Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes

A collection of 24 hexacoordinate Co(II) complexes was investigated by ab initio CASSCF + NEVPT2 + SOC calculations. In addition to the energies of spin–orbit multiplets (Kramers doublets, KD) their composition of the spins is also analyzed, along with the projection norm to the effective Hamiltonia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roman Boča, Cyril Rajnák, Ján Titiš
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Magnetochemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2312-7481/9/4/100
_version_ 1797604616547860480
author Roman Boča
Cyril Rajnák
Ján Titiš
author_facet Roman Boča
Cyril Rajnák
Ján Titiš
author_sort Roman Boča
collection DOAJ
description A collection of 24 hexacoordinate Co(II) complexes was investigated by ab initio CASSCF + NEVPT2 + SOC calculations. In addition to the energies of spin–orbit multiplets (Kramers doublets, KD) their composition of the spins is also analyzed, along with the projection norm to the effective Hamiltonian. The latter served as the evaluation of the axial and rhombic zero-field splitting parameters and the g-tensor components. The fulfilment of spin-Hamiltonian (SH) formalism was assessed by critical indicators: the projection norm for the first Kramers doublet <i>N</i>(KD1) > 0.7, the lowest <i>g</i>-tensor component <i>g</i><sub>1</sub> > 1.9, the composition of KDs from the spin states |±1/2> and |±3/2> with the dominating percentage <i>p</i> > 70%, and the first transition energy at the NEVPT2 level <sup>4</sup>Δ<sub>1</sub>. Just the latter quantity causes a possible divergence of the second-order perturbation theory and a failure of the spin Hamiltonian. The data set was enriched by the structural axiality <i>D</i><sub>str</sub> and rhombicity <i>E</i><sub>str</sub>, respectively, evaluated from the metal–ligand distances Co-O, Co-N and Co-Cl corrected to the mean values. The magnetic data (temperature dependence of the molar magnetic susceptibility, and the field dependence of the magnetization per formula unit) were fitted simultaneously, either to the Griffith–Figgis model working with 12 spin–orbit kets, or the SH-zero field splitting model that utilizes only four (fictitious) spin functions. The calculated data were analyzed using statistical methods such as Cluster Analysis and the Principal Component Analysis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:49:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c2dda0214364fd18a22b44f88310085
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-7481
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:49:16Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Magnetochemistry
spelling doaj.art-9c2dda0214364fd18a22b44f883100852023-11-17T20:09:42ZengMDPI AGMagnetochemistry2312-74812023-04-019410010.3390/magnetochemistry9040100Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) ComplexesRoman Boča0Cyril Rajnák1Ján Titiš2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of SS Cyril and Methodius, 91701 Trnava, SlovakiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of SS Cyril and Methodius, 91701 Trnava, SlovakiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of SS Cyril and Methodius, 91701 Trnava, SlovakiaA collection of 24 hexacoordinate Co(II) complexes was investigated by ab initio CASSCF + NEVPT2 + SOC calculations. In addition to the energies of spin–orbit multiplets (Kramers doublets, KD) their composition of the spins is also analyzed, along with the projection norm to the effective Hamiltonian. The latter served as the evaluation of the axial and rhombic zero-field splitting parameters and the g-tensor components. The fulfilment of spin-Hamiltonian (SH) formalism was assessed by critical indicators: the projection norm for the first Kramers doublet <i>N</i>(KD1) > 0.7, the lowest <i>g</i>-tensor component <i>g</i><sub>1</sub> > 1.9, the composition of KDs from the spin states |±1/2> and |±3/2> with the dominating percentage <i>p</i> > 70%, and the first transition energy at the NEVPT2 level <sup>4</sup>Δ<sub>1</sub>. Just the latter quantity causes a possible divergence of the second-order perturbation theory and a failure of the spin Hamiltonian. The data set was enriched by the structural axiality <i>D</i><sub>str</sub> and rhombicity <i>E</i><sub>str</sub>, respectively, evaluated from the metal–ligand distances Co-O, Co-N and Co-Cl corrected to the mean values. The magnetic data (temperature dependence of the molar magnetic susceptibility, and the field dependence of the magnetization per formula unit) were fitted simultaneously, either to the Griffith–Figgis model working with 12 spin–orbit kets, or the SH-zero field splitting model that utilizes only four (fictitious) spin functions. The calculated data were analyzed using statistical methods such as Cluster Analysis and the Principal Component Analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/2312-7481/9/4/100cobalt(II) complexeszero-field splittingab initio calculationsspin HamiltonianGriffith–Figgis model
spellingShingle Roman Boča
Cyril Rajnák
Ján Titiš
Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
Magnetochemistry
cobalt(II) complexes
zero-field splitting
ab initio calculations
spin Hamiltonian
Griffith–Figgis model
title Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
title_full Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
title_fullStr Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
title_short Zero-Field Splitting in Hexacoordinate Co(II) Complexes
title_sort zero field splitting in hexacoordinate co ii complexes
topic cobalt(II) complexes
zero-field splitting
ab initio calculations
spin Hamiltonian
Griffith–Figgis model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2312-7481/9/4/100
work_keys_str_mv AT romanboca zerofieldsplittinginhexacoordinatecoiicomplexes
AT cyrilrajnak zerofieldsplittinginhexacoordinatecoiicomplexes
AT jantitis zerofieldsplittinginhexacoordinatecoiicomplexes