Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19

Background: Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 result in challenges for differential diagnosis, patients referral and treatment, which negatively affect the outcomes. Aim: To identify clinical particulars of various types acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19. Material...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadezhda V. Izmozherova, Artem A. Popov, Andrey I. Tsvetkov, Leonid I. Kadnikov, Vladislav E. Ispavskii, Muraz A. Shambatov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: MONIKI 2023-11-01
Series:Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
Subjects:
Online Access:https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1774/1603
_version_ 1827595701146615808
author Nadezhda V. Izmozherova
Artem A. Popov
Andrey I. Tsvetkov
Leonid I. Kadnikov
Vladislav E. Ispavskii
Muraz A. Shambatov
author_facet Nadezhda V. Izmozherova
Artem A. Popov
Andrey I. Tsvetkov
Leonid I. Kadnikov
Vladislav E. Ispavskii
Muraz A. Shambatov
author_sort Nadezhda V. Izmozherova
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 result in challenges for differential diagnosis, patients referral and treatment, which negatively affect the outcomes. Aim: To identify clinical particulars of various types acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 202 patients with COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admitted to a primary vascular medicine center from September to December 2020. Their medical records were used for the analysis of ACS and COVID-19 clinical course, including physical and history data, laboratory and instrumental work-up. For the analysis, the patient sampling was divided into three study groups: 50 patients with unstable angina (UA), 107 patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI), and 45 patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (non-STEMI). Results: There were no differences in clinical manifestations of ACS in the study groups. As far as clinical manifestations of coronavirus infections are concerned, the patients differed significantly as per prevalence of fever and dry cough. Fever was present in 22 (44%) UA patients, 18 (17%) of STEMI patients and in 10 (22%) of non-STEMI patients (p 0.001 for comparison of 3 groups, Kruskall-Wallis test), whereas dry cough was present in 18 (36%), 19 (18%), and 14 (31%) patients, respectively (p = 0.029). Paired comparison (Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni adjustment) showed significant differences between US and STEMI groups for both symptoms. The number of involved vessels (median [25%; 75%]) in UA patients was 0 [0; 2], in STEMI and non-STEMI patients 2 [1; 3] (p 0.001). A left coronary artery stenosis was detected in 2 (6%) of the UA patients, 13 (14%) of the STEMI and 4 (13%) of the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.452); left anterior descending artery stenosis, in 12 (36%), 67 (72%) and 23 (72%) patients, respectively (p 0.001). In the pairwise comparison, there were differences between UA and STEMI groups and between UA and non-STEMI groups. A left circumflex artery stenosis was found in 7 (21%) of the UA patients, 45 (48%) of the STEMI and 18 (56%) of the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.008); the pairwise comparisons showed the difference between UA and non-STEMI study groups. A right coronary artery stenosis was identified in 9 (27%), 64 (69%) and 18 (56%) of the study patients, respectively (p 0.001); in the pairwise comparison the difference was found between the UA and STEMI group. There were significant differences in the percentage of the right descendent and right coronary artery stenosis: the right descending artery stenosis was 70% [45; 80] in the UA patients, 90% [70; 100] in the STEMI and 95% [70; 100] in the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.013), whereas the right coronary artery stenosis was 50% [45; 80], 90% [70; 100], 90% [60; 100], respectively (p = 0.018). In the pairwise comparison, the differences were found between the UA and STEMI patients in both arteries. The STEMI patients had higher TIMI thrombus grade scores than those with non-STEMI: 3 [0; 5] vs 0 [0; 4] (p = 0.023). The rates of successful percutaneous coronary intervention and achievement of TIMI flow grade 3 between them was not significantly different (p = 0.170). Conclusion: The ACS patients with ACS and COVID-19 have high thrombotic load according to coronary angiography and TIMI score in the case of STEMI and more frequent absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis in those with UA and non-STEMI. The absence of any difference in clinical manifestations of ACS and viral infection between the study groups (except fever and dry cough difference between the UA and STEMI patients) indicates that specific characteristics of the ACS course in COVID-19 patients can be identified only by coronaroangiography.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:58:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c827c4f32bf40cc9bb05a3170b98f1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-0505
2587-9294
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:58:12Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MONIKI
record_format Article
series Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
