COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame

In this paper I attempt to contribute to the developing field of “political philosophy of mind.” To render concrete the notion of “affective frame,” a social situation which pre-selects for salience and valence of environmental factors relative to a subject’s life, I conduct a case study of a delete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Protevi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897215/full
_version_ 1818503370167549952
author John Protevi
John Protevi
author_facet John Protevi
John Protevi
author_sort John Protevi
collection DOAJ
description In this paper I attempt to contribute to the developing field of “political philosophy of mind.” To render concrete the notion of “affective frame,” a social situation which pre-selects for salience and valence of environmental factors relative to a subject’s life, I conduct a case study of a deleterious socially instituted affective frame, which, during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, produced individuated circumstances that came crashing down on “essential workers” who were forced into a double bind. We saw here an untenable and ultimately fatal situation that forced a choice between, on the one hand, increasing the risk of their failing to provide financial support for their family if they quit their job or reduced their hours, and on the other, increasing their risk of contracting the virus by continuing to work. The case study will thus be itself an affective frame that will bring to the fore for its readers a nexus of harmful social practices of contemporary American society. Form is reinforced by content here, as this particular affective frame brings forth a further emphasis on affect when we focus on workers simultaneously socialized into roles as breadwinners and as members of the caring professions. For those people, quitting work becomes even more difficult as they come to affirm their self-identity of being providers of affective labor for those in their care at work and of being the affective anchor of family life at home, the one who financially helps keep a roof over the heads of their loved ones as well as being the emotional backbone of the family. Hence the affective frame of “essential workers in Covid times” renders salient and affirmatively valenced their affectively laden self-image as caring helpers of those in need, at home and at work.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:23:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c6bf33a5a39443f93310ccb847c63b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:23:07Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-9c6bf33a5a39443f93310ccb847c63b92022-12-22T01:33:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-08-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.897215897215COVID-19 in the United States as affective frameJohn Protevi0John Protevi1Department of French Studies, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United StatesDepartment of Philosophy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United StatesIn this paper I attempt to contribute to the developing field of “political philosophy of mind.” To render concrete the notion of “affective frame,” a social situation which pre-selects for salience and valence of environmental factors relative to a subject’s life, I conduct a case study of a deleterious socially instituted affective frame, which, during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, produced individuated circumstances that came crashing down on “essential workers” who were forced into a double bind. We saw here an untenable and ultimately fatal situation that forced a choice between, on the one hand, increasing the risk of their failing to provide financial support for their family if they quit their job or reduced their hours, and on the other, increasing their risk of contracting the virus by continuing to work. The case study will thus be itself an affective frame that will bring to the fore for its readers a nexus of harmful social practices of contemporary American society. Form is reinforced by content here, as this particular affective frame brings forth a further emphasis on affect when we focus on workers simultaneously socialized into roles as breadwinners and as members of the caring professions. For those people, quitting work becomes even more difficult as they come to affirm their self-identity of being providers of affective labor for those in their care at work and of being the affective anchor of family life at home, the one who financially helps keep a roof over the heads of their loved ones as well as being the emotional backbone of the family. Hence the affective frame of “essential workers in Covid times” renders salient and affirmatively valenced their affectively laden self-image as caring helpers of those in need, at home and at work.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897215/fullaffectenactionDeleuzeFoucaultbiopowerracism
spellingShingle John Protevi
John Protevi
COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
Frontiers in Psychology
affect
enaction
Deleuze
Foucault
biopower
racism
title COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
title_full COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
title_fullStr COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
title_short COVID-19 in the United States as affective frame
title_sort covid 19 in the united states as affective frame
topic affect
enaction
Deleuze
Foucault
biopower
racism
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897215/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnprotevi covid19intheunitedstatesasaffectiveframe
AT johnprotevi covid19intheunitedstatesasaffectiveframe