Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article fo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2022-02-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930 |
_version_ | 1797900857072680960 |
---|---|
author | Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum Mohammad Mahrus Ali |
author_facet | Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum Mohammad Mahrus Ali |
author_sort | Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article focuses on the role and track record of Bawaslu as the supervisor of the Regional Head Elections in the vortex of controversy. Disputes over the results of the regional head elections in the Constitutional Court. In PHPKada, these include North Morowali Regency, Boven Digoel Regency, Sekadau Regency, Pesisir Selatan Regency, and Sabu Raijua Regency where Bawaslu always presents information on the results of supervision in every trial at the Constitutional Court. The facts of the trial that were revealed cannot be separated from the judicial strengthening of Bawaslu's role and the Panel of Judges can elaborate deeper into the results of field supervision. The process of proof in the trial of the Constitutional Court by examining the evidence, witness statements are also equipped with the submission of the results of the report by the party giving the information, namely Bawaslu. The addition of this authority makes Bawaslu no longer just a recommending institution, but also decide the election case.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9c36f78e14aa4a63a4591b799cdeda66 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:35Z |
publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
record_format | Article |
series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
spelling | doaj.art-9c36f78e14aa4a63a4591b799cdeda662023-02-22T04:09:42ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572022-02-0118410.31078/jk1849565Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah KonstitusiRima Yuwana Yustikaningrum0Mohammad Mahrus Ali1Pusat Penelitian Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik IndonesiaPusat Penelitian Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article focuses on the role and track record of Bawaslu as the supervisor of the Regional Head Elections in the vortex of controversy. Disputes over the results of the regional head elections in the Constitutional Court. In PHPKada, these include North Morowali Regency, Boven Digoel Regency, Sekadau Regency, Pesisir Selatan Regency, and Sabu Raijua Regency where Bawaslu always presents information on the results of supervision in every trial at the Constitutional Court. The facts of the trial that were revealed cannot be separated from the judicial strengthening of Bawaslu's role and the Panel of Judges can elaborate deeper into the results of field supervision. The process of proof in the trial of the Constitutional Court by examining the evidence, witness statements are also equipped with the submission of the results of the report by the party giving the information, namely Bawaslu. The addition of this authority makes Bawaslu no longer just a recommending institution, but also decide the election case. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930Badan Pengawas PemiluPerselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala DaerahMahkamah Konstitusi |
spellingShingle | Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum Mohammad Mahrus Ali Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi Badan Pengawas Pemilu Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title | Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title_full | Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title_fullStr | Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title_full_unstemmed | Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title_short | Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
title_sort | dari sekadau ke sabu raijua menakar jejak bawaslu dalam dinamika persidangan di mahkamah konstitusi |
topic | Badan Pengawas Pemilu Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Mahkamah Konstitusi |
url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rimayuwanayustikaningrum darisekadaukesaburaijuamenakarjejakbawasludalamdinamikapersidangandimahkamahkonstitusi AT mohammadmahrusali darisekadaukesaburaijuamenakarjejakbawasludalamdinamikapersidangandimahkamahkonstitusi |