Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process

Several ultrasonic cleaning tanks (UCTs) had a problem: a manufacturer complained that there were damages to cleaning objects, they were unclarified, and it needed to be abruptly solved. To investigate and solve the problem, a small UCT filled with 3.92 L of water, with a frequency of 28 kHz, two ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suchada Phophayu, Ketmanee Kliangklom, Jatuporn Thongsri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Fluids
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/7/3/99
_version_ 1797471666222137344
author Suchada Phophayu
Ketmanee Kliangklom
Jatuporn Thongsri
author_facet Suchada Phophayu
Ketmanee Kliangklom
Jatuporn Thongsri
author_sort Suchada Phophayu
collection DOAJ
description Several ultrasonic cleaning tanks (UCTs) had a problem: a manufacturer complained that there were damages to cleaning objects, they were unclarified, and it needed to be abruptly solved. To investigate and solve the problem, a small UCT filled with 3.92 L of water, with a frequency of 28 kHz, two horn transducers, and a total power of 100 W was built for simulation and experiment. A built tank body material of UCT can be adjustable to acrylic, glass, and stainless steel. Since the cavitation causing the cleaning relates to acoustic pressure, harmonic response analysis (HRA) in ANSYS software was employed to calculate the acoustic pressure inside the UCT for different designs such as mentioned materials, power, thickness, volume, and frequency. The HRA results revealed uneven acoustic pressure depending on the tank designs, consistent with foil corrosion and power concentration experiments. Furthermore, using the tank body material with acrylic, glass, and stainless steel provided the highest, moderate, and lowest acoustic pressure levels, respectively. The uneven acoustic pressure resulted from the differences in material transmission coefficients. In addition, the damage occurred because of improper tank design, resulting in excessive acoustic pressure. Therefore, the tank design is indispensable in designing high-efficiency UCTs to reduce damage and meet customer requirements.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:51:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d090993db2548208629dba03e268c1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-5521
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:51:24Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fluids
spelling doaj.art-9d090993db2548208629dba03e268c1f2023-11-24T01:09:22ZengMDPI AGFluids2311-55212022-03-01739910.3390/fluids7030099Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning ProcessSuchada Phophayu0Ketmanee Kliangklom1Jatuporn Thongsri2Computer Simulation in Engineering Research Group, College of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, ThailandComputer Simulation in Engineering Research Group, College of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, ThailandComputer Simulation in Engineering Research Group, College of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, ThailandSeveral ultrasonic cleaning tanks (UCTs) had a problem: a manufacturer complained that there were damages to cleaning objects, they were unclarified, and it needed to be abruptly solved. To investigate and solve the problem, a small UCT filled with 3.92 L of water, with a frequency of 28 kHz, two horn transducers, and a total power of 100 W was built for simulation and experiment. A built tank body material of UCT can be adjustable to acrylic, glass, and stainless steel. Since the cavitation causing the cleaning relates to acoustic pressure, harmonic response analysis (HRA) in ANSYS software was employed to calculate the acoustic pressure inside the UCT for different designs such as mentioned materials, power, thickness, volume, and frequency. The HRA results revealed uneven acoustic pressure depending on the tank designs, consistent with foil corrosion and power concentration experiments. Furthermore, using the tank body material with acrylic, glass, and stainless steel provided the highest, moderate, and lowest acoustic pressure levels, respectively. The uneven acoustic pressure resulted from the differences in material transmission coefficients. In addition, the damage occurred because of improper tank design, resulting in excessive acoustic pressure. Therefore, the tank design is indispensable in designing high-efficiency UCTs to reduce damage and meet customer requirements.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/7/3/99acoustic pressurecavitationharmonic response analysishorn transducersimulationultrasonic cleaning
spellingShingle Suchada Phophayu
Ketmanee Kliangklom
Jatuporn Thongsri
Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
Fluids
acoustic pressure
cavitation
harmonic response analysis
horn transducer
simulation
ultrasonic cleaning
title Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
title_full Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
title_fullStr Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
title_full_unstemmed Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
title_short Harmonic Response Analysis of Tank Design Effect on Ultrasonic Cleaning Process
title_sort harmonic response analysis of tank design effect on ultrasonic cleaning process
topic acoustic pressure
cavitation
harmonic response analysis
horn transducer
simulation
ultrasonic cleaning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/7/3/99
work_keys_str_mv AT suchadaphophayu harmonicresponseanalysisoftankdesigneffectonultrasoniccleaningprocess
AT ketmaneekliangklom harmonicresponseanalysisoftankdesigneffectonultrasoniccleaningprocess
AT jatupornthongsri harmonicresponseanalysisoftankdesigneffectonultrasoniccleaningprocess