Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems

In this study, we reviewed aircraft accidents in order to understand how autonomy and safety has been managed in the aviation industry, with the aim of transferring our findings to autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPSs) in general. Through the qualitative analysis of 26 reports of aircraft acciden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chara Makri, Didem Gürdür Broo, Andy Neely
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/10/6/120
_version_ 1797455114849484800
author Chara Makri
Didem Gürdür Broo
Andy Neely
author_facet Chara Makri
Didem Gürdür Broo
Andy Neely
author_sort Chara Makri
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we reviewed aircraft accidents in order to understand how autonomy and safety has been managed in the aviation industry, with the aim of transferring our findings to autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPSs) in general. Through the qualitative analysis of 26 reports of aircraft accidents that took place from 2016 to 2022, we identified the most common contributing factors and the actors involved in aircraft accidents. We found that accidents were rarely the result of a single event or actor, with the most common contributing factor being non-adherence to standard operating procedures (SOPs). Considering that the aviation industry has had decades to perfect their SOPs, it is important for CPSs not only to consider the actors and causes that may contribute to safety-related issues, but also to consider well-defined reporting practices, as well as the different levels of mechanisms checked by diverse stakeholders, in order to minimise the cascading nature of such events to improve safety. In addition to proposing a new definition of safety, in this study we suggest reviewing high-reliability organisations to offer further insights as part of future research on CPS safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:47:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cb2280803fe42ccb91fa1c4cfa15fc1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7080
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:47:53Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Technologies
spelling doaj.art-9cb2280803fe42ccb91fa1c4cfa15fc12023-11-24T18:23:05ZengMDPI AGTechnologies2227-70802022-11-0110612010.3390/technologies10060120Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical SystemsChara Makri0Didem Gürdür Broo1Andy Neely2Centre for Digital Built Britain, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, UKCenter for Design Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USAInstitute for Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UKIn this study, we reviewed aircraft accidents in order to understand how autonomy and safety has been managed in the aviation industry, with the aim of transferring our findings to autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPSs) in general. Through the qualitative analysis of 26 reports of aircraft accidents that took place from 2016 to 2022, we identified the most common contributing factors and the actors involved in aircraft accidents. We found that accidents were rarely the result of a single event or actor, with the most common contributing factor being non-adherence to standard operating procedures (SOPs). Considering that the aviation industry has had decades to perfect their SOPs, it is important for CPSs not only to consider the actors and causes that may contribute to safety-related issues, but also to consider well-defined reporting practices, as well as the different levels of mechanisms checked by diverse stakeholders, in order to minimise the cascading nature of such events to improve safety. In addition to proposing a new definition of safety, in this study we suggest reviewing high-reliability organisations to offer further insights as part of future research on CPS safety.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/10/6/120cyber-physical systemshuman-in-loop decision-makingautonomyaccountabilitythrough-life accountabilitysafety
spellingShingle Chara Makri
Didem Gürdür Broo
Andy Neely
Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
Technologies
cyber-physical systems
human-in-loop decision-making
autonomy
accountability
through-life accountability
safety
title Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
title_full Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
title_fullStr Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
title_full_unstemmed Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
title_short Human-in-Loop Decision-Making and Autonomy: Lessons Learnt from the Aviation Industry Transferred to Cyber-Physical Systems
title_sort human in loop decision making and autonomy lessons learnt from the aviation industry transferred to cyber physical systems
topic cyber-physical systems
human-in-loop decision-making
autonomy
accountability
through-life accountability
safety
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/10/6/120
work_keys_str_mv AT charamakri humaninloopdecisionmakingandautonomylessonslearntfromtheaviationindustrytransferredtocyberphysicalsystems
AT didemgurdurbroo humaninloopdecisionmakingandautonomylessonslearntfromtheaviationindustrytransferredtocyberphysicalsystems
AT andyneely humaninloopdecisionmakingandautonomylessonslearntfromtheaviationindustrytransferredtocyberphysicalsystems