Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement

This paper focuses on the analysis of the plasticity effect in the measurement of the residual stress by the hole-drilling method. Relaxed strains were evaluated by the computational simulation of the hole-drilling experiment using the finite element method. Errors induced by the yielding were estim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomáš Návrat, Dávid Halabuk, Petr Vosynek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/15/3396
_version_ 1797560710896549888
author Tomáš Návrat
Dávid Halabuk
Petr Vosynek
author_facet Tomáš Návrat
Dávid Halabuk
Petr Vosynek
author_sort Tomáš Návrat
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the analysis of the plasticity effect in the measurement of the residual stress by the hole-drilling method. Relaxed strains were evaluated by the computational simulation of the hole-drilling experiment using the finite element method. Errors induced by the yielding were estimated for uniaxial tension, plane shear stress state and equi-biaxial stress state at various magnitudes of residual stress uniformly distributed along the depth. The correction of the plasticity effect in the evaluation of residual stress was realized according to the method proposed by authors from the University in Pisa, which was coded in MATLAB. Results obtained from the MATLAB script were compared to the original input data of the hole-drilling simulation and discussed. The analyses suggested that the plasticity effect is negligible at the ratio of applied equivalent stress to yield stress, being 0.6, and that the correction of the plasticity effect is very successful at the previous ratio, being 0.9. Failing to comply with the condition of the strain gauge rosette orientation according to the principal stresses directions causes an increase in the relative error of corrected stresses only for the case of uniaxial tension. It affects the relative error negligibly for the plane shear and equi-biaxial stress states.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:04:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cdd29c4c2144e3591d0c4636c45bd6d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:04:25Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-9cdd29c4c2144e3591d0c4636c45bd6d2023-11-20T08:39:39ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-07-011315339610.3390/ma13153396Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress MeasurementTomáš Návrat0Dávid Halabuk1Petr Vosynek2Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 61669 Brno, Czech RepublicInstitute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 61669 Brno, Czech RepublicInstitute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 61669 Brno, Czech RepublicThis paper focuses on the analysis of the plasticity effect in the measurement of the residual stress by the hole-drilling method. Relaxed strains were evaluated by the computational simulation of the hole-drilling experiment using the finite element method. Errors induced by the yielding were estimated for uniaxial tension, plane shear stress state and equi-biaxial stress state at various magnitudes of residual stress uniformly distributed along the depth. The correction of the plasticity effect in the evaluation of residual stress was realized according to the method proposed by authors from the University in Pisa, which was coded in MATLAB. Results obtained from the MATLAB script were compared to the original input data of the hole-drilling simulation and discussed. The analyses suggested that the plasticity effect is negligible at the ratio of applied equivalent stress to yield stress, being 0.6, and that the correction of the plasticity effect is very successful at the previous ratio, being 0.9. Failing to comply with the condition of the strain gauge rosette orientation according to the principal stresses directions causes an increase in the relative error of corrected stresses only for the case of uniaxial tension. It affects the relative error negligibly for the plane shear and equi-biaxial stress states.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/15/3396residual stresshole-drilling methodplasticity effectfinite element methodcomputational simulation
spellingShingle Tomáš Návrat
Dávid Halabuk
Petr Vosynek
Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
Materials
residual stress
hole-drilling method
plasticity effect
finite element method
computational simulation
title Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
title_full Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
title_fullStr Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
title_short Efficiency of Plasticity Correction in the Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Measurement
title_sort efficiency of plasticity correction in the hole drilling residual stress measurement
topic residual stress
hole-drilling method
plasticity effect
finite element method
computational simulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/15/3396
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasnavrat efficiencyofplasticitycorrectionintheholedrillingresidualstressmeasurement
AT davidhalabuk efficiencyofplasticitycorrectionintheholedrillingresidualstressmeasurement
AT petrvosynek efficiencyofplasticitycorrectionintheholedrillingresidualstressmeasurement