The time-series behavior of systemic inflammation-immune status in predicting survival of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Background: Systematic inflammation is believed to play a crucial role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. This study aims at evaluating the prognostic value of time-series behavior of systematic inflammation-immune status before and after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with locally ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tao Zhang, Jianyang Wang, Daquan Wang, Kunpeng Xu, Linfang Wu, Xin Wang, Wenqing Wang, Lei Deng, Jun Liang, Jima Lv, Zhouguang Hui, Zongmei Zhou, Qinfu Feng, Zefen Xiao, Dongfu Chen, Jie Wang, Luhua Wang, Nan Bi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of the National Cancer Center
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005421000508
Description
Summary:Background: Systematic inflammation is believed to play a crucial role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. This study aims at evaluating the prognostic value of time-series behavior of systematic inflammation-immune status before and after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods: The relationship between systematic inflammation-immune score (SIS, defined as pretreatment peripheral platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count) and the prognosis was tested in a retrospective study of 386 consecutive LA-NSCLC patients (Group A) with pretreatment SIS and 161 patients (Group B) with SIS before and one month after the dCRT. Results: SIS of 1400 × 109 was found to be an optimal cutoff point to stratify the patients into high (>1400 × 109) and low (≤1400 × 109) SIS groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the SIS, whether before or after dCRT, was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). High SIS (>1400 × 109) was shown to predict poor 3-year OS (P=0.006, hazard ratio [HR]=2.427), PFS (P=0.001, HR=2.442) and DMFS (P=0.015, HR=2.119). However, SIS was not related to local regional recurrence-free survival in either Group A (P=0.346) or Group B (P=0.486). Further, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SIS for OS was higher than the neutrophil count/lymphocyte count ratio, platelet count/lymphocyte count ratio, and other conventional clinic-pathological indices. Conclusions: The SIS is a stable and more sensitive survival predictor than other inflammation-based factors and conventional clinical indices, which may aid in more accurately stratifying patients for risk assessment and treatment decisions.
ISSN:2667-0054