The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015

Previous analysis of U.S. physician office visits (1993–2007) indicated that the medicalization of sleeplessness was on the rise and had potentially negative implications for population health. Our study asks if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction has pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mairead Eastin Moloney, Gabriele Ciciurkaite, Robyn Lewis Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-08-01
Series:SSM: Population Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827318302970
_version_ 1818970083621339136
author Mairead Eastin Moloney
Gabriele Ciciurkaite
Robyn Lewis Brown
author_facet Mairead Eastin Moloney
Gabriele Ciciurkaite
Robyn Lewis Brown
author_sort Mairead Eastin Moloney
collection DOAJ
description Previous analysis of U.S. physician office visits (1993–2007) indicated that the medicalization of sleeplessness was on the rise and had potentially negative implications for population health. Our study asks if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction has persisted over time. Using the most recent years available (2008–2015) of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey we calculated nationally representative estimates for four sleeplessness-related outcomes of physician office visits: sleeplessness complaint, insomnia diagnosis, and prescription of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics (NBSH). To test for the significance of the linear trajectory, we ran a series of bivariate linear models. We tested three hypotheses grounded in the medicalization framework: if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the interactional level is continuing at a rate comparable to previous analyses, sleeplessness-related outcomes will continue to increase significantly over time (Hypothesis 1); NBSH prescriptions and insomnia diagnoses will continue to outpace sleeplessness complaints (Hypothesis 2); and insomnia diagnoses and use of sedative-hypnotics will increase or remain concentrated among age groups who lack the changing sleep patterns and commonly occurring comorbidities associated with older age (Hypothesis 3). Support for these hypotheses was mixed. Unlike previous analyses wherein all sleeplessness-related outcome trends were positive and statistically significant over time, regression analyses revealed a significant negative NBSH prescription trend 2008–2015 (slope, b = −699,628, P < 0.05). No other associations were significant. Younger age groups were most likely to receive an insomnia diagnosis and NBSH prescription. These trends imply that the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction may be on the decline. We suggest that increasingly negative portrayals of sedative-hypnotics, conservative practice recommendations, and decreased direct-to-consumer advertising for NBSH may decrease consumerism and physician compliance related to the medicalization of sleeplessness. We conclude with a discussion on non-pharmaceutical methods of reducing sleeplessness relevant to population health. Keywords: US, Sleeplessness, Physician office visits, Medicalization, Sedative-hypnotics
first_indexed 2024-12-20T14:30:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cd44533f0c74346a2c6f4b52db52bb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8273
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T14:30:51Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Population Health
spelling doaj.art-9cd44533f0c74346a2c6f4b52db52bb72022-12-21T19:37:38ZengElsevierSSM: Population Health2352-82732019-08-018The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015Mairead Eastin Moloney0Gabriele Ciciurkaite1Robyn Lewis Brown21515 Patterson Office Tower, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0027, USA; Corresponding author.224E Old Main, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322-0730, USA1515 Patterson Office Tower, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0027, USAPrevious analysis of U.S. physician office visits (1993–2007) indicated that the medicalization of sleeplessness was on the rise and had potentially negative implications for population health. Our study asks if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction has persisted over time. Using the most recent years available (2008–2015) of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey we calculated nationally representative estimates for four sleeplessness-related outcomes of physician office visits: sleeplessness complaint, insomnia diagnosis, and prescription of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics (NBSH). To test for the significance of the linear trajectory, we ran a series of bivariate linear models. We tested three hypotheses grounded in the medicalization framework: if the medicalization of sleeplessness at the interactional level is continuing at a rate comparable to previous analyses, sleeplessness-related outcomes will continue to increase significantly over time (Hypothesis 1); NBSH prescriptions and insomnia diagnoses will continue to outpace sleeplessness complaints (Hypothesis 2); and insomnia diagnoses and use of sedative-hypnotics will increase or remain concentrated among age groups who lack the changing sleep patterns and commonly occurring comorbidities associated with older age (Hypothesis 3). Support for these hypotheses was mixed. Unlike previous analyses wherein all sleeplessness-related outcome trends were positive and statistically significant over time, regression analyses revealed a significant negative NBSH prescription trend 2008–2015 (slope, b = −699,628, P < 0.05). No other associations were significant. Younger age groups were most likely to receive an insomnia diagnosis and NBSH prescription. These trends imply that the medicalization of sleeplessness at the level of patient-physician interaction may be on the decline. We suggest that increasingly negative portrayals of sedative-hypnotics, conservative practice recommendations, and decreased direct-to-consumer advertising for NBSH may decrease consumerism and physician compliance related to the medicalization of sleeplessness. We conclude with a discussion on non-pharmaceutical methods of reducing sleeplessness relevant to population health. Keywords: US, Sleeplessness, Physician office visits, Medicalization, Sedative-hypnoticshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827318302970
spellingShingle Mairead Eastin Moloney
Gabriele Ciciurkaite
Robyn Lewis Brown
The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
SSM: Population Health
title The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
title_full The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
title_fullStr The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
title_full_unstemmed The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
title_short The medicalization of sleeplessness: Results of U.S. office visit outcomes, 2008–2015
title_sort medicalization of sleeplessness results of u s office visit outcomes 2008 2015
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827318302970
work_keys_str_mv AT maireadeastinmoloney themedicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015
AT gabrieleciciurkaite themedicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015
AT robynlewisbrown themedicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015
AT maireadeastinmoloney medicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015
AT gabrieleciciurkaite medicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015
AT robynlewisbrown medicalizationofsleeplessnessresultsofusofficevisitoutcomes20082015