Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
We investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either ca...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1828768732793536512 |
---|---|
author | Alexander Kranjec Gary Lupyan Anjan Chatterjee |
author_facet | Alexander Kranjec Gary Lupyan Anjan Chatterjee |
author_sort | Alexander Kranjec |
collection | DOAJ |
description | We investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either categorical spatial relations (the dots occupied different quadrants) or coordinate spatial relations (the dots occupied different positions within the same quadrant). The dot-cross configurations also varied in how readily the dot position could be lexicalized. In harder-to-name trials, crosses formed a "+" shape such that each quadrant was associated with two discrete lexicalized spatial categories (e.g., "above" and "left"). In easier-to-name trials, both crosses were rotated 45° to form an "×" shape such that quadrants were unambiguously associated with a single lexicalized spatial category (e.g., "above" or "left"). In Experiment 1, participants were more accurate when discriminating categorical information between easier-to-name categories and more accurate at discriminating coordinate spatial information within harder-to-name categories. Subsequent experiments attempted to down-regulate or up-regulate the involvement of language in task performance. Results from Experiment 2 (verbal interference) and Experiment 3 (verbal training) suggest that the observed spatial relation type-by-nameability interaction is resistant to online language manipulations previously shown to affect color and object-based perceptual processing. The results across all three experiments suggest that robust biases in the visual perception of spatial relations correlate with patterns of lexicalization, but do not appear to be modulated by language online. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:35:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9c732b2d938f44bcb6b73be3b3090db5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T13:35:09Z |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-9c732b2d938f44bcb6b73be3b3090db52022-12-22T01:05:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9860410.1371/journal.pone.0098604Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.Alexander KranjecGary LupyanAnjan ChatterjeeWe investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either categorical spatial relations (the dots occupied different quadrants) or coordinate spatial relations (the dots occupied different positions within the same quadrant). The dot-cross configurations also varied in how readily the dot position could be lexicalized. In harder-to-name trials, crosses formed a "+" shape such that each quadrant was associated with two discrete lexicalized spatial categories (e.g., "above" and "left"). In easier-to-name trials, both crosses were rotated 45° to form an "×" shape such that quadrants were unambiguously associated with a single lexicalized spatial category (e.g., "above" or "left"). In Experiment 1, participants were more accurate when discriminating categorical information between easier-to-name categories and more accurate at discriminating coordinate spatial information within harder-to-name categories. Subsequent experiments attempted to down-regulate or up-regulate the involvement of language in task performance. Results from Experiment 2 (verbal interference) and Experiment 3 (verbal training) suggest that the observed spatial relation type-by-nameability interaction is resistant to online language manipulations previously shown to affect color and object-based perceptual processing. The results across all three experiments suggest that robust biases in the visual perception of spatial relations correlate with patterns of lexicalization, but do not appear to be modulated by language online.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Alexander Kranjec Gary Lupyan Anjan Chatterjee Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. PLoS ONE |
title | Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. |
title_full | Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. |
title_fullStr | Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. |
title_full_unstemmed | Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. |
title_short | Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations. |
title_sort | categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderkranjec categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations AT garylupyan categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations AT anjanchatterjee categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations |