How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations

Background:. There is no consensus regarding implant size as an independent risk factor for complications in primary breast augmentation. Choosing appropriate implant volume is an integral part of the preoperative planning process. The current study aims to assess the relationship between implant si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria C. Medor, MD, Gabriel Bouhadana, MD, Isabella F. Churchill, MSc, Thomas Hemmerling, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Michelle Bonapace-Potvin, MD, Constantine Papanastasiou, MD, MSc, Abiye Mussie, MD, Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, MBA, FRCSC, Vasilios W. Papanastasiou, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-03-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004843
_version_ 1797859635633324032
author Maria C. Medor, MD
Gabriel Bouhadana, MD
Isabella F. Churchill, MSc
Thomas Hemmerling, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Michelle Bonapace-Potvin, MD
Constantine Papanastasiou, MD, MSc
Abiye Mussie, MD
Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, MBA, FRCSC
Vasilios W. Papanastasiou, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC
author_facet Maria C. Medor, MD
Gabriel Bouhadana, MD
Isabella F. Churchill, MSc
Thomas Hemmerling, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Michelle Bonapace-Potvin, MD
Constantine Papanastasiou, MD, MSc
Abiye Mussie, MD
Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, MBA, FRCSC
Vasilios W. Papanastasiou, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC
author_sort Maria C. Medor, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. There is no consensus regarding implant size as an independent risk factor for complications in primary breast augmentation. Choosing appropriate implant volume is an integral part of the preoperative planning process. The current study aims to assess the relationship between implant size and the development of complications following augmentation mammaplasty. Methods:. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary breast augmentation at the Westmount Institute of Plastic Surgery between January 2000 and December 2021 was conducted. Demographics, implant characteristics, surgical technique, postoperative complications, and follow-up times were recorded. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, which were then included in multivariate logistic regressions of implant volume and implant volume/body mass index (BMI) ratio regarding complications. Results:. A total of 1017 patients (2034 breasts) were included in this study. The average implant volume used was 321.4 ± 57.5 cm3 (range: 110–605). Increased volume and volume/BMI ratio were associated with a significant increase in risk of implant rupture (odds ratio = 1.012, P < 0.001 and 1.282, P < 0.001 respectively). Rates of asymmetry were significantly associated with increases in implant volume and volume/BMI ratio (odds ratio = 1.005, P = 0.004 and 1.151, P < 0.001, respectively). No single implant volume or volume/BMI ratio above which risks of complications significantly increase was identified. Conclusions:. Implant rupture and postoperative asymmetries are positively correlated with bigger implant volumes. Implant size could likely be a useful independent predictor of certain complications, especially in patients with high implant to BMI ratios.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:32:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cbd6ab41f75406394258ac3b6c92fda
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-7574
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:32:45Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
spelling doaj.art-9cbd6ab41f75406394258ac3b6c92fda2023-03-27T06:47:44ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742023-03-01113e484310.1097/GOX.0000000000004843202303000-00019How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast AugmentationsMaria C. Medor, MD0Gabriel Bouhadana, MD1Isabella F. Churchill, MSc2Thomas Hemmerling, MD, MSc, FRCSC3Michelle Bonapace-Potvin, MD4Constantine Papanastasiou, MD, MSc5Abiye Mussie, MD6Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, MBA, FRCSC7Vasilios W. Papanastasiou, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC8From the * Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montreal, Montreal, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada† Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada‡ Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada§ Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada† Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaFrom the * Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada¶ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Background:. There is no consensus regarding implant size as an independent risk factor for complications in primary breast augmentation. Choosing appropriate implant volume is an integral part of the preoperative planning process. The current study aims to assess the relationship between implant size and the development of complications following augmentation mammaplasty. Methods:. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary breast augmentation at the Westmount Institute of Plastic Surgery between January 2000 and December 2021 was conducted. Demographics, implant characteristics, surgical technique, postoperative complications, and follow-up times were recorded. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, which were then included in multivariate logistic regressions of implant volume and implant volume/body mass index (BMI) ratio regarding complications. Results:. A total of 1017 patients (2034 breasts) were included in this study. The average implant volume used was 321.4 ± 57.5 cm3 (range: 110–605). Increased volume and volume/BMI ratio were associated with a significant increase in risk of implant rupture (odds ratio = 1.012, P < 0.001 and 1.282, P < 0.001 respectively). Rates of asymmetry were significantly associated with increases in implant volume and volume/BMI ratio (odds ratio = 1.005, P = 0.004 and 1.151, P < 0.001, respectively). No single implant volume or volume/BMI ratio above which risks of complications significantly increase was identified. Conclusions:. Implant rupture and postoperative asymmetries are positively correlated with bigger implant volumes. Implant size could likely be a useful independent predictor of certain complications, especially in patients with high implant to BMI ratios.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004843
spellingShingle Maria C. Medor, MD
Gabriel Bouhadana, MD
Isabella F. Churchill, MSc
Thomas Hemmerling, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Michelle Bonapace-Potvin, MD
Constantine Papanastasiou, MD, MSc
Abiye Mussie, MD
Daniel E. Borsuk, MD, MBA, FRCSC
Vasilios W. Papanastasiou, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC
How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
title How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
title_full How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
title_fullStr How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
title_full_unstemmed How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
title_short How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations
title_sort how big is too big exploring the relationship between breast implant volume and postoperative complication rates in primary breast augmentations
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004843
work_keys_str_mv AT mariacmedormd howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT gabrielbouhadanamd howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT isabellafchurchillmsc howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT thomashemmerlingmdmscfrcsc howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT michellebonapacepotvinmd howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT constantinepapanastasioumdmsc howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT abiyemussiemd howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT danieleborsukmdmbafrcsc howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations
AT vasilioswpapanastasioumdcmmscfrcsc howbigistoobigexploringtherelationshipbetweenbreastimplantvolumeandpostoperativecomplicationratesinprimarybreastaugmentations