Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?

Background: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomohiro Fujiwara, Yusuke Tsuda, Jonathan Stevenson, Michael Parry, Lee Jeys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Bone Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137421000567
_version_ 1818752911201533952
author Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
author_facet Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
author_sort Tomohiro Fujiwara
collection DOAJ
description Background: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Methods: We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54). Results: There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed. Conclusion: Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T04:58:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f95
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2212-1374
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T04:58:59Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Bone Oncology
spelling doaj.art-9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f952022-12-21T21:20:12ZengElsevierJournal of Bone Oncology2212-13742021-12-0131100401Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?Tomohiro Fujiwara0Yusuke Tsuda1Jonathan Stevenson2Michael Parry3Lee Jeys4Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan; Corresponding author at: The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomOncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomOncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomOncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United KingdomBackground: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Methods: We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54). Results: There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed. Conclusion: Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137421000567SarcomaPelvisExtra-articular resectionIntra-articular resectionHip joint
spellingShingle Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
Journal of Bone Oncology
Sarcoma
Pelvis
Extra-articular resection
Intra-articular resection
Hip joint
title Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_full Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_fullStr Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_full_unstemmed Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_short Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_sort extra articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra articular resection
topic Sarcoma
Pelvis
Extra-articular resection
Intra-articular resection
Hip joint
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137421000567
work_keys_str_mv AT tomohirofujiwara extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT yusuketsuda extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT jonathanstevenson extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT michaelparry extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT leejeys extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection