Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi

The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum, Mohammad Mahrus Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2022-02-01
Series:Jurnal Konstitusi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930
_version_ 1797900857072680960
author Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum
Mohammad Mahrus Ali
author_facet Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum
Mohammad Mahrus Ali
author_sort Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum
collection DOAJ
description The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article focuses on the role and track record of Bawaslu as the supervisor of the Regional Head Elections in the vortex of controversy. Disputes over the results of the regional head elections in the Constitutional Court. In PHPKada, these include North Morowali Regency, Boven Digoel Regency, Sekadau Regency, Pesisir Selatan Regency, and Sabu Raijua Regency where Bawaslu always presents information on the results of supervision in every trial at the Constitutional Court. The facts of the trial that were revealed cannot be separated from the judicial strengthening of Bawaslu's role and the Panel of Judges can elaborate deeper into the results of field supervision. The process of proof in the trial of the Constitutional Court by examining the evidence, witness statements are also equipped with the submission of the results of the report by the party giving the information, namely Bawaslu. The addition of this authority makes Bawaslu no longer just a recommending institution, but also decide the election case.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c36f78e14aa4a63a4591b799cdeda66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1829-7706
2548-1657
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:52:35Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Konstitusi
spelling doaj.art-9c36f78e14aa4a63a4591b799cdeda662023-02-22T04:09:42ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572022-02-0118410.31078/jk1849565Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah KonstitusiRima Yuwana Yustikaningrum0Mohammad Mahrus Ali1Pusat Penelitian Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik IndonesiaPusat Penelitian Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in the hearing of 2020 Regional Head Election Dispute played an essential role as a supervisor and its statements in the field became one of the keys for the Constitutional Court of Justice to obtain balanced, neutral or impartial information. This article focuses on the role and track record of Bawaslu as the supervisor of the Regional Head Elections in the vortex of controversy. Disputes over the results of the regional head elections in the Constitutional Court. In PHPKada, these include North Morowali Regency, Boven Digoel Regency, Sekadau Regency, Pesisir Selatan Regency, and Sabu Raijua Regency where Bawaslu always presents information on the results of supervision in every trial at the Constitutional Court. The facts of the trial that were revealed cannot be separated from the judicial strengthening of Bawaslu's role and the Panel of Judges can elaborate deeper into the results of field supervision. The process of proof in the trial of the Constitutional Court by examining the evidence, witness statements are also equipped with the submission of the results of the report by the party giving the information, namely Bawaslu. The addition of this authority makes Bawaslu no longer just a recommending institution, but also decide the election case. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930Badan Pengawas PemiluPerselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala DaerahMahkamah Konstitusi
spellingShingle Rima Yuwana Yustikaningrum
Mohammad Mahrus Ali
Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
Jurnal Konstitusi
Badan Pengawas Pemilu
Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Mahkamah Konstitusi
title Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
title_full Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
title_fullStr Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
title_full_unstemmed Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
title_short Dari Sekadau ke Sabu Raijua: Menakar Jejak Bawaslu dalam Dinamika Persidangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi
title_sort dari sekadau ke sabu raijua menakar jejak bawaslu dalam dinamika persidangan di mahkamah konstitusi
topic Badan Pengawas Pemilu
Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Mahkamah Konstitusi
url https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1930
work_keys_str_mv AT rimayuwanayustikaningrum darisekadaukesaburaijuamenakarjejakbawasludalamdinamikapersidangandimahkamahkonstitusi
AT mohammadmahrusali darisekadaukesaburaijuamenakarjejakbawasludalamdinamikapersidangandimahkamahkonstitusi