The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History

In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-call...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kalle Pihlainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) 2019-12-01
Series:História da Historiografia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527
_version_ 1811333202625691648
author Kalle Pihlainen
author_facet Kalle Pihlainen
author_sort Kalle Pihlainen
collection DOAJ
description In this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:48:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c91d8272a144294a8bdf3526118c368
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1983-9928
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:48:36Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
record_format Article
series História da Historiografia
spelling doaj.art-9c91d8272a144294a8bdf3526118c3682022-12-22T02:39:00ZengUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP); Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)História da Historiografia1983-99282019-12-01123110.15848/hh.v12i31.1527661The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading HistoryKalle Pihlainen0Tallinn UniversityIn this article, I investigate the role of a particular kind of ‘materiality’ at work in the writing and reading of history. This involves examining the challenges posed to constructivist approaches to history by various post-linguistic-turn claims about presence and experience as well as by so-called post-narrativism. The core focus will be on outlining an argument for updating ‘narrativist’ or constructivist theory of history to deal with these recent concerns. This requires directing more attention to the relations between author, text, and reader, particularly concerning the key issues of reality, embodiment, and immersion. To demonstrate the value of approaching these relations in terms of ‘materiality,’ I consider three questions aimed at illuminating the balancing act between referentiality and invention performed in history writing as a genre: How can language ‘embody’ reality? How do referential texts encode reality? And, how could we read referential texts specifically with respect to reality?https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527ExperienceConstructivismReception
spellingShingle Kalle Pihlainen
The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
História da Historiografia
Experience
Constructivism
Reception
title The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_full The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_fullStr The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_full_unstemmed The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_short The Possibilities of ‘Materiality’ in Writing and Reading History
title_sort possibilities of materiality in writing and reading history
topic Experience
Constructivism
Reception
url https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1527
work_keys_str_mv AT kallepihlainen thepossibilitiesofmaterialityinwritingandreadinghistory
AT kallepihlainen possibilitiesofmaterialityinwritingandreadinghistory