Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method
Background: In MR-based radiotherapy (RT), MRI images are co-registered to the planning CT to leverage MR image information for RT planning. Especially in brain stereotactic RT, where typical CTV-PTV margins are 1-2 mm, high registration accuracy is critical. Several factors influence the registrati...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000599 |
_version_ | 1797385297079566336 |
---|---|
author | Siti Masitho Florian Putz Veit Mengling Lisa Reißig Raphaela Voigt Tobias Bäuerle Rolf Janka Rainer Fietkau Christoph Bert |
author_facet | Siti Masitho Florian Putz Veit Mengling Lisa Reißig Raphaela Voigt Tobias Bäuerle Rolf Janka Rainer Fietkau Christoph Bert |
author_sort | Siti Masitho |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: In MR-based radiotherapy (RT), MRI images are co-registered to the planning CT to leverage MR image information for RT planning. Especially in brain stereotactic RT, where typical CTV-PTV margins are 1-2 mm, high registration accuracy is critical. Several factors influence the registration accuracy, including the acquisition setup during MR simulation and the registration methods. Purpose: In this work, the impact of the MRI acquisition setup and registration method was evaluated in the context of brain RT, both geometrically and dosimetrically. Methods and Materials: MRI of 20 brain radiotherapy patients was acquired in two MRI acquisition setups (RT and diagnostic). Three different automatic registration tools provided by three treatment planning systems were used to rigidly register both MRIs and CT in addition to the clinical registration. Segmentation-based evaluation using Hausdorff Distance (HD)/Dice Similarity Coefficient and landmark-based evaluation were used as evaluation metrics. Dose-volume-histograms were evaluated for target volumes and various organs at risks. Results: MRI acquisition in the RT setup provided a similar head extension as compared to the planning CT. The registration method had a more significant influence than the acquisition setup (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p<0.05). When registering using a less optimal registration method, the RT setup improved the registration accuracy compared to the diagnostic setup (Difference: ΔMHD = 0.16 mm, ΔHDP95 = 0.64 mm, mean Euclidean distance (ΔmEuD) = 2.65 mm). Different registration methods and acquisition setups lead to the variation of the clinical DVH. Acquiring MRI in the RT setup can improve PTV and GTV coverage compared to the diagnostic setup. Conclusions: Both MRI acquisition setup and registration method influence the MRI-CT registration accuracy in brain RT patients geometrically and dosimetrically. MR-simulation in the RT setup assures optimal registration accuracy if automatic registration is impaired, and therefore recommended for brain RT. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:52:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9c2320e5ac0a4889b6b532167f1970e5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0939-3889 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:52:05Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik |
spelling | doaj.art-9c2320e5ac0a4889b6b532167f1970e52023-12-20T07:33:19ZengElsevierZeitschrift für Medizinische Physik0939-38892022-11-01324477487Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration methodSiti Masitho0Florian Putz1Veit Mengling2Lisa Reißig3Raphaela Voigt4Tobias Bäuerle5Rolf Janka6Rainer Fietkau7Christoph Bert8Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany; Corresponding author: Siti Masitho, Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiology. Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiology. Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, GermanyBackground: In MR-based radiotherapy (RT), MRI images are co-registered to the planning CT to leverage MR image information for RT planning. Especially in brain stereotactic RT, where typical CTV-PTV margins are 1-2 mm, high registration accuracy is critical. Several factors influence the registration accuracy, including the acquisition setup during MR simulation and the registration methods. Purpose: In this work, the impact of the MRI acquisition setup and registration method was evaluated in the context of brain RT, both geometrically and dosimetrically. Methods and Materials: MRI of 20 brain radiotherapy patients was acquired in two MRI acquisition setups (RT and diagnostic). Three different automatic registration tools provided by three treatment planning systems were used to rigidly register both MRIs and CT in addition to the clinical registration. Segmentation-based evaluation using Hausdorff Distance (HD)/Dice Similarity Coefficient and landmark-based evaluation were used as evaluation metrics. Dose-volume-histograms were evaluated for target volumes and various organs at risks. Results: MRI acquisition in the RT setup provided a similar head extension as compared to the planning CT. The registration method had a more significant influence than the acquisition setup (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p<0.05). When registering using a less optimal registration method, the RT setup improved the registration accuracy compared to the diagnostic setup (Difference: ΔMHD = 0.16 mm, ΔHDP95 = 0.64 mm, mean Euclidean distance (ΔmEuD) = 2.65 mm). Different registration methods and acquisition setups lead to the variation of the clinical DVH. Acquiring MRI in the RT setup can improve PTV and GTV coverage compared to the diagnostic setup. Conclusions: Both MRI acquisition setup and registration method influence the MRI-CT registration accuracy in brain RT patients geometrically and dosimetrically. MR-simulation in the RT setup assures optimal registration accuracy if automatic registration is impaired, and therefore recommended for brain RT.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000599Magnetic-resonance imagingRegistrationBrain radiotherapyIntracranial stereotactic radiotherapyPatient immobilization |
spellingShingle | Siti Masitho Florian Putz Veit Mengling Lisa Reißig Raphaela Voigt Tobias Bäuerle Rolf Janka Rainer Fietkau Christoph Bert Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik Magnetic-resonance imaging Registration Brain radiotherapy Intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy Patient immobilization |
title | Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method |
title_full | Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method |
title_short | Accuracy of MRI-CT registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy: Impact of MRI acquisition setup and registration method |
title_sort | accuracy of mri ct registration in brain stereotactic radiotherapy impact of mri acquisition setup and registration method |
topic | Magnetic-resonance imaging Registration Brain radiotherapy Intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy Patient immobilization |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sitimasitho accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT florianputz accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT veitmengling accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT lisareißig accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT raphaelavoigt accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT tobiasbauerle accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT rolfjanka accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT rainerfietkau accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod AT christophbert accuracyofmrictregistrationinbrainstereotacticradiotherapyimpactofmriacquisitionsetupandregistrationmethod |