Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) with or without methionine (Met) compared to creatine (CREA) at enhancing duck’s performance, restoring tissue CREA and improving meat quality. Mulard ducklings (n = 250) were randomly assigned to control (without additive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doaa Ibrahim, Rania El Sayed, Ahmed Abdelfattah-Hassan, A. M. Morshedy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Animal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1590205
_version_ 1830083111267860480
author Doaa Ibrahim
Rania El Sayed
Ahmed Abdelfattah-Hassan
A. M. Morshedy
author_facet Doaa Ibrahim
Rania El Sayed
Ahmed Abdelfattah-Hassan
A. M. Morshedy
author_sort Doaa Ibrahim
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) with or without methionine (Met) compared to creatine (CREA) at enhancing duck’s performance, restoring tissue CREA and improving meat quality. Mulard ducklings (n = 250) were randomly assigned to control (without additives), or control plus CREA, GAA, GAA + 0.2%Met (GAAMet0.2) or GAA + 0.4%Met (GAAMet0.4) groups in a completely random experimental design. Dietary supplementation of CREA or GAA significantly increased (P < 0.05) overall weight gain and improved feed:gain ratio. Supplementation of GAA (especially GAAMet0.4 group) significantly increased (P < 0.05) carcass and breast yield. Meat pH values were higher (P < 0.05) with dietary GAA + Met or CREA. Providing of dietary GAA + Met led to higher levels of plasma CREA than dietary CREA itself. The molecular investigation indicated that dietary CREA or GAA with Met enhanced the gene expression of hepatic insulin-like growth factor-1, growth hormone and muscle myogenin. Finally, dietary GAA + Met was superior to CREA in improving duck’s performance based on molecular markers related to growth (IGF-1 and growth hormone) and myogenesis (upregulating myogenin and downregulating myostatin). Although, dietary GAA + Met enhanced muscle’s CREA loading than CREA, the long-term GAA supplementation in ducks may induce methyl-groups shortage for protein synthesis, this was resolved with Met addition in our study.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T16:14:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c87d2a7000f4520afc224b506d3dc4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-2119
0974-1844
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T16:14:44Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Animal Research
spelling doaj.art-9c87d2a7000f4520afc224b506d3dc4c2022-12-21T22:54:55ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Applied Animal Research0971-21190974-18442019-01-0147115916610.1080/09712119.2019.15902051590205Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducksDoaa Ibrahim0Rania El Sayed1Ahmed Abdelfattah-Hassan2A. M. Morshedy3Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Food Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) with or without methionine (Met) compared to creatine (CREA) at enhancing duck’s performance, restoring tissue CREA and improving meat quality. Mulard ducklings (n = 250) were randomly assigned to control (without additives), or control plus CREA, GAA, GAA + 0.2%Met (GAAMet0.2) or GAA + 0.4%Met (GAAMet0.4) groups in a completely random experimental design. Dietary supplementation of CREA or GAA significantly increased (P < 0.05) overall weight gain and improved feed:gain ratio. Supplementation of GAA (especially GAAMet0.4 group) significantly increased (P < 0.05) carcass and breast yield. Meat pH values were higher (P < 0.05) with dietary GAA + Met or CREA. Providing of dietary GAA + Met led to higher levels of plasma CREA than dietary CREA itself. The molecular investigation indicated that dietary CREA or GAA with Met enhanced the gene expression of hepatic insulin-like growth factor-1, growth hormone and muscle myogenin. Finally, dietary GAA + Met was superior to CREA in improving duck’s performance based on molecular markers related to growth (IGF-1 and growth hormone) and myogenesis (upregulating myogenin and downregulating myostatin). Although, dietary GAA + Met enhanced muscle’s CREA loading than CREA, the long-term GAA supplementation in ducks may induce methyl-groups shortage for protein synthesis, this was resolved with Met addition in our study.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1590205creagaamethionineguanidinoacetic acid metabolismigfmyogenin
spellingShingle Doaa Ibrahim
Rania El Sayed
Ahmed Abdelfattah-Hassan
A. M. Morshedy
Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
Journal of Applied Animal Research
crea
gaa
methionine
guanidinoacetic acid metabolism
igf
myogenin
title Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
title_full Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
title_fullStr Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
title_full_unstemmed Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
title_short Creatine or guanidinoacetic acid? Which is more effective at enhancing growth, tissue creatine stores, quality of meat, and genes controlling growth/myogenesis in Mulard ducks
title_sort creatine or guanidinoacetic acid which is more effective at enhancing growth tissue creatine stores quality of meat and genes controlling growth myogenesis in mulard ducks
topic crea
gaa
methionine
guanidinoacetic acid metabolism
igf
myogenin
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1590205
work_keys_str_mv AT doaaibrahim creatineorguanidinoaceticacidwhichismoreeffectiveatenhancinggrowthtissuecreatinestoresqualityofmeatandgenescontrollinggrowthmyogenesisinmulardducks
AT raniaelsayed creatineorguanidinoaceticacidwhichismoreeffectiveatenhancinggrowthtissuecreatinestoresqualityofmeatandgenescontrollinggrowthmyogenesisinmulardducks
AT ahmedabdelfattahhassan creatineorguanidinoaceticacidwhichismoreeffectiveatenhancinggrowthtissuecreatinestoresqualityofmeatandgenescontrollinggrowthmyogenesisinmulardducks
AT ammorshedy creatineorguanidinoaceticacidwhichismoreeffectiveatenhancinggrowthtissuecreatinestoresqualityofmeatandgenescontrollinggrowthmyogenesisinmulardducks