Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential

Language is central to human life; however, how our brains derive meaning from language is still not well understood. A commonly studied electrophysiological measure of on-line meaning related processing is the N400 component, the computational basis of which is still actively debated. Here, we test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alma Lindborg, Lea Musiolek, Dirk Ostwald, Milena Rabovsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-03-01
Series:Neuroimage: Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956023000065
_version_ 1827989988565843968
author Alma Lindborg
Lea Musiolek
Dirk Ostwald
Milena Rabovsky
author_facet Alma Lindborg
Lea Musiolek
Dirk Ostwald
Milena Rabovsky
author_sort Alma Lindborg
collection DOAJ
description Language is central to human life; however, how our brains derive meaning from language is still not well understood. A commonly studied electrophysiological measure of on-line meaning related processing is the N400 component, the computational basis of which is still actively debated. Here, we test one of the recently proposed, computationally explicit hypotheses on the N400 – namely, that it reflects surprise with respect to a probabilistic representation of the semantic features of the current stimulus in a given context. We devise a Bayesian sequential learner model to derive trial-by-trial semantic surprise in a semantic oddball like roving paradigm experiment, where single nouns from different semantic categories are presented in sequences. Using experimental data from 40 subjects, we show that model-derived semantic surprise significantly predicts the N400 amplitude, substantially outperforming a non-probabilistic baseline model. Investigating the temporal signature of the effect, we find that the effect of semantic surprise on the EEG is restricted to the time window of the N400. Moreover, comparing the topography of the semantic surprise effect to a conventional ERP analysis of predicted vs. unpredicted words, we find that the semantic surprise closely replicates the N400 topography. Our results make a strong case for the role of probabilistic semantic representations in eliciting the N400, and in language comprehension in general.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T00:30:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9bf0ab2f50e849a2bcabc690c16af74d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-9560
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T00:30:02Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Neuroimage: Reports
spelling doaj.art-9bf0ab2f50e849a2bcabc690c16af74d2023-03-15T04:29:13ZengElsevierNeuroimage: Reports2666-95602023-03-0131100161Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potentialAlma Lindborg0Lea Musiolek1Dirk Ostwald2Milena Rabovsky3Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, GermanyAdaptive Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke Universitaet Magdeburg, Universitaetsplatz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany; Corresponding author.Language is central to human life; however, how our brains derive meaning from language is still not well understood. A commonly studied electrophysiological measure of on-line meaning related processing is the N400 component, the computational basis of which is still actively debated. Here, we test one of the recently proposed, computationally explicit hypotheses on the N400 – namely, that it reflects surprise with respect to a probabilistic representation of the semantic features of the current stimulus in a given context. We devise a Bayesian sequential learner model to derive trial-by-trial semantic surprise in a semantic oddball like roving paradigm experiment, where single nouns from different semantic categories are presented in sequences. Using experimental data from 40 subjects, we show that model-derived semantic surprise significantly predicts the N400 amplitude, substantially outperforming a non-probabilistic baseline model. Investigating the temporal signature of the effect, we find that the effect of semantic surprise on the EEG is restricted to the time window of the N400. Moreover, comparing the topography of the semantic surprise effect to a conventional ERP analysis of predicted vs. unpredicted words, we find that the semantic surprise closely replicates the N400 topography. Our results make a strong case for the role of probabilistic semantic representations in eliciting the N400, and in language comprehension in general.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956023000065LanguageElectrophysiologyBayesian modellingN400Semantics
spellingShingle Alma Lindborg
Lea Musiolek
Dirk Ostwald
Milena Rabovsky
Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
Neuroimage: Reports
Language
Electrophysiology
Bayesian modelling
N400
Semantics
title Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
title_full Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
title_fullStr Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
title_full_unstemmed Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
title_short Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential
title_sort semantic surprise predicts the n400 brain potential
topic Language
Electrophysiology
Bayesian modelling
N400
Semantics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956023000065
work_keys_str_mv AT almalindborg semanticsurprisepredictsthen400brainpotential
AT leamusiolek semanticsurprisepredictsthen400brainpotential
AT dirkostwald semanticsurprisepredictsthen400brainpotential
AT milenarabovsky semanticsurprisepredictsthen400brainpotential