Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings

The latest generation of storage ring-based light sources employs multibend achromat lattices to achieve ultralow emittance. These lattices make use of a large number of weak bending magnets which considerably reduces the amount of power radiated in the dipoles in comparison to power radiated from i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. C. Leemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2014-05-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.050705
_version_ 1818064094136107008
author S. C. Leemann
author_facet S. C. Leemann
author_sort S. C. Leemann
collection DOAJ
description The latest generation of storage ring-based light sources employs multibend achromat lattices to achieve ultralow emittance. These lattices make use of a large number of weak bending magnets which considerably reduces the amount of power radiated in the dipoles in comparison to power radiated from insertion devices. Therefore, in such storage rings, parameters such as emittance, energy spread, and radiated power are—unlike 3rd generation storage rings—no longer constant during a typical user shift. Instead, they depend on several varying parameters such as insertion device gap settings, bunch charge, bunch length, etc. Since the charge per bunch is usually high, intrabeam scattering in medium-energy storage rings with ultralow emittance becomes very strong. This creates a dependence of emittance on stored current. Furthermore, since the bunch length is adjusted with rf cavities but is also varied as insertion device gaps change, the emittance blowup from intrabeam scattering is not constant either. Therefore, the emittance, bunch length, and hence the resulting Touschek lifetime have to be calculated in a self-consistent fashion with 6D tracking taking into account not only the bare lattice and rf cavity settings, but also momentary bunch charge and gap settings. Using the MAX IV 3 GeV storage ring as an example, this paper demonstrates the intricate interplay between transverse emittance (insertion devices, emittance coupling), longitudinal emittance (tuning of main cavities as well as harmonic cavities), and choice of stored current in an ultralow-emittance storage ring as well as some implications for brightness optimization.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:30:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9cecc7edd95a45a897f06b9e5fb16fce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1098-4402
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:30:32Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
spelling doaj.art-9cecc7edd95a45a897f06b9e5fb16fce2022-12-22T01:44:56ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams1098-44022014-05-0117505070510.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.050705Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage ringsS. C. LeemannThe latest generation of storage ring-based light sources employs multibend achromat lattices to achieve ultralow emittance. These lattices make use of a large number of weak bending magnets which considerably reduces the amount of power radiated in the dipoles in comparison to power radiated from insertion devices. Therefore, in such storage rings, parameters such as emittance, energy spread, and radiated power are—unlike 3rd generation storage rings—no longer constant during a typical user shift. Instead, they depend on several varying parameters such as insertion device gap settings, bunch charge, bunch length, etc. Since the charge per bunch is usually high, intrabeam scattering in medium-energy storage rings with ultralow emittance becomes very strong. This creates a dependence of emittance on stored current. Furthermore, since the bunch length is adjusted with rf cavities but is also varied as insertion device gaps change, the emittance blowup from intrabeam scattering is not constant either. Therefore, the emittance, bunch length, and hence the resulting Touschek lifetime have to be calculated in a self-consistent fashion with 6D tracking taking into account not only the bare lattice and rf cavity settings, but also momentary bunch charge and gap settings. Using the MAX IV 3 GeV storage ring as an example, this paper demonstrates the intricate interplay between transverse emittance (insertion devices, emittance coupling), longitudinal emittance (tuning of main cavities as well as harmonic cavities), and choice of stored current in an ultralow-emittance storage ring as well as some implications for brightness optimization.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.050705
spellingShingle S. C. Leemann
Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
title Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
title_full Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
title_fullStr Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
title_full_unstemmed Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
title_short Interplay of Touschek scattering, intrabeam scattering, and rf cavities in ultralow-emittance storage rings
title_sort interplay of touschek scattering intrabeam scattering and rf cavities in ultralow emittance storage rings
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.050705
work_keys_str_mv AT scleemann interplayoftouschekscatteringintrabeamscatteringandrfcavitiesinultralowemittancestoragerings