Note sull’origine delle rubriche di D. 18, 2 (De in diem addictionem) e D. 18, 3 (De lege commissoria)
The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian’s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the samp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
LED Edizioni Universitarie
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Erga-Logoi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Erga-Logoi/article/view/1597 |
| Summary: | The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian’s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the sampling, in an attempt to bring the structure of the Digest into line with the material available to them) to disaggregate a ‘complex’ title D. 18, 1, already formed, extracting passages from it to form two new titles, which are the subject of the research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2280-9678 2282-3212 |