paolodellabella cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT antoniodellorusso cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT fabriziocaravati cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT gabrielezanotto cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT valeriacalvi cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT giovannirovaris cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT gaetanosenatore cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT danielenicolis cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT matteosantamaria cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT massimogiammaria cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT giampieromaglia cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT antonioduca cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT giuseppeammirati cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT salvoandrearomano cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT marcellopiacenti cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT eduardocelentano cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT giovannibisignani cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT paolavaccaro cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT gennaromiracapillo cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT matteobertini cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT gerardonigro cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT danielegiacopelli cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT alessiogargaro cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation
AT caterinabisceglia cardiacresynchronizationtherapydefibrillatorsinpatientswithpermanentatrialfibrillation