Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast

Compensatory wetland restoration is a critical component of holistic, ecosystem-level oil spill response strategies. An important goal of restoration is to rehabilitate food webs in impacted areas, but faunal assemblages and trophic dynamics are rarely included in post-restoration monitoring or asse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna R. Armitage, Janelle A. Goeke, Chuan-Kai Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.965557/full
_version_ 1817982435803004928
author Anna R. Armitage
Janelle A. Goeke
Chuan-Kai Ho
author_facet Anna R. Armitage
Janelle A. Goeke
Chuan-Kai Ho
author_sort Anna R. Armitage
collection DOAJ
description Compensatory wetland restoration is a critical component of holistic, ecosystem-level oil spill response strategies. An important goal of restoration is to rehabilitate food webs in impacted areas, but faunal assemblages and trophic dynamics are rarely included in post-restoration monitoring or assessments of success. Different approaches to wetland restoration, including variations in construction technique, may influence faunal recovery and trophic interactions. To explore these dynamics, we compared emergent plant communities, terrestrial arthropod assemblages, and trophic interactions in restored emergent marshes that were constructed in terrace and mound configurations and in reference areas in the Lower Neches Wildlife Management Area (Texas, United States). Plant community composition differed among all habitat types, with higher diversity on terraces and in reference marshes. Terrestrial arthropod abundance was similar among habitat types, but species composition was distinctly different among habitat types, especially at the herbivore level, where four of the eight herbivore species were found in either reference or restored sites, but not in both habitat types. Herbivores (primarily beetles and planthoppers) were more abundant than detritivores (midges and flies) in all habitat types. Predator (web-building and hunting spiders) abundance and species identity were similar among habitat types. Based on stable isotope analysis, trophic relationships differed among mounds, terraces, and reference areas. Herbivore diets were more variable at the reference sites than in either restored habitat type, aligning with higher plant diversity in reference areas. In contrast, detritivore diets were more variable at restored sites, where they were likely consuming food sources such as benthic algae or sediment organic matter. Predator diets were primarily comprised of herbivores in reference areas and detritivores in restored habitats. Overall, the restoration approaches supported abundant terrestrial arthropod assemblages, but species composition was different. In addition, trophic relationships differed between restored and reference areas, in part due to unique plant species assemblages at restored and reference sites. These results suggest that ecosystem restoration strategies that introduce geomorphological heterogeneity and plant diversity are more likely to support a diverse array of species and functions.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:20:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9beb5e4b41ac4f9b84ca222e391580b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:20:47Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-9beb5e4b41ac4f9b84ca222e391580b02022-12-22T02:25:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2022-10-011010.3389/fenvs.2022.965557965557Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas CoastAnna R. Armitage0Janelle A. Goeke1Chuan-Kai Ho2Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United StatesInstitute of Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United StatesInstitute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, TaiwanCompensatory wetland restoration is a critical component of holistic, ecosystem-level oil spill response strategies. An important goal of restoration is to rehabilitate food webs in impacted areas, but faunal assemblages and trophic dynamics are rarely included in post-restoration monitoring or assessments of success. Different approaches to wetland restoration, including variations in construction technique, may influence faunal recovery and trophic interactions. To explore these dynamics, we compared emergent plant communities, terrestrial arthropod assemblages, and trophic interactions in restored emergent marshes that were constructed in terrace and mound configurations and in reference areas in the Lower Neches Wildlife Management Area (Texas, United States). Plant community composition differed among all habitat types, with higher diversity on terraces and in reference marshes. Terrestrial arthropod abundance was similar among habitat types, but species composition was distinctly different among habitat types, especially at the herbivore level, where four of the eight herbivore species were found in either reference or restored sites, but not in both habitat types. Herbivores (primarily beetles and planthoppers) were more abundant than detritivores (midges and flies) in all habitat types. Predator (web-building and hunting spiders) abundance and species identity were similar among habitat types. Based on stable isotope analysis, trophic relationships differed among mounds, terraces, and reference areas. Herbivore diets were more variable at the reference sites than in either restored habitat type, aligning with higher plant diversity in reference areas. In contrast, detritivore diets were more variable at restored sites, where they were likely consuming food sources such as benthic algae or sediment organic matter. Predator diets were primarily comprised of herbivores in reference areas and detritivores in restored habitats. Overall, the restoration approaches supported abundant terrestrial arthropod assemblages, but species composition was different. In addition, trophic relationships differed between restored and reference areas, in part due to unique plant species assemblages at restored and reference sites. These results suggest that ecosystem restoration strategies that introduce geomorphological heterogeneity and plant diversity are more likely to support a diverse array of species and functions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.965557/fullSpartinaDeepwater Horizon oil spillChenier PlainsSalt Bayou ecosysteminsectspider
spellingShingle Anna R. Armitage
Janelle A. Goeke
Chuan-Kai Ho
Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Spartina
Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Chenier Plains
Salt Bayou ecosystem
insect
spider
title Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
title_full Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
title_fullStr Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
title_full_unstemmed Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
title_short Does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands? A terrestrial arthropod case study on the Upper Texas Coast
title_sort does compensatory mitigation restore food webs in coastal wetlands a terrestrial arthropod case study on the upper texas coast
topic Spartina
Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Chenier Plains
Salt Bayou ecosystem
insect
spider
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.965557/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annararmitage doescompensatorymitigationrestorefoodwebsincoastalwetlandsaterrestrialarthropodcasestudyontheuppertexascoast
AT janelleagoeke doescompensatorymitigationrestorefoodwebsincoastalwetlandsaterrestrialarthropodcasestudyontheuppertexascoast
AT chuankaiho doescompensatorymitigationrestorefoodwebsincoastalwetlandsaterrestrialarthropodcasestudyontheuppertexascoast