A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners

Statement of Problem: Because dental amalgam does not adhere to tooth structure, using adhesive cements in amalgam-bonded restorations have been increased. Purpose: The goal of this in-vitro study was to compare the effects of three types of glass ionomer as adhesive liners as well as varnish liner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shafiee F., Borhan Haghighi Z
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2004-08-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1953.pdf&manuscript_id=1953
_version_ 1811252195757129728
author Shafiee F.
Borhan Haghighi Z
author_facet Shafiee F.
Borhan Haghighi Z
author_sort Shafiee F.
collection DOAJ
description Statement of Problem: Because dental amalgam does not adhere to tooth structure, using adhesive cements in amalgam-bonded restorations have been increased. Purpose: The goal of this in-vitro study was to compare the effects of three types of glass ionomer as adhesive liners as well as varnish liner in increasing fracture resistance of teeth restored with amalgam. Materials and Methods: Seventy extracted human maxillary premolars were selected and MOD cavities were prepared on them excluding ten intact teeth as positive control group and ten cavity prepared teeth without restoration as negative control group. All the prepared teeth were then restored with spherical amalgam (gs.80) with one of the following liners silver alloy glass ionomer liner, conventional glass ionomer liner, varnish liner, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer with delayed light curing. The teeth were stored in 37C distilled water for 7 days and were then loaded under compressive strength using an Instron testing machine. The force required to fracture teeth were recorded and the data were analyzed statistically using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in fracture resistance between restored and non-restored samples. Comparisons between groups attributed significant effects to resin-modified glass ionomer in increasing fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth (P<0.05). In most specimens, one cusp was separated from tooth structure whereas amalgam remained bonded to the intact cusp. Conclusion: According to these findings, resin-modified glass ionomer put a statistically significant effect in fracture resistance of amalgam-restored teeth.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:31:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c449bc2e9b84a3b8e831d59db7590a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:31:15Z
publishDate 2004-08-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Medicine
spelling doaj.art-9c449bc2e9b84a3b8e831d59db7590a82022-12-22T03:25:08ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442004-08-011734855A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive linersShafiee F.Borhan Haghighi ZStatement of Problem: Because dental amalgam does not adhere to tooth structure, using adhesive cements in amalgam-bonded restorations have been increased. Purpose: The goal of this in-vitro study was to compare the effects of three types of glass ionomer as adhesive liners as well as varnish liner in increasing fracture resistance of teeth restored with amalgam. Materials and Methods: Seventy extracted human maxillary premolars were selected and MOD cavities were prepared on them excluding ten intact teeth as positive control group and ten cavity prepared teeth without restoration as negative control group. All the prepared teeth were then restored with spherical amalgam (gs.80) with one of the following liners silver alloy glass ionomer liner, conventional glass ionomer liner, varnish liner, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer with delayed light curing. The teeth were stored in 37C distilled water for 7 days and were then loaded under compressive strength using an Instron testing machine. The force required to fracture teeth were recorded and the data were analyzed statistically using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in fracture resistance between restored and non-restored samples. Comparisons between groups attributed significant effects to resin-modified glass ionomer in increasing fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth (P<0.05). In most specimens, one cusp was separated from tooth structure whereas amalgam remained bonded to the intact cusp. Conclusion: According to these findings, resin-modified glass ionomer put a statistically significant effect in fracture resistance of amalgam-restored teeth.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1953.pdf&manuscript_id=1953Adhesive linerSilver alloy glass ionomerConventional glass ionomerResinModified glass ionomer
spellingShingle Shafiee F.
Borhan Haghighi Z
A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
Journal of Dental Medicine
Adhesive liner
Silver alloy glass ionomer
Conventional glass ionomer
Resin
Modified glass ionomer
title A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
title_full A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
title_fullStr A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
title_full_unstemmed A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
title_short A comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of Glass Ionomer as adhesive liners
title_sort comparative survey on the increased fracture resistance of amalgam restored teeth using three types of glass ionomer as adhesive liners
topic Adhesive liner
Silver alloy glass ionomer
Conventional glass ionomer
Resin
Modified glass ionomer
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/1953.pdf&manuscript_id=1953
work_keys_str_mv AT shafieef acomparativesurveyontheincreasedfractureresistanceofamalgamrestoredteethusingthreetypesofglassionomerasadhesiveliners
AT borhanhaghighiz acomparativesurveyontheincreasedfractureresistanceofamalgamrestoredteethusingthreetypesofglassionomerasadhesiveliners
AT shafieef comparativesurveyontheincreasedfractureresistanceofamalgamrestoredteethusingthreetypesofglassionomerasadhesiveliners
AT borhanhaghighiz comparativesurveyontheincreasedfractureresistanceofamalgamrestoredteethusingthreetypesofglassionomerasadhesiveliners