Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan

“Informal heritage” refers to spaces in cities that have certain heritage value but cannot be officially recognized as urban or architectural heritage sites. The author has observed the recognition and conservation of informal building heritage driven by architectural scholars (professionals) or com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fei Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-07-01
Series:Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1941988
_version_ 1817982674168446976
author Fei Chen
author_facet Fei Chen
author_sort Fei Chen
collection DOAJ
description “Informal heritage” refers to spaces in cities that have certain heritage value but cannot be officially recognized as urban or architectural heritage sites. The author has observed the recognition and conservation of informal building heritage driven by architectural scholars (professionals) or communities in some Asian cities; this phenomenon provides a suitable perspective from which to observe the connection between Asian conservation, citizen participation, and urbanism. Western heritage research recently emphasizes the empowerment of communities to manage heritage conservation; however, what is the meaningful community participation in the old building’s conservation if adding the professional perspective, especially in the diversified Asian urban context, remains unclear. This study involved participatory observation, interviews, and the analysis of relevant literature for comparison of the recognition and conservation approaches of two typical “informal heritage” cases in Hong Kong (China) and Iwate Prefecture (Japan). This paper discusses the interaction modes among historians, related professionals, and communities and the “heritage process” in these two urban contexts. Additionally, an argument is made that these two cases are consistent with a Western heritage conservation theory, which encourages community empowerment; however, in the Asian urban context, a higher degree of community participation does not necessarily indicate more meaningful participation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:23:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c2365008fc64c89a92ba2045cd562d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1347-2852
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:23:36Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
spelling doaj.art-9c2365008fc64c89a92ba2045cd562d82022-12-22T02:25:08ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering1347-28522022-07-012141364138010.1080/13467581.2021.19419881941988Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, JapanFei Chen0The Chinese University of Hong Kong“Informal heritage” refers to spaces in cities that have certain heritage value but cannot be officially recognized as urban or architectural heritage sites. The author has observed the recognition and conservation of informal building heritage driven by architectural scholars (professionals) or communities in some Asian cities; this phenomenon provides a suitable perspective from which to observe the connection between Asian conservation, citizen participation, and urbanism. Western heritage research recently emphasizes the empowerment of communities to manage heritage conservation; however, what is the meaningful community participation in the old building’s conservation if adding the professional perspective, especially in the diversified Asian urban context, remains unclear. This study involved participatory observation, interviews, and the analysis of relevant literature for comparison of the recognition and conservation approaches of two typical “informal heritage” cases in Hong Kong (China) and Iwate Prefecture (Japan). This paper discusses the interaction modes among historians, related professionals, and communities and the “heritage process” in these two urban contexts. Additionally, an argument is made that these two cases are consistent with a Western heritage conservation theory, which encourages community empowerment; however, in the Asian urban context, a higher degree of community participation does not necessarily indicate more meaningful participation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1941988informal heritageunofficial recognition and conservationcommunity participationwestern authorized heritage discourse
spellingShingle Fei Chen
Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
informal heritage
unofficial recognition and conservation
community participation
western authorized heritage discourse
title Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
title_full Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
title_fullStr Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
title_short Comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage: cases from Hong Kong, China and Iwate Prefecture, Japan
title_sort comparison of unofficial recognition and conservation approaches to informal architectural heritage cases from hong kong china and iwate prefecture japan
topic informal heritage
unofficial recognition and conservation
community participation
western authorized heritage discourse
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2021.1941988
work_keys_str_mv AT feichen comparisonofunofficialrecognitionandconservationapproachestoinformalarchitecturalheritagecasesfromhongkongchinaandiwateprefecturejapan