spelling doaj.art-9c827c4f32bf40cc9bb05a3170b98f1f2023-12-04T22:36:41ZrusMONIKIAlʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny2072-05052587-92942023-11-0151529030010.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-033956Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19Nadezhda V. Izmozherova0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-9657Artem A. Popov1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-2468Andrey I. Tsvetkov2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-6872Leonid I. Kadnikov3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2623-2657Vladislav E. Ispavskii4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-6474Muraz A. Shambatov5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-415XUral State Medical UniversityUral State Medical UniversityUral State Medical UniversityUral State Medical UniversityUral State Medical UniversityUral State Medical UniversityBackground: Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 result in challenges for differential diagnosis, patients referral and treatment, which negatively affect the outcomes. Aim: To identify clinical particulars of various types acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 202 patients with COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admitted to a primary vascular medicine center from September to December 2020. Their medical records were used for the analysis of ACS and COVID-19 clinical course, including physical and history data, laboratory and instrumental work-up. For the analysis, the patient sampling was divided into three study groups: 50 patients with unstable angina (UA), 107 patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI), and 45 patients with acute myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (non-STEMI). Results: There were no differences in clinical manifestations of ACS in the study groups. As far as clinical manifestations of coronavirus infections are concerned, the patients differed significantly as per prevalence of fever and dry cough. Fever was present in 22 (44%) UA patients, 18 (17%) of STEMI patients and in 10 (22%) of non-STEMI patients (p 0.001 for comparison of 3 groups, Kruskall-Wallis test), whereas dry cough was present in 18 (36%), 19 (18%), and 14 (31%) patients, respectively (p = 0.029). Paired comparison (Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni adjustment) showed significant differences between US and STEMI groups for both symptoms. The number of involved vessels (median [25%; 75%]) in UA patients was 0 [0; 2], in STEMI and non-STEMI patients 2 [1; 3] (p 0.001). A left coronary artery stenosis was detected in 2 (6%) of the UA patients, 13 (14%) of the STEMI and 4 (13%) of the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.452); left anterior descending artery stenosis, in 12 (36%), 67 (72%) and 23 (72%) patients, respectively (p 0.001). In the pairwise comparison, there were differences between UA and STEMI groups and between UA and non-STEMI groups. A left circumflex artery stenosis was found in 7 (21%) of the UA patients, 45 (48%) of the STEMI and 18 (56%) of the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.008); the pairwise comparisons showed the difference between UA and non-STEMI study groups. A right coronary artery stenosis was identified in 9 (27%), 64 (69%) and 18 (56%) of the study patients, respectively (p 0.001); in the pairwise comparison the difference was found between the UA and STEMI group. There were significant differences in the percentage of the right descendent and right coronary artery stenosis: the right descending artery stenosis was 70% [45; 80] in the UA patients, 90% [70; 100] in the STEMI and 95% [70; 100] in the non-STEMI patients (p = 0.013), whereas the right coronary artery stenosis was 50% [45; 80], 90% [70; 100], 90% [60; 100], respectively (p = 0.018). In the pairwise comparison, the differences were found between the UA and STEMI patients in both arteries. The STEMI patients had higher TIMI thrombus grade scores than those with non-STEMI: 3 [0; 5] vs 0 [0; 4] (p = 0.023). The rates of successful percutaneous coronary intervention and achievement of TIMI flow grade 3 between them was not significantly different (p = 0.170). Conclusion: The ACS patients with ACS and COVID-19 have high thrombotic load according to coronary angiography and TIMI score in the case of STEMI and more frequent absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis in those with UA and non-STEMI. The absence of any difference in clinical manifestations of ACS and viral infection between the study groups (except fever and dry cough difference between the UA and STEMI patients) indicates that specific characteristics of the ACS course in COVID-19 patients can be identified only by coronaroangiography.https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1774/1603new coronavirus diseasecovid-19unstable anginamyocardial infarctionst elevationclinical manifestations
spellingShingle Nadezhda V. Izmozherova
Artem A. Popov
Andrey I. Tsvetkov
Leonid I. Kadnikov
Vladislav E. Ispavskii
Muraz A. Shambatov
Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
Alʹmanah Kliničeskoj Mediciny
new coronavirus disease
covid-19
unstable angina
myocardial infarction
st elevation
clinical manifestations
title Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
title_full Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
title_short Clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with COVID-19
title_sort clinical particulars of acute coronary syndrome course in patients with covid 19
topic new coronavirus disease
covid-19
unstable angina
myocardial infarction
st elevation
clinical manifestations
url https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1774/1603
work_keys_str_mv AT nadezhdavizmozherova clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19
AT artemapopov clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19
AT andreyitsvetkov clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19
AT leonidikadnikov clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19
AT vladislaveispavskii clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19
AT murazashambatov clinicalparticularsofacutecoronarysyndromecourseinpatientswithcovid19