Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting

Abstract Background Ototoxicity monitoring is uncommon in South Africa, despite the increased use of ototoxic medication to manage the burden of disease in the country. The successful implementation of such a protocol requires cognisance of contextual realities and multiple dimensions for considerat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Paken, Cyril D. Govender, Mershen Pillay, Vikash Sewram
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08099-8
_version_ 1811344951786602496
author Jessica Paken
Cyril D. Govender
Mershen Pillay
Vikash Sewram
author_facet Jessica Paken
Cyril D. Govender
Mershen Pillay
Vikash Sewram
author_sort Jessica Paken
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ototoxicity monitoring is uncommon in South Africa, despite the increased use of ototoxic medication to manage the burden of disease in the country. The successful implementation of such a protocol requires cognisance of contextual realities and multiple dimensions for consideration from both patients and service providers. As part of an ongoing cohort study on cisplatin-associated ototoxicity and efforts to better inform the implementation of such programmes, the perspectives of cervical cancer patients and healthcare workers towards ototoxicity monitoring were assessed. Methods This concurrent-triangulation mixed-methods study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Self-reported questionnaires from patients (n = 80) and healthcare personnel comprising clinicians, oncology nurses, pharmacists, and radiotherapists (n = 32), results of audiological evaluations, researcher field notes, and estimated patient and service provider costs contributed to data for this study. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, comparison of test characteristics and deductive thematic analysis. Results The ototoxicity monitoring programme was positively received by the participants, with 90.6% of healthcare personnel and 89% of patients reporting it to be beneficial. The clinicians (76.6%) were identified as the main providers of information on the effects of chemotherapy medication and made the necessary referrals for audiological evaluation. The approximate cost of setting up such a programme included purchase of equipment (US56 700) and the appointment of an audiologist (US 26 250). The approximate costs to patients included transport costs (US$ 38) and the loss of income for the day (US 60), calculated at the minimum wage per hour, if employed. Creative appointment scheduling, easy facility access and detailed locally comprehensible couselling improved patient compliance to the programme. Whilst the sequential use of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) criteria aided in an evidence-informed approach to aural rehabilitation, DPOAEs and speech discrimination displayed low sensitivity (range 1.45% – 22.39%) but high specificity (range 77.78% – 100%) when identifying ototoxic change. Conclusion This novel study, through a ‘real-world’ experience, has revealed that an ototoxicity monitoring programme is feasible in South Africa, through meaningful engagements with- and considerations from- patients and service providers regarding planning, delineation of responsibilities and cost implications. The findings can potentially serve as a roadmap for other limited resource environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:55:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9bdbd501e4ad495cb9b13a564cc049d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:55:43Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-9bdbd501e4ad495cb9b13a564cc049d42022-12-22T02:32:21ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-06-0122111410.1186/s12913-022-08099-8Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare settingJessica Paken0Cyril D. Govender1Mershen Pillay2Vikash Sewram3Discipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-NatalDiscipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-NatalDiscipline of Audiology, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-NatalAfrican Cancer Institute, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch UniversityAbstract Background Ototoxicity monitoring is uncommon in South Africa, despite the increased use of ototoxic medication to manage the burden of disease in the country. The successful implementation of such a protocol requires cognisance of contextual realities and multiple dimensions for consideration from both patients and service providers. As part of an ongoing cohort study on cisplatin-associated ototoxicity and efforts to better inform the implementation of such programmes, the perspectives of cervical cancer patients and healthcare workers towards ototoxicity monitoring were assessed. Methods This concurrent-triangulation mixed-methods study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Self-reported questionnaires from patients (n = 80) and healthcare personnel comprising clinicians, oncology nurses, pharmacists, and radiotherapists (n = 32), results of audiological evaluations, researcher field notes, and estimated patient and service provider costs contributed to data for this study. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, comparison of test characteristics and deductive thematic analysis. Results The ototoxicity monitoring programme was positively received by the participants, with 90.6% of healthcare personnel and 89% of patients reporting it to be beneficial. The clinicians (76.6%) were identified as the main providers of information on the effects of chemotherapy medication and made the necessary referrals for audiological evaluation. The approximate cost of setting up such a programme included purchase of equipment (US56 700) and the appointment of an audiologist (US 26 250). The approximate costs to patients included transport costs (US$ 38) and the loss of income for the day (US 60), calculated at the minimum wage per hour, if employed. Creative appointment scheduling, easy facility access and detailed locally comprehensible couselling improved patient compliance to the programme. Whilst the sequential use of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) criteria aided in an evidence-informed approach to aural rehabilitation, DPOAEs and speech discrimination displayed low sensitivity (range 1.45% – 22.39%) but high specificity (range 77.78% – 100%) when identifying ototoxic change. Conclusion This novel study, through a ‘real-world’ experience, has revealed that an ototoxicity monitoring programme is feasible in South Africa, through meaningful engagements with- and considerations from- patients and service providers regarding planning, delineation of responsibilities and cost implications. The findings can potentially serve as a roadmap for other limited resource environments.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08099-8Audiological assessmentOtotoxicityMonitoring programmeCisplatinCervical cancerSouth Africa
spellingShingle Jessica Paken
Cyril D. Govender
Mershen Pillay
Vikash Sewram
Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
BMC Health Services Research
Audiological assessment
Ototoxicity
Monitoring programme
Cisplatin
Cervical cancer
South Africa
title Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
title_full Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
title_fullStr Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
title_full_unstemmed Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
title_short Cisplatin-associated ototoxicity: perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
title_sort cisplatin associated ototoxicity perspectives from a single institution cervical cancer cohort and implications for developing a locally responsive monitoring programme in a public healthcare setting
topic Audiological assessment
Ototoxicity
Monitoring programme
Cisplatin
Cervical cancer
South Africa
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08099-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicapaken cisplatinassociatedototoxicityperspectivesfromasingleinstitutioncervicalcancercohortandimplicationsfordevelopingalocallyresponsivemonitoringprogrammeinapublichealthcaresetting
AT cyrildgovender cisplatinassociatedototoxicityperspectivesfromasingleinstitutioncervicalcancercohortandimplicationsfordevelopingalocallyresponsivemonitoringprogrammeinapublichealthcaresetting
AT mershenpillay cisplatinassociatedototoxicityperspectivesfromasingleinstitutioncervicalcancercohortandimplicationsfordevelopingalocallyresponsivemonitoringprogrammeinapublichealthcaresetting
AT vikashsewram cisplatinassociatedototoxicityperspectivesfromasingleinstitutioncervicalcancercohortandimplicationsfordevelopingalocallyresponsivemonitoringprogrammeinapublichealthcaresetting