Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review
Since the da Vinci surgical system was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, the development and deployment of various robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (MIS) systems have been largely expedited and boomed. With the rapid advancement of robotic techniques in recent deca...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9768 |
_version_ | 1797582812511993856 |
---|---|
author | Teng Li Armin Badre Farshid Alambeigi Mahdi Tavakoli |
author_facet | Teng Li Armin Badre Farshid Alambeigi Mahdi Tavakoli |
author_sort | Teng Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Since the da Vinci surgical system was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, the development and deployment of various robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (MIS) systems have been largely expedited and boomed. With the rapid advancement of robotic techniques in recent decades, robot-assisted systems have been widely used in various surgeries including orthopedics. These robot-related techniques are transforming the conventional ways to conduct surgical procedures. Robot-assisted orthopedic surgeries have become more and more popular due to their potential benefits of increased accuracy and precision in surgical outcomes, enhanced reproducibility, reduced technical variability, decreased pain, and faster recovery time. In this paper, robotic systems and navigation techniques in typical orthopedic surgeries are reviewed, especially for arthroplasty. From the perspective of robotics and engineering, the systems and techniques are divided into two main categories, i.e., robotic systems (RSs), and computer-aided navigation systems (CANSs). The former is further divided into autonomous RS, hands-on RS, and teleoperated RS. For the latter, three key elements in CANS are introduced, including 3D modeling, registration, and navigation. Lastly, the potential advantages and disadvantages of the RS and CANS are summarized and discussed. Future perspectives on robotics in orthopedics, as well as the challenges, are presented. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T23:27:51Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9bf355a094c942858b01091db51540b6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T23:27:51Z |
publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-9bf355a094c942858b01091db51540b62023-11-19T07:51:37ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-08-011317976810.3390/app13179768Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical ReviewTeng Li0Armin Badre1Farshid Alambeigi2Mahdi Tavakoli3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, CanadaWestern Hand & Upper Limb Facility, Sturgeon Hospital, St. Albert, AB T8N 6C4, CanadaWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Texas Robotics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, CanadaSince the da Vinci surgical system was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, the development and deployment of various robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (MIS) systems have been largely expedited and boomed. With the rapid advancement of robotic techniques in recent decades, robot-assisted systems have been widely used in various surgeries including orthopedics. These robot-related techniques are transforming the conventional ways to conduct surgical procedures. Robot-assisted orthopedic surgeries have become more and more popular due to their potential benefits of increased accuracy and precision in surgical outcomes, enhanced reproducibility, reduced technical variability, decreased pain, and faster recovery time. In this paper, robotic systems and navigation techniques in typical orthopedic surgeries are reviewed, especially for arthroplasty. From the perspective of robotics and engineering, the systems and techniques are divided into two main categories, i.e., robotic systems (RSs), and computer-aided navigation systems (CANSs). The former is further divided into autonomous RS, hands-on RS, and teleoperated RS. For the latter, three key elements in CANS are introduced, including 3D modeling, registration, and navigation. Lastly, the potential advantages and disadvantages of the RS and CANS are summarized and discussed. Future perspectives on robotics in orthopedics, as well as the challenges, are presented.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9768robot-assisted surgeryorthopedic surgerycomputer-assisted orthopedic surgerycomputer-aided navigation systemarthroscopic surgery |
spellingShingle | Teng Li Armin Badre Farshid Alambeigi Mahdi Tavakoli Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review Applied Sciences robot-assisted surgery orthopedic surgery computer-assisted orthopedic surgery computer-aided navigation system arthroscopic surgery |
title | Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review |
title_full | Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review |
title_fullStr | Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review |
title_short | Robotic Systems and Navigation Techniques in Orthopedics: A Historical Review |
title_sort | robotic systems and navigation techniques in orthopedics a historical review |
topic | robot-assisted surgery orthopedic surgery computer-assisted orthopedic surgery computer-aided navigation system arthroscopic surgery |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/17/9768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tengli roboticsystemsandnavigationtechniquesinorthopedicsahistoricalreview AT arminbadre roboticsystemsandnavigationtechniquesinorthopedicsahistoricalreview AT farshidalambeigi roboticsystemsandnavigationtechniquesinorthopedicsahistoricalreview AT mahditavakoli roboticsystemsandnavigationtechniquesinorthopedicsahistoricalreview |