Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation

Abstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is the mainstay of surgical management of patients with hydrocephalus. The insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be accompanied by many potentially life-threatening complications including shunt infection. Concerted efforts have been made to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Surajudeen A. Olomo, Joseph O. Obande, Gyang M. Bot, Peter O. Binitie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-11-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00249-2
_version_ 1797577456427728896
author Surajudeen A. Olomo
Joseph O. Obande
Gyang M. Bot
Peter O. Binitie
author_facet Surajudeen A. Olomo
Joseph O. Obande
Gyang M. Bot
Peter O. Binitie
author_sort Surajudeen A. Olomo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is the mainstay of surgical management of patients with hydrocephalus. The insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be accompanied by many potentially life-threatening complications including shunt infection. Concerted efforts have been made to reduce shunt infection rates, including use of saline- antibiotic solutions containing antibiotics such as Gentamicin, mixture of Gentamicin and Vancomycin in shunt system preparation. We therefore set out to determine the infection rates following the use of intraoperative Gentamicin and Vancomycin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation and compare the infection rates. Therefore, a randomized single blind comparative study was carried out for a period of seventeen months, among 56 patients that presented to 2 tertiary health centers in Nigeria diagnosed of hydrocephalus. Patients were randomized into Vancomycin- and Gentamicin-shunt preparation groups. The outcome measure was postoperative shunt infection rates. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version) 21. Group comparisons were made using the Student's t-test for numerical variables, and chi-square test or fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was inferred at p-value < 0.05. Result Fifty-six patients were included in the study. One patient was lost to follow-up in Vancomycin group. Another patient died in Gentamicin group of sudden death without the patient exhibiting symptoms of shunt infection leaving a total of 54 for analysis. All the patients included in the study were followed up for six months. Their mean ages were between 1688.5 ± 665.3 (days) for Vancomycin group and 10,222 ± 6635.8 (days) for Gentamicin group. There was male preponderance of 55.6% as against female of 44.4%. Majority of the hydrocephalus were of congenital cause accounting for 64.8%. There was one shunt infection in the Gentamicin group giving rise to an infection rate of 1.9% which was not statistically significant (P –value—0.313). The organism isolated was Pseudomonas species. Conclusion Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection rates can be reduced to the barest minimum if standard concentration of antibiotics is used to prepare the shunt hardware employing a standard surgical technique.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:09:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9be266c87f2c4c28a2c85cc568b03e89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2520-8225
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:09:33Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
spelling doaj.art-9be266c87f2c4c28a2c85cc568b03e892023-11-19T12:41:36ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Journal of Neurosurgery2520-82252023-11-013811910.1186/s41984-023-00249-2Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparationSurajudeen A. Olomo0Joseph O. Obande1Gyang M. Bot2Peter O. Binitie3Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Abuja Teaching HospitalDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Abuja Teaching HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, Jos University Teaching HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, Jos University Teaching HospitalAbstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is the mainstay of surgical management of patients with hydrocephalus. The insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be accompanied by many potentially life-threatening complications including shunt infection. Concerted efforts have been made to reduce shunt infection rates, including use of saline- antibiotic solutions containing antibiotics such as Gentamicin, mixture of Gentamicin and Vancomycin in shunt system preparation. We therefore set out to determine the infection rates following the use of intraoperative Gentamicin and Vancomycin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation and compare the infection rates. Therefore, a randomized single blind comparative study was carried out for a period of seventeen months, among 56 patients that presented to 2 tertiary health centers in Nigeria diagnosed of hydrocephalus. Patients were randomized into Vancomycin- and Gentamicin-shunt preparation groups. The outcome measure was postoperative shunt infection rates. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version) 21. Group comparisons were made using the Student's t-test for numerical variables, and chi-square test or fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was inferred at p-value < 0.05. Result Fifty-six patients were included in the study. One patient was lost to follow-up in Vancomycin group. Another patient died in Gentamicin group of sudden death without the patient exhibiting symptoms of shunt infection leaving a total of 54 for analysis. All the patients included in the study were followed up for six months. Their mean ages were between 1688.5 ± 665.3 (days) for Vancomycin group and 10,222 ± 6635.8 (days) for Gentamicin group. There was male preponderance of 55.6% as against female of 44.4%. Majority of the hydrocephalus were of congenital cause accounting for 64.8%. There was one shunt infection in the Gentamicin group giving rise to an infection rate of 1.9% which was not statistically significant (P –value—0.313). The organism isolated was Pseudomonas species. Conclusion Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection rates can be reduced to the barest minimum if standard concentration of antibiotics is used to prepare the shunt hardware employing a standard surgical technique.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00249-2Ventriculoperitoneal shuntShunt infectionVancomycinGentamicin
spellingShingle Surajudeen A. Olomo
Joseph O. Obande
Gyang M. Bot
Peter O. Binitie
Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Shunt infection
Vancomycin
Gentamicin
title Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
title_full Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
title_fullStr Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
title_full_unstemmed Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
title_short Randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative Vancomycin versus Gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
title_sort randomized trial of shunt infection rates comparing intraoperative vancomycin versus gentamicin in ventriculoperitoneal shunt system preparation
topic Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Shunt infection
Vancomycin
Gentamicin
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00249-2
work_keys_str_mv AT surajudeenaolomo randomizedtrialofshuntinfectionratescomparingintraoperativevancomycinversusgentamicininventriculoperitonealshuntsystempreparation
AT josephoobande randomizedtrialofshuntinfectionratescomparingintraoperativevancomycinversusgentamicininventriculoperitonealshuntsystempreparation
AT gyangmbot randomizedtrialofshuntinfectionratescomparingintraoperativevancomycinversusgentamicininventriculoperitonealshuntsystempreparation
AT peterobinitie randomizedtrialofshuntinfectionratescomparingintraoperativevancomycinversusgentamicininventriculoperitonealshuntsystempreparation