Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries

Sea-level rise (SLR) is magnifying the frequency and severity of extreme sea levels (ESLs) that can cause coastal flooding. The rate and amount of global mean sea-level (GMSL) rise is a function of the trajectory of global mean surface temperature (GMST). Therefore, temperature stabilization targets...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D J Rasmussen, Klaus Bittermann, Maya K Buchanan, Scott Kulp, Benjamin H Strauss, Robert E Kopp, Michael Oppenheimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac87
_version_ 1797748292325474304
author D J Rasmussen
Klaus Bittermann
Maya K Buchanan
Scott Kulp
Benjamin H Strauss
Robert E Kopp
Michael Oppenheimer
author_facet D J Rasmussen
Klaus Bittermann
Maya K Buchanan
Scott Kulp
Benjamin H Strauss
Robert E Kopp
Michael Oppenheimer
author_sort D J Rasmussen
collection DOAJ
description Sea-level rise (SLR) is magnifying the frequency and severity of extreme sea levels (ESLs) that can cause coastal flooding. The rate and amount of global mean sea-level (GMSL) rise is a function of the trajectory of global mean surface temperature (GMST). Therefore, temperature stabilization targets (e.g. 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C of warming above pre-industrial levels, as from the Paris Agreement) have important implications for coastal flood risk. Here, we assess, in a global network of tide gauges, the differences in the expected frequencies of ESLs between scenarios that stabilize GMST warming at 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. We employ probabilistic, localized SLR projections and long-term hourly tide gauge records to estimate the expected frequencies of historical and future ESLs for the 21st and 22nd centuries. By 2100, under 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C GMST stabilization, the median GMSL is projected to rise 48 cm (90% probability of 28–82 cm), 56 cm (28–96 cm), and 58 cm (37–93 cm), respectively. As an independent comparison, a semi-empirical sea level model calibrated to temperature and GMSL over the past two millennia estimates median GMSL rise within 7–8 cm of these projections. By 2150, relative to the 2.0 °C scenario and based on median sea level projections, GMST stabilization of 1.5 °C spares the inundation of lands currently home to about 5 million people, including 60 000 individuals currently residing in Small Island Developing States. We quantify projected changes to the expected frequency of historical 10-, 100-, and 500-year ESL events using frequency amplification factors that incorporate uncertainty in both local SLR and historical return periods of ESLs. By 2150, relative to a 2.0 °C scenario, the reduction in the frequency amplification of the historical 100 year ESL event arising from a 1.5 °C GMST stabilization is greatest in the eastern United States, with ESL event frequency amplification being reduced by about half at most tide gauges. In general, smaller reductions are projected for Small Island Developing States.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:03:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c500842976c46dbb77e6b34c4442613
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:03:48Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-9c500842976c46dbb77e6b34c44426132023-08-09T14:31:22ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262018-01-0113303404010.1088/1748-9326/aaac87Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuriesD J Rasmussen0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4668-5749Klaus Bittermann1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-6339Maya K Buchanan2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9806-1132Scott Kulp3Benjamin H Strauss4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-6575Robert E Kopp5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-9428Michael Oppenheimer6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-5914Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs , Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences , Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam , GermanyWoodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs , Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America; ICF International (Climate Adaptation and Resilience) , New York, NY, United States of AmericaClimate Central , Princeton, NJ, United States of AmericaClimate Central , Princeton, NJ, United States of AmericaDepartment of Earth & Planetary Sciences and Institute of Earth , Ocean, & Atmospheric Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of AmericaWoodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs , Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America; Department of Geosciences , Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of AmericaSea-level rise (SLR) is magnifying the frequency and severity of extreme sea levels (ESLs) that can cause coastal flooding. The rate and amount of global mean sea-level (GMSL) rise is a function of the trajectory of global mean surface temperature (GMST). Therefore, temperature stabilization targets (e.g. 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C of warming above pre-industrial levels, as from the Paris Agreement) have important implications for coastal flood risk. Here, we assess, in a global network of tide gauges, the differences in the expected frequencies of ESLs between scenarios that stabilize GMST warming at 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. We employ probabilistic, localized SLR projections and long-term hourly tide gauge records to estimate the expected frequencies of historical and future ESLs for the 21st and 22nd centuries. By 2100, under 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C GMST stabilization, the median GMSL is projected to rise 48 cm (90% probability of 28–82 cm), 56 cm (28–96 cm), and 58 cm (37–93 cm), respectively. As an independent comparison, a semi-empirical sea level model calibrated to temperature and GMSL over the past two millennia estimates median GMSL rise within 7–8 cm of these projections. By 2150, relative to the 2.0 °C scenario and based on median sea level projections, GMST stabilization of 1.5 °C spares the inundation of lands currently home to about 5 million people, including 60 000 individuals currently residing in Small Island Developing States. We quantify projected changes to the expected frequency of historical 10-, 100-, and 500-year ESL events using frequency amplification factors that incorporate uncertainty in both local SLR and historical return periods of ESLs. By 2150, relative to a 2.0 °C scenario, the reduction in the frequency amplification of the historical 100 year ESL event arising from a 1.5 °C GMST stabilization is greatest in the eastern United States, with ESL event frequency amplification being reduced by about half at most tide gauges. In general, smaller reductions are projected for Small Island Developing States.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac87sea level risecoastal floodingclimate change impactsparis agreementIPCCextreme sea levels
spellingShingle D J Rasmussen
Klaus Bittermann
Maya K Buchanan
Scott Kulp
Benjamin H Strauss
Robert E Kopp
Michael Oppenheimer
Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
Environmental Research Letters
sea level rise
coastal flooding
climate change impacts
paris agreement
IPCC
extreme sea levels
title Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
title_full Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
title_fullStr Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
title_full_unstemmed Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
title_short Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
title_sort extreme sea level implications of 1 5 °c 2 0 °c and 2 5 °c temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries
topic sea level rise
coastal flooding
climate change impacts
paris agreement
IPCC
extreme sea levels
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac87
work_keys_str_mv AT djrasmussen extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT klausbittermann extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT mayakbuchanan extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT scottkulp extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT benjaminhstrauss extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT robertekopp extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies
AT michaeloppenheimer extremesealevelimplicationsof15c20cand25ctemperaturestabilizationtargetsinthe21stand22ndcenturies