Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey

The two most extensively beekeeping honeybee species were Apis mellifera and A. cerana. Other species that produced honey, albeit with infrequent cultivation, include A. dorsata, A. florea, and some stingless bees, including Trigona and Melipona. Different types of honeybees were known to affect th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordi Aditiya Prameswara, Tuti Suryati, Yuni Cahya Endrawati, Anuraga Jayanegara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bogor Agricultural University 2024-02-01
Series:Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia
Online Access:https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/49173
_version_ 1827315491890266112
author Jordi Aditiya Prameswara
Tuti Suryati
Yuni Cahya Endrawati
Anuraga Jayanegara
author_facet Jordi Aditiya Prameswara
Tuti Suryati
Yuni Cahya Endrawati
Anuraga Jayanegara
author_sort Jordi Aditiya Prameswara
collection DOAJ
description The two most extensively beekeeping honeybee species were Apis mellifera and A. cerana. Other species that produced honey, albeit with infrequent cultivation, include A. dorsata, A. florea, and some stingless bees, including Trigona and Melipona. Different types of honeybees were known to affect the quality of honey. Hence, this investigation aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to examine the similarities in honey quality between honey sourced from beekeeping and wild honeybees. Data analysis was performed using the OpenMEE software, facilitating the calculation of effect size and standard error. The effect size and common error data were subsequently organized into separate columns within a CSV file. This CSV file was then imported into the JASP 0.16.2 software to conduct heterogeneity and Egger tests to detect potential publication bias. The findings indicated significant disparities in the quality of honey produced by beekeeping, wild, and stingless bee honey, as determined by various parameters, including pH value, moisture, total sugar, acidity, HMF (hydroxymethylfurfural), and diastase enzyme levels (p < 0.05). According to the results of the meta-analysis, honey from beekeeping exhibited superior quality to that of wild and stingless bees. However, the average values of all parameters still adhered to the established honey quality standards set by the Standar Nasional Indonesia and the International Honey Standard (IHS).   Keywords: honey, honeybees, meta-analysis, physicochemical quality
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:56:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d07e2e504844874a17c277f2809cb08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0853-4217
2443-3462
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:56:11Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Bogor Agricultural University
record_format Article
series Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia
spelling doaj.art-9d07e2e504844874a17c277f2809cb082024-03-18T05:46:59ZengBogor Agricultural UniversityJurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia0853-42172443-34622024-02-0129210.18343/jipi.29.2.315Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee HoneyJordi Aditiya Prameswara0Tuti Suryati1Yuni Cahya Endrawati2Anuraga Jayanegara3IPB UniversityDepartment of Animal Production Science and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor 16680Department of Animal Production Science and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, IPB Dramaga Campus, Bogor 16680Department of Nutrition Science and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, IPB Darmaga Campus Bogor 16680 The two most extensively beekeeping honeybee species were Apis mellifera and A. cerana. Other species that produced honey, albeit with infrequent cultivation, include A. dorsata, A. florea, and some stingless bees, including Trigona and Melipona. Different types of honeybees were known to affect the quality of honey. Hence, this investigation aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to examine the similarities in honey quality between honey sourced from beekeeping and wild honeybees. Data analysis was performed using the OpenMEE software, facilitating the calculation of effect size and standard error. The effect size and common error data were subsequently organized into separate columns within a CSV file. This CSV file was then imported into the JASP 0.16.2 software to conduct heterogeneity and Egger tests to detect potential publication bias. The findings indicated significant disparities in the quality of honey produced by beekeeping, wild, and stingless bee honey, as determined by various parameters, including pH value, moisture, total sugar, acidity, HMF (hydroxymethylfurfural), and diastase enzyme levels (p < 0.05). According to the results of the meta-analysis, honey from beekeeping exhibited superior quality to that of wild and stingless bees. However, the average values of all parameters still adhered to the established honey quality standards set by the Standar Nasional Indonesia and the International Honey Standard (IHS).   Keywords: honey, honeybees, meta-analysis, physicochemical quality https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/49173
spellingShingle Jordi Aditiya Prameswara
Tuti Suryati
Yuni Cahya Endrawati
Anuraga Jayanegara
Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia
title Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
title_full Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
title_short Meta-analysis of Physicochemical Characteristics in Beekeeping, Wild, and Stingless Bee Honey
title_sort meta analysis of physicochemical characteristics in beekeeping wild and stingless bee honey
url https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/JIPI/article/view/49173
work_keys_str_mv AT jordiaditiyaprameswara metaanalysisofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsinbeekeepingwildandstinglessbeehoney
AT tutisuryati metaanalysisofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsinbeekeepingwildandstinglessbeehoney
AT yunicahyaendrawati metaanalysisofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsinbeekeepingwildandstinglessbeehoney
AT anuragajayanegara metaanalysisofphysicochemicalcharacteristicsinbeekeepingwildandstinglessbeehoney