Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation

Previous research has established a reliable link between religiosity and schizotypy as well as schizophrenia. However, past research mainly measured religiosity as a one-dimensional construct. In the present research (N = 189), we aimed to get a better understanding of the religiosity−sch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul H. P. Hanel, Sarah Demmrich, Uwe Wolfradt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/5/297
_version_ 1818287611600437248
author Paul H. P. Hanel
Sarah Demmrich
Uwe Wolfradt
author_facet Paul H. P. Hanel
Sarah Demmrich
Uwe Wolfradt
author_sort Paul H. P. Hanel
collection DOAJ
description Previous research has established a reliable link between religiosity and schizotypy as well as schizophrenia. However, past research mainly measured religiosity as a one-dimensional construct. In the present research (N = 189), we aimed to get a better understanding of the religiosity−schizotypy link by measuring religiosity using Huber’s five-dimensional model of Centrality of Religiosity, while also testing for curvilinear relations and potential moderators. We found negative small-to-medium-sized correlations between all five dimensions of religiosity and the schizotypy dimension of impulsive nonconformity, but no reliable associations with the other three dimensions of schizotypy: unusual experiences, cognitive disorganization, and introverted anhedonia. Some of these associations were moderated by religious affiliation: Religiosity and schizotypy correlated positively among non-members, but negatively among members of religious communities, suggesting that affiliation has a positive impact on the well-being of religious people. In line with Huber’s predictions, we found a reversed U-shape association between the religious dimension of private religious practice and schizotypy. Unexpectedly, however, conformity and tradition values did not moderate the relations between religiosity and schizotypy. We discuss our findings in terms of person−environment fit, the prevention hypothesis of the schizotypy-religiosity link, and offer implications for mental health practitioners.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:43:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c34589b664945ce9075da8d6f5a30f5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:43:15Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-9c34589b664945ce9075da8d6f5a30f52022-12-22T00:03:42ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-04-0110529710.3390/rel10050297rel10050297Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious AffiliationPaul H. P. Hanel0Sarah Demmrich1Uwe Wolfradt2Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UKCluster of Excellence Religion and Politics/Sociology of Religion, University of Munster, 48143 Munster, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 6099 Halle, GermanyPrevious research has established a reliable link between religiosity and schizotypy as well as schizophrenia. However, past research mainly measured religiosity as a one-dimensional construct. In the present research (N = 189), we aimed to get a better understanding of the religiosity−schizotypy link by measuring religiosity using Huber’s five-dimensional model of Centrality of Religiosity, while also testing for curvilinear relations and potential moderators. We found negative small-to-medium-sized correlations between all five dimensions of religiosity and the schizotypy dimension of impulsive nonconformity, but no reliable associations with the other three dimensions of schizotypy: unusual experiences, cognitive disorganization, and introverted anhedonia. Some of these associations were moderated by religious affiliation: Religiosity and schizotypy correlated positively among non-members, but negatively among members of religious communities, suggesting that affiliation has a positive impact on the well-being of religious people. In line with Huber’s predictions, we found a reversed U-shape association between the religious dimension of private religious practice and schizotypy. Unexpectedly, however, conformity and tradition values did not moderate the relations between religiosity and schizotypy. We discuss our findings in terms of person−environment fit, the prevention hypothesis of the schizotypy-religiosity link, and offer implications for mental health practitioners.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/5/297religiosityschizotypyhuman valuesreligious affiliation
spellingShingle Paul H. P. Hanel
Sarah Demmrich
Uwe Wolfradt
Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
Religions
religiosity
schizotypy
human values
religious affiliation
title Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
title_full Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
title_fullStr Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
title_full_unstemmed Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
title_short Centrality of Religiosity, Schizotypy, and Human Values: The Impact of Religious Affiliation
title_sort centrality of religiosity schizotypy and human values the impact of religious affiliation
topic religiosity
schizotypy
human values
religious affiliation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/5/297
work_keys_str_mv AT paulhphanel centralityofreligiosityschizotypyandhumanvaluestheimpactofreligiousaffiliation
AT sarahdemmrich centralityofreligiosityschizotypyandhumanvaluestheimpactofreligiousaffiliation
AT uwewolfradt centralityofreligiosityschizotypyandhumanvaluestheimpactofreligiousaffiliation