The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-call...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
2019-12-01
|
Series: | História da Historiografia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527 |
_version_ | 1811333202625691648 |
---|---|
author | Kalle Pihlainen |
author_facet | Kalle Pihlainen |
author_sort | Kalle Pihlainen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality? |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:48:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9c91d8272a144294a8bdf3526118c368 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1983-9928 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:48:36Z |
publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) |
record_format | Article |
series | História da Historiografia |
spelling | doaj.art-9c91d8272a144294a8bdf3526118c3682022-12-22T02:39:00ZengUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)História da Historiografia1983-99282019-12-01123110.15848/hh.v12i31.1527661The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading HistoryKalle Pihlainen0Tallinn UniversityIn this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527ExperienceConstructivismReception |
spellingShingle | Kalle Pihlainen The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History História da Historiografia Experience Constructivism Reception |
title | The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History |
title_full | The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History |
title_fullStr | The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History |
title_full_unstemmed | The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History |
title_short | The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History |
title_sort | possibilities of materiality in writing and reading history |
topic | Experience Constructivism Reception |
url | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kallepihlainen thepossibilitiesofmaterialityinwritingandreadinghistory AT kallepihlainen possibilitiesofmaterialityinwritingandreadinghistory |