Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments

Hydraulic conductivity determination plays an essential role in the investigation of groundwater flow regime which can then influence many field problems such as pumping capabilities in the area, transport of contaminant or heat and soil internal erosion. Numerous equations based on dimensional anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario Hala, Lubomír Petrula, Zakaraya Alhasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mendel University Press 2020-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.mendelu.cz/68/4/0669/
_version_ 1829137512727052288
author Mario Hala
Lubomír Petrula
Zakaraya Alhasan
author_facet Mario Hala
Lubomír Petrula
Zakaraya Alhasan
author_sort Mario Hala
collection DOAJ
description Hydraulic conductivity determination plays an essential role in the investigation of groundwater flow regime which can then influence many field problems such as pumping capabilities in the area, transport of contaminant or heat and soil internal erosion. Numerous equations based on dimensional analysis or experimental measurements have been published since the end of the 19th century for the determination of hydraulic conductivity. However, not all of these formulae are applicable for every material and all of them bring some uncertainty in the value of hydraulic conductivity. This paper contains a description of experimental research carried out concerning the determination of hydraulic conductivity for four types of sand with different grain size distribution curves and variable porosity. Obtained values of hydraulic conductivity ranged from 1·1004 to 4·1003 according to the sample porosity. The series of experiments consisted of 160 separate tests conducted in order to obtain relevant statistical sets. In this paper, the experimental data are discussed and compared with hydraulic conductivities obtained from 6 empirical formulae recommended in a previous study. The comparison showed that some empirical formulae provide a good agreement with the experimental data (the most precise were formulae published by Terzaghi and by Sauerbrey). However, some formulae showed high deviation from measured data (formula published by Zamarin).
first_indexed 2024-12-14T18:59:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c39d6cf3c2846e1bea726a5dd05894a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1211-8516
2464-8310
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T18:59:20Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Mendel University Press
record_format Article
series Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
spelling doaj.art-9c39d6cf3c2846e1bea726a5dd05894a2022-12-21T22:50:59ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102020-01-0168466967810.11118/actaun202068040669Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory ExperimentsMario Hala0Lubomír Petrula1Zakaraya Alhasan2Institute of Water Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90 Brno, Czech RepublicInstitute of Water Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90 Brno, Czech RepublicInstitute of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90 Brno, Czech RepublicHydraulic conductivity determination plays an essential role in the investigation of groundwater flow regime which can then influence many field problems such as pumping capabilities in the area, transport of contaminant or heat and soil internal erosion. Numerous equations based on dimensional analysis or experimental measurements have been published since the end of the 19th century for the determination of hydraulic conductivity. However, not all of these formulae are applicable for every material and all of them bring some uncertainty in the value of hydraulic conductivity. This paper contains a description of experimental research carried out concerning the determination of hydraulic conductivity for four types of sand with different grain size distribution curves and variable porosity. Obtained values of hydraulic conductivity ranged from 1·1004 to 4·1003 according to the sample porosity. The series of experiments consisted of 160 separate tests conducted in order to obtain relevant statistical sets. In this paper, the experimental data are discussed and compared with hydraulic conductivities obtained from 6 empirical formulae recommended in a previous study. The comparison showed that some empirical formulae provide a good agreement with the experimental data (the most precise were formulae published by Terzaghi and by Sauerbrey). However, some formulae showed high deviation from measured data (formula published by Zamarin).https://acta.mendelu.cz/68/4/0669/empirical formulaehydraulic conductivityporosity
spellingShingle Mario Hala
Lubomír Petrula
Zakaraya Alhasan
Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
empirical formulae
hydraulic conductivity
porosity
title Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
title_full Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
title_fullStr Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
title_short Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
title_sort comparison of hydraulic conductivity values obtained from empirical formulae and laboratory experiments
topic empirical formulae
hydraulic conductivity
porosity
url https://acta.mendelu.cz/68/4/0669/
work_keys_str_mv AT mariohala comparisonofhydraulicconductivityvaluesobtainedfromempiricalformulaeandlaboratoryexperiments
AT lubomirpetrula comparisonofhydraulicconductivityvaluesobtainedfromempiricalformulaeandlaboratoryexperiments
AT zakarayaalhasan comparisonofhydraulicconductivityvaluesobtainedfromempiricalformulaeandlaboratoryexperiments