Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism

Inspired by Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), we develop an argument—the “Scriptural Argument Against Dogmatic Protestantism” (SAADP)—that Protestants who accept the doctrine of sola scriptura cannot reasonably hold that Catholic and Eastern churches are in doctrinal erro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory Stacey, Tyler McNabb
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Catholic University of Louvain 2024-03-01
Series:TheoLogica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/79213
_version_ 1797242699674288128
author Gregory Stacey
Tyler McNabb
author_facet Gregory Stacey
Tyler McNabb
author_sort Gregory Stacey
collection DOAJ
description Inspired by Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), we develop an argument—the “Scriptural Argument Against Dogmatic Protestantism” (SAADP)—that Protestants who accept the doctrine of sola scriptura cannot reasonably hold that Catholic and Eastern churches are in doctrinal error. If sola scriptura is true and Catholic and Eastern Churches have fallen into error, it is improbable that any Protestant can reliably form true beliefs about controversial points of Christian doctrine, including sola scriptura or suggestions that Catholic and Eastern Christians are in error. We evaluate potential responses to SADDP, considering how SAADP should affect ecumenical doctrinal debates.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:43:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c9945eab65448c4a64dfafde5619356
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2593-0265
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:43:23Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Catholic University of Louvain
record_format Article
series TheoLogica
spelling doaj.art-9c9945eab65448c4a64dfafde56193562024-03-27T08:47:45ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652024-03-019110.14428/thl.v9i1.79213Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against NaturalismGregory Stacey0Tyler McNabb1University of LeedsSaint Francis University Inspired by Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), we develop an argument—the “Scriptural Argument Against Dogmatic Protestantism” (SAADP)—that Protestants who accept the doctrine of sola scriptura cannot reasonably hold that Catholic and Eastern churches are in doctrinal error. If sola scriptura is true and Catholic and Eastern Churches have fallen into error, it is improbable that any Protestant can reliably form true beliefs about controversial points of Christian doctrine, including sola scriptura or suggestions that Catholic and Eastern Christians are in error. We evaluate potential responses to SADDP, considering how SAADP should affect ecumenical doctrinal debates. https://www.bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/79213ScriptureSola ScripturaProtestantismEvolutionary Argument Against NaturalismAlvin Plantinga
spellingShingle Gregory Stacey
Tyler McNabb
Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
TheoLogica
Scripture
Sola Scriptura
Protestantism
Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
Alvin Plantinga
title Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
title_full Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
title_fullStr Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
title_full_unstemmed Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
title_short Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
title_sort sola scriptura and the evolutionary argument against naturalism
topic Scripture
Sola Scriptura
Protestantism
Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
Alvin Plantinga
url https://www.bdd.rdplf.org/index.php/theologica/article/view/79213
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorystacey solascripturaandtheevolutionaryargumentagainstnaturalism
AT tylermcnabb solascripturaandtheevolutionaryargumentagainstnaturalism