Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm
Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment using manifest refraction versus a new topography analysis software. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observer-masked contralateral study was conducted in the refractive services o...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=6;spage=2430;epage=2435;aulast=Sachdev |
_version_ | 1797775098578468864 |
---|---|
author | Gitansha S Sachdev Shreyas Ramamurthy B Soundarya Ramamurthy Dandapani |
author_facet | Gitansha S Sachdev Shreyas Ramamurthy B Soundarya Ramamurthy Dandapani |
author_sort | Gitansha S Sachdev |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment using manifest refraction versus a new topography analysis software. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observer-masked contralateral study was conducted in the refractive services of a tertiary eye care hospital in South India. Analysis of visual outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were performed at 3 months postoperative visit following uneventful topography-guided LASIK using the Wavelight EX500. One eye was treated with the Contoura platform using manifest refraction (Contoura), while the contralateral eye was treated using an ablation profile planned by the Phorcides Analytic Engine (Phorcides). Results: Sixty eyes of 30 patients were included in the study. At 3 months postoperative visit, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the Contoura and Phorcides groups was logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.04 ± 0.07 and logMAR 0.06 ± 0.1, respectively (P = 0.483). Postoperative manifest refractive spherical error (MRSE) was 0.12 ± 0.22 and − 0.06 ± 0.20 D in the Contoura and Phorcides groups, respectively (P = 0.338). Although higher number of eyes demonstrated a gain in one or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in the Contoura group (16.6% vs. 6.6%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.361). Vector analysis (Alpins criteria) for postoperative cylinder, contrast sensitivity measurement, and corneal higher-order aberration profile showed no significant difference between the two groups at 3 months postoperative visit (P = 0.213, 0.514, and 0.332, respectively). Conclusion: Quantitative and qualitative visual outcomes with the Phorcides Analytic Software were similar to the Contoura treatment using manifest refraction. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:30:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9d129bcb4c0c48cf939756aed5dd2809 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0301-4738 1998-3689 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T22:30:45Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Ophthalmology |
spelling | doaj.art-9d129bcb4c0c48cf939756aed5dd28092023-07-21T15:15:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892023-01-017162430243510.4103/IJO.IJO_226_23Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithmGitansha S SachdevShreyas RamamurthyB SoundaryaRamamurthy DandapaniPurpose: To compare the visual outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment using manifest refraction versus a new topography analysis software. Methods: A prospective, randomized, observer-masked contralateral study was conducted in the refractive services of a tertiary eye care hospital in South India. Analysis of visual outcomes, corneal higher-order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were performed at 3 months postoperative visit following uneventful topography-guided LASIK using the Wavelight EX500. One eye was treated with the Contoura platform using manifest refraction (Contoura), while the contralateral eye was treated using an ablation profile planned by the Phorcides Analytic Engine (Phorcides). Results: Sixty eyes of 30 patients were included in the study. At 3 months postoperative visit, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the Contoura and Phorcides groups was logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.04 ± 0.07 and logMAR 0.06 ± 0.1, respectively (P = 0.483). Postoperative manifest refractive spherical error (MRSE) was 0.12 ± 0.22 and − 0.06 ± 0.20 D in the Contoura and Phorcides groups, respectively (P = 0.338). Although higher number of eyes demonstrated a gain in one or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in the Contoura group (16.6% vs. 6.6%), the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.361). Vector analysis (Alpins criteria) for postoperative cylinder, contrast sensitivity measurement, and corneal higher-order aberration profile showed no significant difference between the two groups at 3 months postoperative visit (P = 0.213, 0.514, and 0.332, respectively). Conclusion: Quantitative and qualitative visual outcomes with the Phorcides Analytic Software were similar to the Contoura treatment using manifest refraction.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=6;spage=2430;epage=2435;aulast=Sachdevcontouralasikphorcidestopography-guided lasik |
spellingShingle | Gitansha S Sachdev Shreyas Ramamurthy B Soundarya Ramamurthy Dandapani Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm Indian Journal of Ophthalmology contoura lasik phorcides topography-guided lasik |
title | Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
title_full | Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
title_short | Comparative analysis of outcomes following topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
title_sort | comparative analysis of outcomes following topography guided laser in situ keratomileusis using manifest refraction versus a new topographic analysis algorithm |
topic | contoura lasik phorcides topography-guided lasik |
url | http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=6;spage=2430;epage=2435;aulast=Sachdev |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gitanshassachdev comparativeanalysisofoutcomesfollowingtopographyguidedlaserinsitukeratomileusisusingmanifestrefractionversusanewtopographicanalysisalgorithm AT shreyasramamurthy comparativeanalysisofoutcomesfollowingtopographyguidedlaserinsitukeratomileusisusingmanifestrefractionversusanewtopographicanalysisalgorithm AT bsoundarya comparativeanalysisofoutcomesfollowingtopographyguidedlaserinsitukeratomileusisusingmanifestrefractionversusanewtopographicanalysisalgorithm AT ramamurthydandapani comparativeanalysisofoutcomesfollowingtopographyguidedlaserinsitukeratomileusisusingmanifestrefractionversusanewtopographicanalysisalgorithm |