Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.

We investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Kranjec, Gary Lupyan, Anjan Chatterjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render
_version_ 1828768732793536512
author Alexander Kranjec
Gary Lupyan
Anjan Chatterjee
author_facet Alexander Kranjec
Gary Lupyan
Anjan Chatterjee
author_sort Alexander Kranjec
collection DOAJ
description We investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either categorical spatial relations (the dots occupied different quadrants) or coordinate spatial relations (the dots occupied different positions within the same quadrant). The dot-cross configurations also varied in how readily the dot position could be lexicalized. In harder-to-name trials, crosses formed a "+" shape such that each quadrant was associated with two discrete lexicalized spatial categories (e.g., "above" and "left"). In easier-to-name trials, both crosses were rotated 45° to form an "×" shape such that quadrants were unambiguously associated with a single lexicalized spatial category (e.g., "above" or "left"). In Experiment 1, participants were more accurate when discriminating categorical information between easier-to-name categories and more accurate at discriminating coordinate spatial information within harder-to-name categories. Subsequent experiments attempted to down-regulate or up-regulate the involvement of language in task performance. Results from Experiment 2 (verbal interference) and Experiment 3 (verbal training) suggest that the observed spatial relation type-by-nameability interaction is resistant to online language manipulations previously shown to affect color and object-based perceptual processing. The results across all three experiments suggest that robust biases in the visual perception of spatial relations correlate with patterns of lexicalization, but do not appear to be modulated by language online.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:35:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c732b2d938f44bcb6b73be3b3090db5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:35:09Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-9c732b2d938f44bcb6b73be3b3090db52022-12-22T01:05:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9860410.1371/journal.pone.0098604Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.Alexander KranjecGary LupyanAnjan ChatterjeeWe investigate the effect of spatial categories on visual perception. In three experiments, participants made same/different judgments on pairs of simultaneously presented dot-cross configurations. For different trials, the position of the dot within each cross could differ with respect to either categorical spatial relations (the dots occupied different quadrants) or coordinate spatial relations (the dots occupied different positions within the same quadrant). The dot-cross configurations also varied in how readily the dot position could be lexicalized. In harder-to-name trials, crosses formed a "+" shape such that each quadrant was associated with two discrete lexicalized spatial categories (e.g., "above" and "left"). In easier-to-name trials, both crosses were rotated 45° to form an "×" shape such that quadrants were unambiguously associated with a single lexicalized spatial category (e.g., "above" or "left"). In Experiment 1, participants were more accurate when discriminating categorical information between easier-to-name categories and more accurate at discriminating coordinate spatial information within harder-to-name categories. Subsequent experiments attempted to down-regulate or up-regulate the involvement of language in task performance. Results from Experiment 2 (verbal interference) and Experiment 3 (verbal training) suggest that the observed spatial relation type-by-nameability interaction is resistant to online language manipulations previously shown to affect color and object-based perceptual processing. The results across all three experiments suggest that robust biases in the visual perception of spatial relations correlate with patterns of lexicalization, but do not appear to be modulated by language online.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render
spellingShingle Alexander Kranjec
Gary Lupyan
Anjan Chatterjee
Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
PLoS ONE
title Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
title_full Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
title_fullStr Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
title_full_unstemmed Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
title_short Categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations.
title_sort categorical biases in perceiving spatial relations
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4037194?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderkranjec categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations
AT garylupyan categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations
AT anjanchatterjee categoricalbiasesinperceivingspatialrelations