Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study

Abstract Background Although placement of an intra-cerebral catheter remains the gold standard method for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), several non-invasive techniques can provide useful estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of four non-invasive methods to assess intr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiara Robba, Selene Pozzebon, Bedrana Moro, Jean-Louis Vincent, Jacques Creteur, Fabio Silvio Taccone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-020-03105-z
_version_ 1818153499334017024
author Chiara Robba
Selene Pozzebon
Bedrana Moro
Jean-Louis Vincent
Jacques Creteur
Fabio Silvio Taccone
author_facet Chiara Robba
Selene Pozzebon
Bedrana Moro
Jean-Louis Vincent
Jacques Creteur
Fabio Silvio Taccone
author_sort Chiara Robba
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Although placement of an intra-cerebral catheter remains the gold standard method for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), several non-invasive techniques can provide useful estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of four non-invasive methods to assess intracranial hypertension. Methods We reviewed prospectively collected data on adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in whom invasive ICP monitoring had been initiated and estimates had been simultaneously collected from the following non-invasive indices: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI), estimated ICP (eICP) using transcranial Doppler, and the neurological pupil index (NPI) measured using automated pupillometry. Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured ICP > 20 mmHg. Results We studied 100 patients (TBI = 30; SAH = 47; ICH = 23) with a median age of 52 years. The median invasively measured ICP was 17 [12–25] mmHg and intracranial hypertension was present in 37 patients. Median values from the non-invasive techniques were ONSD 5.2 [4.8–5.8] mm, PI 1.1 [0.9–1.4], eICP 21 [14–29] mmHg, and NPI 4.2 [3.8–4.6]. There was a significant correlation between all the non-invasive techniques and invasive ICP (ONSD, r = 0.54; PI, r = 0.50; eICP, r = 0.61; NPI, r = − 0.41—p < 0.001 for all). The area under the curve (AUC) to estimate intracranial hypertension was 0.78 [CIs = 0.68–0.88] for ONSD, 0.85 [95% CIs 0.77–0.93] for PI, 0.86 [95% CIs 0.77–0.93] for eICP, and 0.71 [95% CIs 0.60–0.82] for NPI. When the various techniques were combined, the highest AUC (0.91 [0.84–0.97]) was obtained with the combination of ONSD with eICP. Conclusions Non-invasive techniques are correlated with ICP and have an acceptable accuracy to estimate intracranial hypertension. The multimodal combination of ONSD and eICP may increase the accuracy to estimate the occurrence of intracranial hypertension.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:11:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9c999e4a43bc4201beb6bec2c24c2f0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1364-8535
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:11:35Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Critical Care
spelling doaj.art-9c999e4a43bc4201beb6bec2c24c2f0f2022-12-22T01:03:25ZengBMCCritical Care1364-85352020-06-0124111010.1186/s13054-020-03105-zMultimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational studyChiara Robba0Selene Pozzebon1Bedrana Moro2Jean-Louis Vincent3Jacques Creteur4Fabio Silvio Taccone5Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS For Oncology and Neuroscience, Department of Integrated Surgical and Diagnostic Science, University of GenovaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de BruxellesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de BruxellesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de BruxellesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de BruxellesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de BruxellesAbstract Background Although placement of an intra-cerebral catheter remains the gold standard method for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), several non-invasive techniques can provide useful estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of four non-invasive methods to assess intracranial hypertension. Methods We reviewed prospectively collected data on adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in whom invasive ICP monitoring had been initiated and estimates had been simultaneously collected from the following non-invasive indices: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI), estimated ICP (eICP) using transcranial Doppler, and the neurological pupil index (NPI) measured using automated pupillometry. Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured ICP > 20 mmHg. Results We studied 100 patients (TBI = 30; SAH = 47; ICH = 23) with a median age of 52 years. The median invasively measured ICP was 17 [12–25] mmHg and intracranial hypertension was present in 37 patients. Median values from the non-invasive techniques were ONSD 5.2 [4.8–5.8] mm, PI 1.1 [0.9–1.4], eICP 21 [14–29] mmHg, and NPI 4.2 [3.8–4.6]. There was a significant correlation between all the non-invasive techniques and invasive ICP (ONSD, r = 0.54; PI, r = 0.50; eICP, r = 0.61; NPI, r = − 0.41—p < 0.001 for all). The area under the curve (AUC) to estimate intracranial hypertension was 0.78 [CIs = 0.68–0.88] for ONSD, 0.85 [95% CIs 0.77–0.93] for PI, 0.86 [95% CIs 0.77–0.93] for eICP, and 0.71 [95% CIs 0.60–0.82] for NPI. When the various techniques were combined, the highest AUC (0.91 [0.84–0.97]) was obtained with the combination of ONSD with eICP. Conclusions Non-invasive techniques are correlated with ICP and have an acceptable accuracy to estimate intracranial hypertension. The multimodal combination of ONSD and eICP may increase the accuracy to estimate the occurrence of intracranial hypertension.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-020-03105-zNeuro-ICUNon-invasive intracranial pressureBrain injuryPupillometerOptic nerve sheath diameter
spellingShingle Chiara Robba
Selene Pozzebon
Bedrana Moro
Jean-Louis Vincent
Jacques Creteur
Fabio Silvio Taccone
Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
Critical Care
Neuro-ICU
Non-invasive intracranial pressure
Brain injury
Pupillometer
Optic nerve sheath diameter
title Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
title_full Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
title_fullStr Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
title_short Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study
title_sort multimodal non invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension an observational study
topic Neuro-ICU
Non-invasive intracranial pressure
Brain injury
Pupillometer
Optic nerve sheath diameter
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-020-03105-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chiararobba multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy
AT selenepozzebon multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy
AT bedranamoro multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy
AT jeanlouisvincent multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy
AT jacquescreteur multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy
AT fabiosilviotaccone multimodalnoninvasiveassessmentofintracranialhypertensionanobservationalstudy