Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases

Caregiver burden, a response to the challenges faced by those caring for sick loved ones, combines objective caregiving aspects with subjective experiences. This study aimed to describe the caregiver burden in guardians of ailing animals with dermatological and oncological pathologies. Additionally,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pollyana T. R. F. Silva, Fernanda M. Coura, Adriane P. Costa-Val
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/2/276
_version_ 1797344762003456000
author Pollyana T. R. F. Silva
Fernanda M. Coura
Adriane P. Costa-Val
author_facet Pollyana T. R. F. Silva
Fernanda M. Coura
Adriane P. Costa-Val
author_sort Pollyana T. R. F. Silva
collection DOAJ
description Caregiver burden, a response to the challenges faced by those caring for sick loved ones, combines objective caregiving aspects with subjective experiences. This study aimed to describe the caregiver burden in guardians of ailing animals with dermatological and oncological pathologies. Additionally, this study aimed to correlate the degree of caregiver burden with the duration of the animal’s treatment, disease stability, family income, owner’s age, and the number of people living in the same household responsible for the animal’s treatment. Using a cross-sectional approach, questionnaires were administered to guardians at a veterinary hospital. Out of 182 valid responses, 50.55% related to oncological patients and 49.45% to dermatological patients. Notably, 36.9% of oncological and 37.8% of dermatological guardians exhibited a clinically significant burden, with no statistical differences between the groups. Of the respondents, 84.6% were dog guardians, with 34.4% showing a significant burden. Feline guardians (15.4% of respondents) exhibited a higher burden (53.5%) compared to dog guardians (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Disease stability, time since diagnosis, and guardian age significantly influenced the burden, while household composition, income, and treatment duration showed no substantial impact. These findings underscore the psychosocial impact of caring for animals, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of the caregiver’s perspective.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:07:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c976c2ce6a041fa8f0a896012d40bdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:07:27Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-9c976c2ce6a041fa8f0a896012d40bdd2024-01-26T14:32:40ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152024-01-0114227610.3390/ani14020276Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological CasesPollyana T. R. F. Silva0Fernanda M. Coura1Adriane P. Costa-Val2Escola de Veterinária, Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 30123-970, BrazilInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais Campus Bambuí, IFMG, Faz. Varginha, Rodovia Bambuí/Medeiros, Km 05, Caixa-Postal 05, Zona Rural, Bambuí 38900-000, BrazilEscola de Veterinária, Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, UFMG, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 30123-970, BrazilCaregiver burden, a response to the challenges faced by those caring for sick loved ones, combines objective caregiving aspects with subjective experiences. This study aimed to describe the caregiver burden in guardians of ailing animals with dermatological and oncological pathologies. Additionally, this study aimed to correlate the degree of caregiver burden with the duration of the animal’s treatment, disease stability, family income, owner’s age, and the number of people living in the same household responsible for the animal’s treatment. Using a cross-sectional approach, questionnaires were administered to guardians at a veterinary hospital. Out of 182 valid responses, 50.55% related to oncological patients and 49.45% to dermatological patients. Notably, 36.9% of oncological and 37.8% of dermatological guardians exhibited a clinically significant burden, with no statistical differences between the groups. Of the respondents, 84.6% were dog guardians, with 34.4% showing a significant burden. Feline guardians (15.4% of respondents) exhibited a higher burden (53.5%) compared to dog guardians (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Disease stability, time since diagnosis, and guardian age significantly influenced the burden, while household composition, income, and treatment duration showed no substantial impact. These findings underscore the psychosocial impact of caring for animals, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of the caregiver’s perspective.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/2/276burden of carecatdoghuman–animal interactionowner
spellingShingle Pollyana T. R. F. Silva
Fernanda M. Coura
Adriane P. Costa-Val
Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
Animals
burden of care
cat
dog
human–animal interaction
owner
title Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
title_full Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
title_fullStr Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
title_full_unstemmed Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
title_short Caregiver Burden in Small Animal Clinics: A Comparative Analysis of Dermatological and Oncological Cases
title_sort caregiver burden in small animal clinics a comparative analysis of dermatological and oncological cases
topic burden of care
cat
dog
human–animal interaction
owner
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/2/276
work_keys_str_mv AT pollyanatrfsilva caregiverburdeninsmallanimalclinicsacomparativeanalysisofdermatologicalandoncologicalcases
AT fernandamcoura caregiverburdeninsmallanimalclinicsacomparativeanalysisofdermatologicalandoncologicalcases
AT adrianepcostaval caregiverburdeninsmallanimalclinicsacomparativeanalysisofdermatologicalandoncologicalcases