Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts

This study examines the approaches of Islamic political texts to social and political issues, both in classical and modern ages. The classical texts can be classified in two different traditions; namely, those which adopt a Greek-style discourse, such as al-Fārābī’s political works and those which p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammet Özdemir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Anadolu Ilahiyat Akademisi 2018-12-01
Series:Eskiyeni
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/587549
_version_ 1797234632060567552
author Muhammet Özdemir
author_facet Muhammet Özdemir
author_sort Muhammet Özdemir
collection DOAJ
description This study examines the approaches of Islamic political texts to social and political issues, both in classical and modern ages. The classical texts can be classified in two different traditions; namely, those which adopt a Greek-style discourse, such as al-Fārābī’s political works and those which prefers al-fiqh traditional and bureaucratic style, such as al-Māwardī’s and Nizām al-Mulk’s works. On the other hand, Islamic political texts of mo-dern era entertain mainly reflexive and defensive strategies, presupposing an ideal age in the past as a point of departure and return. This is the case in al-Mawdūdī’s and Sayyid Qutb’s works. The thoughts of Niccolò Machiavelli, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and especially those of John Rawls are taken as analyzing criteria in this study. In the scope of epistemology and political philosophy, the Anglo-Saxon tradition has some corresponding cultural goods which can be appropriated for the political needs of modern Islamic societies. On that note, it appears that there are two main approaches in the political philosophy, namely “the conceptualistic approach” and “the experimental approach”. The political works of al-Fārābī, al-Mawdūdī and Qutb employ the conceptualistic approach. While the works of al-Māwardī, Nizām al-Mulk, Niccolò Machiavelli, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and especially John Rawls use the experimental approach.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:06:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cb0adceabbf4448926da39799fb6d35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2636-8536
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:35:09Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Anadolu Ilahiyat Akademisi
record_format Article
series Eskiyeni
spelling doaj.art-9cb0adceabbf4448926da39799fb6d352024-03-29T20:34:57ZengAnadolu Ilahiyat AkademisiEskiyeni2636-85362018-12-01377241354Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern TextsMuhammet Özdemir0SOSYAL VE BEŞERİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİThis study examines the approaches of Islamic political texts to social and political issues, both in classical and modern ages. The classical texts can be classified in two different traditions; namely, those which adopt a Greek-style discourse, such as al-Fārābī’s political works and those which prefers al-fiqh traditional and bureaucratic style, such as al-Māwardī’s and Nizām al-Mulk’s works. On the other hand, Islamic political texts of mo-dern era entertain mainly reflexive and defensive strategies, presupposing an ideal age in the past as a point of departure and return. This is the case in al-Mawdūdī’s and Sayyid Qutb’s works. The thoughts of Niccolò Machiavelli, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and especially those of John Rawls are taken as analyzing criteria in this study. In the scope of epistemology and political philosophy, the Anglo-Saxon tradition has some corresponding cultural goods which can be appropriated for the political needs of modern Islamic societies. On that note, it appears that there are two main approaches in the political philosophy, namely “the conceptualistic approach” and “the experimental approach”. The political works of al-Fārābī, al-Mawdūdī and Qutb employ the conceptualistic approach. While the works of al-Māwardī, Nizām al-Mulk, Niccolò Machiavelli, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and especially John Rawls use the experimental approach.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/587549islamic political philosophyal-fārābīal-māwardīnizām al-mulkal-mawdūdīsayyid qutbjohn rawlsthe conceptualistic approachjohn rawlsi̇slâm siyaset felsefesifârâbîmâverdînizâmülmülkmevdûdîseyyid kutubkavramcı yaklaşım
spellingShingle Muhammet Özdemir
Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
Eskiyeni
islamic political philosophy
al-fārābī
al-māwardī
nizām al-mulk
al-mawdūdī
sayyid qutb
john rawls
the conceptualistic approach
john rawls
i̇slâm siyaset felsefesi
fârâbî
mâverdî
nizâmülmülk
mevdûdî
seyyid kutub
kavramcı yaklaşım
title Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
title_full Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
title_fullStr Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
title_full_unstemmed Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
title_short Problems of Islamic Political Philosophy in Classical and Modern Texts
title_sort problems of islamic political philosophy in classical and modern texts
topic islamic political philosophy
al-fārābī
al-māwardī
nizām al-mulk
al-mawdūdī
sayyid qutb
john rawls
the conceptualistic approach
john rawls
i̇slâm siyaset felsefesi
fârâbî
mâverdî
nizâmülmülk
mevdûdî
seyyid kutub
kavramcı yaklaşım
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/587549
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammetozdemir problemsofislamicpoliticalphilosophyinclassicalandmoderntexts