Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: Within the broad spectrum of rehabilitation, maxillofacial prostheses are those that are made to restore the appearance of a person who has suffered facial deformation due to cancer, accidents, congenital diseases, among others. Although these are not made to restore functionality, they...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/11-505/v2 |
| _version_ | 1797350955734269952 |
|---|---|
| author | Luciano Lauria Dib Rodrigo Salazar-Gamarra Salvatore Binasco Lengua Diego Eyzaguirre |
| author_facet | Luciano Lauria Dib Rodrigo Salazar-Gamarra Salvatore Binasco Lengua Diego Eyzaguirre |
| author_sort | Luciano Lauria Dib |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Within the broad spectrum of rehabilitation, maxillofacial prostheses are those that are made to restore the appearance of a person who has suffered facial deformation due to cancer, accidents, congenital diseases, among others. Although these are not made to restore functionality, they have a major impact on restoring the patient's quality of life as it is an area so closely linked to their identity. For his reason, they have to be carefully tailored for each patient, which tends to increase cost and production time Objectives: The purpose of this research is to compare different additive manufacturing mechanisms, to evaluate which of them achieves the best reproduction of the leather details and maintains the desired dimensional properties. Methods: The manufacturing equipment will be selected comparing 7 different 3D printing of an oculo-palpebral model for a future maxillofacial prosthesis, obtained from the “Mais Identidade” Method. They were evaluated according to their economic, physical and aesthetic characteristics. Results: The results of the evaluations show that: the highest score in the economic evaluation was obtained by PhotonS; in the physical evaluation it was obtained by PhotonS, Phrozen Suffle XL and PRO95; and in the aesthetic evaluation it was obtained by PRO95 and Objet500. Finally, according to the multi-criteria evaluation, the highest score was obtained by the Photon S and PRO95. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:53:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9c3b97d3fccf44f8bbb8227702618e4c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-1402 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T12:53:33Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | F1000Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-9c3b97d3fccf44f8bbb8227702618e4c2024-01-20T01:00:01ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022023-02-0111144046Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]Luciano Lauria Dib0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-8303Rodrigo Salazar-Gamarra1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-9422Salvatore Binasco Lengua2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-1689Diego Eyzaguirre3Plus Identity Institute, Sao Paulo, BrazilPlus Identity Institute, Sao Paulo, BrazilPlus Identity Institute, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Engineering and Technology - UTEC, Lima, PeruBackground: Within the broad spectrum of rehabilitation, maxillofacial prostheses are those that are made to restore the appearance of a person who has suffered facial deformation due to cancer, accidents, congenital diseases, among others. Although these are not made to restore functionality, they have a major impact on restoring the patient's quality of life as it is an area so closely linked to their identity. For his reason, they have to be carefully tailored for each patient, which tends to increase cost and production time Objectives: The purpose of this research is to compare different additive manufacturing mechanisms, to evaluate which of them achieves the best reproduction of the leather details and maintains the desired dimensional properties. Methods: The manufacturing equipment will be selected comparing 7 different 3D printing of an oculo-palpebral model for a future maxillofacial prosthesis, obtained from the “Mais Identidade” Method. They were evaluated according to their economic, physical and aesthetic characteristics. Results: The results of the evaluations show that: the highest score in the economic evaluation was obtained by PhotonS; in the physical evaluation it was obtained by PhotonS, Phrozen Suffle XL and PRO95; and in the aesthetic evaluation it was obtained by PRO95 and Objet500. Finally, according to the multi-criteria evaluation, the highest score was obtained by the Photon S and PRO95.https://f1000research.com/articles/11-505/v2Maxillofacial prosthesis anaplastology Digital Models Additive Manufacturing 3D-Printingeng |
| spellingShingle | Luciano Lauria Dib Rodrigo Salazar-Gamarra Salvatore Binasco Lengua Diego Eyzaguirre Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] F1000Research Maxillofacial prosthesis anaplastology Digital Models Additive Manufacturing 3D-Printing eng |
| title | Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full | Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_short | Evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo-palpebral prosthesis [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_sort | evaluation of additive manufacturing processes in the production of oculo palpebral prosthesis version 2 peer review 1 approved 2 approved with reservations |
| topic | Maxillofacial prosthesis anaplastology Digital Models Additive Manufacturing 3D-Printing eng |
| url | https://f1000research.com/articles/11-505/v2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucianolauriadib evaluationofadditivemanufacturingprocessesintheproductionofoculopalpebralprosthesisversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT rodrigosalazargamarra evaluationofadditivemanufacturingprocessesintheproductionofoculopalpebralprosthesisversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT salvatorebinascolengua evaluationofadditivemanufacturingprocessesintheproductionofoculopalpebralprosthesisversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations AT diegoeyzaguirre evaluationofadditivemanufacturingprocessesintheproductionofoculopalpebralprosthesisversion2peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations |