Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge

In the last few years, neuroscience research has started having an impact on education, by expanding the theories of learning with interesting implications also from an operational and practical point of view. Already in 2017, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) sugges...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiara Fante, Rosalba Morese, Dario La Guardia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2023-02-01
Series:Italian Journal of Educational Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijet.itd.cnr.it/article/view/1306
_version_ 1797704870330892288
author Chiara Fante
Rosalba Morese
Dario La Guardia
author_facet Chiara Fante
Rosalba Morese
Dario La Guardia
author_sort Chiara Fante
collection DOAJ
description In the last few years, neuroscience research has started having an impact on education, by expanding the theories of learning with interesting implications also from an operational and practical point of view. Already in 2017, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) suggested technology and neuroscience are two key areas of development for education, as the consideration of the learners’ brain-body functioning can support the development of better teaching methodologies and technology-enhanced learning practices; however, the integration of neuroscientific research findings into educational theory and practice, avoiding direct and simplistic applications, is still an open issue. In recent decades, a debate in the research community on this subject has been fostered by the contribution of John Bruer, where he stated that “neuroscience has little to offer teachers in terms of information about classroom practice” (1997, p. 4) and that cognitive psychology is the only viable bridge to link knowledge about brain functioning and educational theory. His point of view represents a critical response to the rapid proliferation during that time of misconceptions created by misreading or simplifying scientifically established data to justify the use of brain research in educational practice. Subsequently, several scientists have focused on clarifying how knowledge of brain structure and functioning can have a positive impact on the school system and educational field, arguing that Educational Neuroscience is not only a way to improve teaching but should aim to explain how students learn and how learning processes change our brain (Howard-Jones et al., 2016), and that different bridges need to be built to characterize this field of research “with multiple methodologies and levels of analysis in multiple contexts” (Ansari & Coch, 2006, p. 146). However, within this debate, it is also argued that the gap between neuroscience and education cannot be solved by supporting the interaction between neuroscientists and teachers or by building a “bridge” between different fields, but rather by the development of evidence-based education (Della Sala & Anderson, 2012); moreover, evidence that the brain changes in response to teaching may have no relevance to teachers, since the only relevant question is whether students learn and how learning is reflected in their behaviors (Bowers, 2016). To date, these different theoretical viewpoints promote ongoing critical discussion among educational researchers and stakeholders.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:27:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c1c212c425d4192853817a08caaa4e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2532-4632
2532-7720
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:27:53Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Italian Journal of Educational Technology
spelling doaj.art-9c1c212c425d4192853817a08caaa4e02023-09-03T07:14:50ZengFirenze University PressItalian Journal of Educational Technology2532-46322532-77202023-02-0110.17471/2499-4324/1306Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challengeChiara Fante0Rosalba Morese1Dario La Guardia2Institute for Educational Technology, National Research Council, Genoa, ItalyUniversity of Italian Switzerland (USI), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, SwitzerlandInstitute for Educational Technology, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy In the last few years, neuroscience research has started having an impact on education, by expanding the theories of learning with interesting implications also from an operational and practical point of view. Already in 2017, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) suggested technology and neuroscience are two key areas of development for education, as the consideration of the learners’ brain-body functioning can support the development of better teaching methodologies and technology-enhanced learning practices; however, the integration of neuroscientific research findings into educational theory and practice, avoiding direct and simplistic applications, is still an open issue. In recent decades, a debate in the research community on this subject has been fostered by the contribution of John Bruer, where he stated that “neuroscience has little to offer teachers in terms of information about classroom practice” (1997, p. 4) and that cognitive psychology is the only viable bridge to link knowledge about brain functioning and educational theory. His point of view represents a critical response to the rapid proliferation during that time of misconceptions created by misreading or simplifying scientifically established data to justify the use of brain research in educational practice. Subsequently, several scientists have focused on clarifying how knowledge of brain structure and functioning can have a positive impact on the school system and educational field, arguing that Educational Neuroscience is not only a way to improve teaching but should aim to explain how students learn and how learning processes change our brain (Howard-Jones et al., 2016), and that different bridges need to be built to characterize this field of research “with multiple methodologies and levels of analysis in multiple contexts” (Ansari & Coch, 2006, p. 146). However, within this debate, it is also argued that the gap between neuroscience and education cannot be solved by supporting the interaction between neuroscientists and teachers or by building a “bridge” between different fields, but rather by the development of evidence-based education (Della Sala & Anderson, 2012); moreover, evidence that the brain changes in response to teaching may have no relevance to teachers, since the only relevant question is whether students learn and how learning is reflected in their behaviors (Bowers, 2016). To date, these different theoretical viewpoints promote ongoing critical discussion among educational researchers and stakeholders. https://ijet.itd.cnr.it/article/view/1306EditorialEducational TechnologyTechnology Enhanced Learning (TEL)NeuroscienceEducational Neuroscience
spellingShingle Chiara Fante
Rosalba Morese
Dario La Guardia
Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
Italian Journal of Educational Technology
Editorial
Educational Technology
Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL)
Neuroscience
Educational Neuroscience
title Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
title_full Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
title_fullStr Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
title_full_unstemmed Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
title_short Editorial. Educational neuroscience: An opened challenge
title_sort editorial educational neuroscience an opened challenge
topic Editorial
Educational Technology
Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL)
Neuroscience
Educational Neuroscience
url https://ijet.itd.cnr.it/article/view/1306
work_keys_str_mv AT chiarafante editorialeducationalneuroscienceanopenedchallenge
AT rosalbamorese editorialeducationalneuroscienceanopenedchallenge
AT dariolaguardia editorialeducationalneuroscienceanopenedchallenge