Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls

Abstract Introduction The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the prothrombin time (PT) are widely available coagulation parameters which are however poor predictors of the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some coagulometers use the clot waveform analysis (CWA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Evrard, Romain Siriez, Céline Bouvy, Julien Favresse, Halil Yildiz, Philippe Hainaut, François Mullier, Jean‐Michel Dogné, Jonathan Douxfils
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12804
_version_ 1797757347471294464
author Jonathan Evrard
Romain Siriez
Céline Bouvy
Julien Favresse
Halil Yildiz
Philippe Hainaut
François Mullier
Jean‐Michel Dogné
Jonathan Douxfils
author_facet Jonathan Evrard
Romain Siriez
Céline Bouvy
Julien Favresse
Halil Yildiz
Philippe Hainaut
François Mullier
Jean‐Michel Dogné
Jonathan Douxfils
author_sort Jonathan Evrard
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the prothrombin time (PT) are widely available coagulation parameters which are however poor predictors of the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some coagulometers use the clot waveform analysis (CWA) to assess the clotting time but mainly based on a unique parameter. The improvement of these methodologies and the evaluation of the other waveform parameters may increase the sensitivity to DOACs. Objectives To assess the performance of an improved clot waveform an method (i.e. FibWave) to detect the impact of edoxaban on the coagulation and the fibrinolytic systems. Methods Seventy‐one samples from patients treated with edoxaban collected at minimum concentration (CTROUGH) and/or maximum concentration (CMAX), and 45 control samples were included. The aPTT‐ and PT‐based CWA as well as the FibIn, FibEx, and FibLysis methodologies of the FibWave were implemented and performed on an ACL‐TOP 700. Results PT and FibEx clotting time were strongly correlated to edoxaban concentration (Pearson r = 0.80 and 0.89, respectively). The FibEx clotting time allowed a better discrimination for samples with 30 and 50 ng/ml of edoxaban compared to PT (cutoffs of 96.5 and 114.2 s for the FibEx versus a unique cutoff of 13.1 s for the PT). The fibrinolytic process was impaired in the presence of edoxaban in a dose‐dependent manner. Conclusion FibEx is more sensitive than aPTT‐ and PT‐based CWA for the detection of the clinically relevant anticoagulant level of edoxaban.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:14:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9d121dd28dea4655bd8d0228fc63adb6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-0379
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:14:32Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
spelling doaj.art-9d121dd28dea4655bd8d0228fc63adb62023-08-02T09:11:54ZengElsevierResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis2475-03792022-10-0167n/an/a10.1002/rth2.12804Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controlsJonathan Evrard0Romain Siriez1Céline Bouvy2Julien Favresse3Halil Yildiz4Philippe Hainaut5François Mullier6Jean‐Michel Dogné7Jonathan Douxfils8Department of Pharmacy Université de Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Namur BelgiumDepartment of Pharmacy Université de Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Namur BelgiumQualiblood s.a. Namur BelgiumDepartment of Pharmacy Université de Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Namur BelgiumDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels BelgiumDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels BelgiumHematology Laboratory Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Yvoir BelgiumDepartment of Pharmacy Université de Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Namur BelgiumDepartment of Pharmacy Université de Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS) Namur BelgiumAbstract Introduction The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the prothrombin time (PT) are widely available coagulation parameters which are however poor predictors of the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some coagulometers use the clot waveform analysis (CWA) to assess the clotting time but mainly based on a unique parameter. The improvement of these methodologies and the evaluation of the other waveform parameters may increase the sensitivity to DOACs. Objectives To assess the performance of an improved clot waveform an method (i.e. FibWave) to detect the impact of edoxaban on the coagulation and the fibrinolytic systems. Methods Seventy‐one samples from patients treated with edoxaban collected at minimum concentration (CTROUGH) and/or maximum concentration (CMAX), and 45 control samples were included. The aPTT‐ and PT‐based CWA as well as the FibIn, FibEx, and FibLysis methodologies of the FibWave were implemented and performed on an ACL‐TOP 700. Results PT and FibEx clotting time were strongly correlated to edoxaban concentration (Pearson r = 0.80 and 0.89, respectively). The FibEx clotting time allowed a better discrimination for samples with 30 and 50 ng/ml of edoxaban compared to PT (cutoffs of 96.5 and 114.2 s for the FibEx versus a unique cutoff of 13.1 s for the PT). The fibrinolytic process was impaired in the presence of edoxaban in a dose‐dependent manner. Conclusion FibEx is more sensitive than aPTT‐ and PT‐based CWA for the detection of the clinically relevant anticoagulant level of edoxaban.https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12804activated partial thromboplastin timeanticoagulantsclot waveform analysisedoxabanfibrinfibrinolysis
spellingShingle Jonathan Evrard
Romain Siriez
Céline Bouvy
Julien Favresse
Halil Yildiz
Philippe Hainaut
François Mullier
Jean‐Michel Dogné
Jonathan Douxfils
Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
activated partial thromboplastin time
anticoagulants
clot waveform analysis
edoxaban
fibrin
fibrinolysis
title Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
title_full Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
title_fullStr Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
title_short Comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and FibWave in edoxaban‐treated patients and healthy controls
title_sort comparison of analytical performances between clot waveform analysis and fibwave in edoxaban treated patients and healthy controls
topic activated partial thromboplastin time
anticoagulants
clot waveform analysis
edoxaban
fibrin
fibrinolysis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12804
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanevrard comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT romainsiriez comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT celinebouvy comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT julienfavresse comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT halilyildiz comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT philippehainaut comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT francoismullier comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT jeanmicheldogne comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols
AT jonathandouxfils comparisonofanalyticalperformancesbetweenclotwaveformanalysisandfibwaveinedoxabantreatedpatientsandhealthycontrols